Get an audit

Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run

Akoya vs Flinks

Flinks scores 52.7 (D) on agent readiness against Akoya's 48.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Akoya leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do bank accounts.

AkoyaAkoya LLC · HTTP API D48.3/100#623 of 722 FlinksFlinks Technology Inc. (National Bank of Canada) · HTTP API D52.7/100#559 of 722

Which one, for what

Akoya D

Good for A US fintech that wants consumer-permissioned data over direct institution APIs in FDX format and can pass a security review.

Ahead on

  • Agent ergonomics, 67 against 54
  • Security & auth, 64 against 50

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

No price is published. Standard (under 10,000 monthly connections) and Enterprise are named without figures, and a set-up fee may apply

Flinks D

Good for A lender or fintech with steady volume that needs Canadian bank data, income and lending attributes, PDF statements or Canadian bank payments.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 53 against 28
  • Schema & documentation, 83 against 70
  • Payments & pricing, 25 against 10

Watch for

Live access needs a contract with a monthly minimum and a one-year term. The pricing page says there is no pay-as-you-go plan or self-serve trial

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAkoyaFlinksEdge
Reliability16%202853Flinks +25
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27083Flinks +13
Agent ergonomics13%16.26754Akoya +13
Security & auth14%17.56450Akoya +14
Payments & pricing10%12.51025Flinks +15
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.83331Akoya +2
Transparency & trust7%8.85860Flinks +2
Negative events≤1500
Total48.3 · D52.7 · D

Facts side by side

FactAkoyaFlinks
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorAkoya LLCFlinks Technology Inc. (National Bank of Canada)
Hosted endpointhttps://products.ddp.akoya.comno (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthOAuthAPI key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under the Akoya Terms of Use and a signed data access agreementProprietary service under Flinks' Master Terms and Conditions. No open-source SDK or repository was found
Read-only variant documentedyesyes
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-08-052026-09-01
Terms last updated2024-12-202023-08-03
Privacy policy last updatedno date given2022-09-22
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text

Verdicts

Akoya

Six OpenAPI 3.1 specifications, a free self-service sandbox and read-only data endpoints behind per-consumer OAuth tokens make the API straightforward to test. Production needs a security review and a signed agreement, no price is published, and no public status page, SLA, SDK or llms.txt was found.

Flinks

Ten public OpenAPI files, an llms.txt index with Markdown twins and published sandbox keys let an agent start without a signup. Live access needs a one-year contract from $500 a month, keys never expire, no rate-limit numbers are published, and the status page logged 77 incidents in 90 days.

Before you call either

Akoya

  1. Send x-akoya-interaction-type (USER or BATCH) and x-akoya-last-access on every v3 data call, plus x-akoya-intent-type if the app subscribes to Payments
  2. Use the id_token as the bearer token. The /token response has no access_token field, so generic OAuth libraries need adjusting
  3. Treat ID tokens as valid for 15 minutes, refresh on error 602, and store the new refresh token returned by every refresh
  4. Page transactions by following links.next.href unchanged. Set limit, startTime and endTime on the first call only
  5. On 429 with code 1207 slow the request rate. On 5xx retry up to three times with exponential backoff

Flinks

  1. Call /GenerateAuthorizeToken with the secret key in flinks-auth-key, then pass the returned token to the Connect iframe or to /Authorize. The token is single-use and expires after 15 minutes.
  2. Send the account holder through Flinks Connect in a browser. The API alone cannot complete a first bank login, and sandbox iframes need demo=true.
  3. Store the loginId. Call /Authorize with it and MostRecentCached: true for a new requestId each session, because /GetAccountsDetail consumes the requestId.
  4. On a 202 from /GetAccountsDetail, poll /GetAccountsDetailAsync every 10 seconds for at most 30 minutes, or ask support to enable webhooks.
  5. Route each end user to the instance for their country. A loginId from the Canadian instance is not valid on the US one.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Akoya or Flinks?

Flinks scores 52.7 (D) on agent readiness against Akoya's 48.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Akoya leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth.

Do Akoya and Flinks need an API key?

Akoya uses an OAuth sign-in. Flinks needs an API key.

Can an agent call Akoya and Flinks without installing anything?

Akoya has a hosted endpoint at https://products.ddp.akoya.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for Flinks.

Other comparisons with Akoya or Flinks

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report