Basiq vs Teller

Basiq

Ten public OpenAPI files, an llms.txt index with Markdown twins and a free self-serve sandbox let an agent start on test data. Live access needs a 12-month plan with an unpublished platform access fee, no SLA or security.txt was found, and the privacy policy says collected content may be kept indefinitely.

Teller

Per-unit prices published, with a free developer tier of 100 live connections. US only.

Basiq

1. Send the API key verbatim after Basic in the Authorization header of POST /token. Base64-encoding it returns a 400.
2. Send basiq-version: 3.0 on the token request, cache the bearer token for its 60 minutes, and stay under 1,500 token requests per 5 minutes.
3. Send the account holder through the hosted Consent UI in a browser with a CLIENT_ACCESS token bound to their userId. The API alone cannot create a first connection on version 3.0.
4. Poll GET /jobs/{jobId} until verify-credentials, retrieve-accounts and retrieve-transactions all read success before reading accounts or transactions.
5. Follow links.next on GET /users/{userId}/transactions. A page holds at most 500 items, and pending transactions get new ids on each refresh.

Teller

1. In sandbox call https://api.teller.io/accounts with -u "$TELLER_ACCESS_TOKEN:" and no certificate; add the client certificate only for development and production
2. On a 404 enrollment.disconnected.* code, stop and send the user back through Teller Connect in update mode; retrying won't help
3. Pin the Teller-Version header so a dashboard upgrade doesn't change response shapes under you
4. Widen transaction syncs 7 to 10 days past the last sync to catch pending items that change date
5. Send an Idempotency-Key on every payment request; keys are kept for 72 hours