Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run
Flinks vs Yapily
Yapily scores 57.6 (C) on agent readiness against Flinks's 52.7 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Flinks leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do bank accounts.
Which one, for what
Flinks D
Good for A lender or fintech with steady volume that needs Canadian bank data, income and lending attributes, PDF statements or Canadian bank payments.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 50 against 37
- Payments & pricing, 25 against 10
Watch for
Live access needs a contract with a monthly minimum and a one-year term. The pricing page says there is no pay-as-you-go plan or self-serve trial
Yapily C
Good for UK and EEA data and payments from one API, for builders who want docs an agent can read in one fetch.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 83
- Agent ergonomics, 77 against 54
- Maintenance & community, 67 against 31
- Transparency & trust, 71 against 60
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No public pricing; live access starts with a sales form
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Flinks | Yapily | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 53 | 55 | Yapily +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 83 | 88 | Yapily +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 54 | 77 | Yapily +23 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 37 | Flinks +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 25 | 10 | Flinks +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 31 | 67 | Yapily +36 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 71 | Yapily +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 52.7 · D | 57.6 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Flinks | Yapily |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Flinks Technology Inc. (National Bank of Canada) | Yapily |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.yapily.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Flinks' Master Terms and Conditions. No open-source SDK or repository was found | MIT (SDKs) |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2025-06-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2023-08-03 | 2022-12-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2022-09-22 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 14 stars, 50 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Flinks
Ten public OpenAPI files, an llms.txt index with Markdown twins and published sandbox keys let an agent start without a signup. Live access needs a one-year contract from $500 a month, keys never expire, no rate-limit numbers are published, and the status page logged 77 incidents in 90 days.
Yapily
llms.txt, llms-full.txt, a no-auth docs MCP server and an OpenAPI file. No public pricing; live access starts with a sales form.
Before you call either
Flinks
- Call
/GenerateAuthorizeTokenwith the secret key inflinks-auth-key, then pass the returned token to the Connect iframe or to/Authorize. The token is single-use and expires after 15 minutes. - Send the account holder through Flinks Connect in a browser. The API alone cannot complete a first bank login, and sandbox iframes need
demo=true. - Store the
loginId. Call/Authorizewith it andMostRecentCached: truefor a newrequestIdeach session, because/GetAccountsDetailconsumes therequestId. - On a 202 from
/GetAccountsDetail, poll/GetAccountsDetailAsyncevery 10 seconds for at most 30 minutes, or ask support to enable webhooks. - Route each end user to the instance for their country. A
loginIdfrom the Canadian instance is not valid on the US one.
Yapily
- Read llms-full.txt once and cache it; it's the whole documentation in one fetch
- Add the Modelo sandbox in the Console before your first account-auth-request, or institutions comes back empty
- Treat a 403 on a data call as a revoked or expired consent and send the user back through authorisation
- Check the error source field first; USER and INSTITUTION failures won't clear on retry
- In the UK, call extend-consent with lastConfirmedAt before the reconfirmBy date, or the consent lapses at 90 days
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Flinks or Yapily?
Yapily scores 57.6 (C) on agent readiness against Flinks's 52.7 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Flinks leads on security & auth and payments & pricing.
Do Flinks and Yapily need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Flinks and Yapily without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Flinks. Yapily has a hosted endpoint at https://api.yapily.com.
Other comparisons with Flinks or Yapily
- Akoya vs Flinks
- Akoya vs Yapily
- Belvo vs Flinks
- Belvo vs Yapily
- Enable Banking vs Flinks
- Enable Banking vs Yapily
- Flinks vs GoCardless Bank Account Data
- Flinks vs MX Platform API
- Flinks vs Plaid
- Flinks vs Salt Edge Account Information
- Flinks vs Teller
- Flinks vs Tink
- Flinks vs TrueLayer
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Yapily
- MX Platform API vs Yapily
- Plaid vs Yapily
- Salt Edge Account Information vs Yapily
- Teller vs Yapily
- Tink vs Yapily
- TrueLayer vs Yapily
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/flinks-vs-yapily.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/flinks.json·/api/v1/tools/yapily.json - From a terminal
anchor compare flinks yapily(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "flinks", "b": "yapily"}at/mcp, no key