Head to head · Bank account data · October 2026 research run

Akoya vs Basiq

Basiq scores 60.4 (C) on agent readiness against Akoya's 48.3 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Akoya leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do bank account data.

Best open banking and bank data APIs for AI agents · All 105 bank data comparisons

Which one, for what

Akoya D

Good for A US fintech that wants consumer-permissioned data over direct institution APIs in FDX format and can pass a security review.

Ahead on

  • Agent ergonomics, 67 against 62
  • Security & auth, 64 against 55

Watch for

No price is published. Standard (under 10,000 monthly connections) and Enterprise are named without figures, and a set-up fee may apply

Basiq C

Good for Consented bank data for Australia and New Zealand, with income and affordability reports for lenders.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 28
  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 70
  • Payments & pricing, 20 against 10
  • Maintenance & community, 48 against 33
  • Transparency & trust, 72 against 58

Watch for

Live data needs a plan with a 12-month minimum and a platform access fee whose amount is not published

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAkoyaBasiqEdge
Reliability16%202870Basiq +42
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27084Basiq +14
Agent ergonomics13%16.26762Akoya +5
Security & auth14%17.56455Akoya +9
Payments & pricing10%12.51020Basiq +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.83348Basiq +15
Transparency & trust7%8.85872Basiq +14
Negative events≤1500
Total48.3 · D60.4 · C

Facts side by side

FactAkoyaBasiq
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorAkoya LLCBasiq Pty Ltd (Cuscal Limited)
Hosted endpointhttps://products.ddp.akoya.comhttps://au-api.basiq.io
TransportsHTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuthAPI key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under the Akoya Terms of Use and a signed data access agreementProprietary service under the Basiq Terms of Service. The public docs repository carries no licence file, and the OpenAPI files state the licence as Commercial
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-08-052026-09-30
Terms last updated2024-12-20no date given
Privacy policy last updatedno date givenno date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text

Verdicts

Akoya

Six OpenAPI 3.1 specifications, a free self-service sandbox and read-only data endpoints behind per-consumer OAuth tokens make the API straightforward to test. Production needs a security review and a signed agreement, no price is published, and no public status page, SLA, SDK or llms.txt was found.

Basiq

Ten public OpenAPI files, an llms.txt index with Markdown twins and a free self-serve sandbox let an agent start on test data. Live access needs a 12-month plan with an unpublished platform access fee, no SLA or security.txt was found, and the privacy policy says collected content may be kept indefinitely.

Before you call either

Akoya

  1. Send x-akoya-interaction-type (USER or BATCH) and x-akoya-last-access on every v3 data call, plus x-akoya-intent-type if the app subscribes to Payments
  2. Use the id_token as the bearer token. The /token response has no access_token field, so generic OAuth libraries need adjusting
  3. Treat ID tokens as valid for 15 minutes, refresh on error 602, and store the new refresh token returned by every refresh
  4. Page transactions by following links.next.href unchanged. Set limit, startTime and endTime on the first call only
  5. On 429 with code 1207 slow the request rate. On 5xx retry up to three times with exponential backoff

Basiq

  1. Send the API key verbatim after Basic in the Authorization header of POST /token. Base64-encoding it returns a 400.
  2. Send basiq-version: 3.0 on the token request, cache the bearer token for its 60 minutes, and stay under 1,500 token requests per 5 minutes.
  3. Send the account holder through the hosted Consent UI in a browser with a CLIENT_ACCESS token bound to their userId. The API alone cannot create a first connection on version 3.0.
  4. Poll GET /jobs/{jobId} until verify-credentials, retrieve-accounts and retrieve-transactions all read success before reading accounts or transactions.
  5. Follow links.next on GET /users/{userId}/transactions. A page holds at most 500 items, and pending transactions get new ids on each refresh.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Akoya or Basiq?

Basiq scores 60.4 (C) on agent readiness against Akoya's 48.3 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Akoya leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth.

Do Akoya and Basiq need an API key?

Akoya uses an OAuth sign-in. Basiq needs an API key.

Can an agent call Akoya and Basiq without installing anything?

Yes. Akoya has a hosted endpoint at https://products.ddp.akoya.com and Basiq at https://au-api.basiq.io.

Other comparisons with Akoya or Basiq

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.