Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run
Enable Banking vs Teller
Enable Banking has a score of 47.3 (D) against Teller's 43 (E). Both do bank accounts. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 59 points.
Enable BankingEnable Banking · HTTP API
D47.3/100#384 of 452
TellerTeller · HTTP API
E43/100#410 of 452
Which one, for what
Pick Enable Banking for
- reliability (+10)
- schema & documentation (+10)
- maintenance & community (+59)
- transparency & trust (+6)
Pick Teller for
- agent ergonomics (+13)
- payments & pricing (+20)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Enable Banking | Teller | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 33 | 23 | Enable Banking +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 54 | 44 | Enable Banking +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 80 | Teller +13 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 49 | Teller +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 40 | Teller +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 67 | 8 | Enable Banking +59 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 45 | Enable Banking +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 47.3 · D | 43 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Enable Banking | Teller |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Enable Banking | Teller |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.enablebanking.com | https://api.teller.io |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | Token |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (code samples) | ISC (Connect React wrapper, per package.json) |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | 2025-03-18 |
| Popularity | none | 10 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Enable Banking
Restricted mode gives live data for your own whitelisted accounts before any contract. No public prices and a minimum monthly invoice.
Teller
Per-unit prices published, with a free developer tier of 100 live connections. US only.
Before you call either
Enable Banking
- Mint one JWT per run with exp under 24 hours; don't reuse a long-lived token across sessions
- Test against the Mock ASPSP first; bank sandboxes fail for reasons that aren't yours
- Pass the bank's maximum_consent_validity as valid_until, usually 180 days, or you'll be back at the bank sooner
- On 429 ASPSP_RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED stop until tomorrow; it's the bank's 4-a-day cap
- Follow continuation_key until it's absent to get every transaction
Teller
- In sandbox call https://api.teller.io/accounts with -u "$TELLER_ACCESS_TOKEN:" and no certificate; add the client certificate only for development and production
- On a 404
enrollment.disconnected.*code, stop and send the user back through Teller Connect in update mode; retrying won't help - Pin the Teller-Version header so a dashboard upgrade doesn't change response shapes under you
- Widen transaction syncs 7 to 10 days past the last sync to catch pending items that change date
- Send an Idempotency-Key on every payment request; keys are kept for 72 hours
Other comparisons with Enable Banking or Teller
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/enable-banking.json·/api/v1/tools/teller.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/enable-banking-vs-teller.md