Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run

Plaid vs Yapily

Plaid has a score of 70 (BB) against Yapily's 57.8 (C). Both do bank accounts. The largest gap is security & auth, 30 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Plaid for

  • reliability (+13)
  • schema & documentation (+5)
  • agent ergonomics (+5)
  • security & auth (+30)
  • payments & pricing (+5)
  • maintenance & community (+16)
  • transparency & trust (+8)

Pick Yapily for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runPlaidYapilyEdge
Reliability16%206855Plaid +13
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29388Plaid +5
Agent ergonomics13%16.28277Plaid +5
Security & auth14%17.56737Plaid +30
Payments & pricing10%12.51510Plaid +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88367Plaid +16
Transparency & trust7%8.88173Plaid +8
Negative events≤1500
Total70 · BB57.8 · C

Facts side by side

FactPlaidYapily
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorPlaidYapily
Hosted endpointhttps://production.plaid.comhttps://api.yapily.com
TransportsHTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceMIT (SDKs and MCP server)MIT (SDKs)
Tools exposed4none
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-242025-06-30
Popularity586 stars, 1.3M npm/wk, 657k PyPI/wk14 stars, 50 npm/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Plaid

Public OpenAPI file, llms.txt with about 250 entries and a Markdown twin of every docs page. No prices before a Production application, and Transactions, Liabilities and Investments bill per Item each month until removed.

Yapily

llms.txt, llms-full.txt, a no-auth docs MCP server and an OpenAPI file. No public pricing; live access starts with a sales form.

Before you call either

Plaid

  1. Point calls at https://sandbox.plaid.com until you hold a Production secret; request shapes are the same
  2. Create a sandbox Item with /sandbox/public_token/create and ins_109508, then /item/public_token/exchange, no Link UI needed
  3. Use /transactions/sync with its cursor and back off on 429 RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED yourself, since no Retry-After comes back
  4. Call /item/remove when the user is done, or subscription products keep billing
  5. Send an idempotency_key on /transfer/authorization/create so a retried request can't authorise twice

Yapily

  1. Read llms-full.txt once and cache it; it's the whole documentation in one fetch
  2. Add the Modelo sandbox in the Console before your first account-auth-request, or institutions comes back empty
  3. Treat a 403 on a data call as a revoked or expired consent and send the user back through authorisation
  4. Check the error source field first; USER and INSTITUTION failures won't clear on retry
  5. In the UK, call extend-consent with lastConfirmedAt before the reconfirmBy date, or the consent lapses at 90 days

Other comparisons with Plaid or Yapily

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.