Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run
Plaid vs Tink
Plaid scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against Tink's 62.5 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Tink leads on transparency & trust. Both do bank accounts.
Which one, for what
Plaid B
Good for US and Canadian account, transaction, identity and income data, with Transfer for payments.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 62
- Schema & documentation, 93 against 73
- Agent ergonomics, 82 against 74
- Payments & pricing, 15 against 10
- Maintenance & community, 83 against 69
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
No prices before a Production application, and Transactions, Liabilities and Investments bill per Item each month until removed
Tink B
Good for A company with a contract that needs account, balance and transaction data or bank payments across European markets under Tink's own licences.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 90 against 79
Watch for
No public prices. The pricing page lists Standard as Contact us and Enterprise as Custom pricing, and the FAQ says there is no pay-per-use option
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Plaid | Tink | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 62 | Plaid +6 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 93 | 73 | Plaid +20 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 82 | 74 | Plaid +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 63 | Plaid +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 15 | 10 | Plaid +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 83 | 69 | Plaid +14 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 79 | 90 | Tink +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 69.8 · B | 62.5 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Plaid | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Plaid | Tink AB (Visa) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://production.plaid.com | https://api.tink.com |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (SDKs and MCP server) | Proprietary service under Tink's Master Service Agreement. The Tink Link SDKs for iOS and Android on GitHub are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 4 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-15 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-12-01 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-12-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 586 stars, 1.3M npm/wk, 657k PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Plaid
Public OpenAPI file, llms.txt with about 250 entries and a Markdown twin of every docs page. No prices before a Production application, and Transactions, Liabilities and Investments bill per Item each month until removed.
Tink
OAuth client credentials with per-endpoint scopes, token-paged data endpoints and a published MSA, DPA, SLA and sub-processor list. No price is public, live access needs a sales contract, and the API reference has no downloadable spec or published rate-limit numbers.
Before you call either
Plaid
- Point calls at https://sandbox.plaid.com until you hold a Production secret; request shapes are the same
- Create a sandbox Item with /sandbox/public_token/create and ins_109508, then /item/public_token/exchange, no Link UI needed
- Use /transactions/sync with its cursor and back off on 429 RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED yourself, since no Retry-After comes back
- Call /item/remove when the user is done, or subscription products keep billing
- Send an idempotency_key on
/transfer/authorization/createso a retried request can't authorise twice
Tink
- Request a client token at https://api.tink.com/api/v1/oauth/token, create a user, request an authorisation grant for that user, then exchange the code for a user token.
- Renew tokens on a timer. Client tokens last 30 minutes and user tokens two hours, and the client credentials flow returns no refresh token.
- Send the account holder through Tink Link in a browser. Bank consent cannot be completed by API calls alone.
- Read transactions from /data/v2/transactions with
pageSizeup to 100 and follownextPageToken. - Send an Idempotency-Key header on consent and payment writes. Keys are kept for 24 hours.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Plaid or Tink?
Plaid scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against Tink's 62.5 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Tink leads on transparency & trust.
Do Plaid and Tink need an API key?
Plaid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Tink uses an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Plaid and Tink without installing anything?
Yes. Plaid has a hosted endpoint at https://production.plaid.com and Tink at https://api.tink.com.
Are Plaid and Tink open source?
Plaid is open source (MIT (SDKs and MCP server)). No open-source release is listed for Tink.
Other comparisons with Plaid or Tink
- Belvo vs Plaid
- Belvo vs Tink
- Enable Banking vs Plaid
- Enable Banking vs Tink
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Plaid
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Tink
- Plaid vs Salt Edge Account Information
- Plaid vs Teller
- Plaid vs TrueLayer
- Plaid vs Yapily
- Salt Edge Account Information vs Tink
- Teller vs Tink
- Tink vs TrueLayer
- Tink vs Yapily
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/plaid-vs-tink.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/plaid.json·/api/v1/tools/tink.json - From a terminal
anchor compare plaid tink(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "plaid", "b": "tink"}at/mcp, no key