Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run
Plaid vs Yapily
Plaid has a score of 70 (BB) against Yapily's 57.8 (C). Both do bank accounts. The largest gap is security & auth, 30 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Plaid for
- reliability (+13)
- schema & documentation (+5)
- agent ergonomics (+5)
- security & auth (+30)
- payments & pricing (+5)
- maintenance & community (+16)
- transparency & trust (+8)
Pick Yapily for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Plaid | Yapily | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 55 | Plaid +13 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 93 | 88 | Plaid +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 82 | 77 | Plaid +5 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 37 | Plaid +30 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 15 | 10 | Plaid +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 83 | 67 | Plaid +16 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 81 | 73 | Plaid +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 70 · BB | 57.8 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Plaid | Yapily |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Plaid | Yapily |
| Hosted endpoint | https://production.plaid.com | https://api.yapily.com |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (SDKs and MCP server) | MIT (SDKs) |
| Tools exposed | 4 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2025-06-30 |
| Popularity | 586 stars, 1.3M npm/wk, 657k PyPI/wk | 14 stars, 50 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Plaid
Public OpenAPI file, llms.txt with about 250 entries and a Markdown twin of every docs page. No prices before a Production application, and Transactions, Liabilities and Investments bill per Item each month until removed.
Yapily
llms.txt, llms-full.txt, a no-auth docs MCP server and an OpenAPI file. No public pricing; live access starts with a sales form.
Before you call either
Plaid
- Point calls at https://sandbox.plaid.com until you hold a Production secret; request shapes are the same
- Create a sandbox Item with /sandbox/public_token/create and ins_109508, then /item/public_token/exchange, no Link UI needed
- Use /transactions/sync with its cursor and back off on 429 RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED yourself, since no Retry-After comes back
- Call /item/remove when the user is done, or subscription products keep billing
- Send an idempotency_key on
/transfer/authorization/createso a retried request can't authorise twice
Yapily
- Read llms-full.txt once and cache it; it's the whole documentation in one fetch
- Add the Modelo sandbox in the Console before your first account-auth-request, or institutions comes back empty
- Treat a 403 on a data call as a revoked or expired consent and send the user back through authorisation
- Check the error source field first; USER and INSTITUTION failures won't clear on retry
- In the UK, call extend-consent with lastConfirmedAt before the reconfirmBy date, or the consent lapses at 90 days
Other comparisons with Plaid or Yapily
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/plaid.json·/api/v1/tools/yapily.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/plaid-vs-yapily.md