Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run
Salt Edge Account Information vs Yapily
Yapily has a score of 57.8 (C) against Salt Edge Account Information's 46.9 (D). Both do bank accounts. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 54 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Salt Edge Account Information for
- security & auth (+9)
Pick Yapily for
- schema & documentation (+36)
- agent ergonomics (+10)
- maintenance & community (+54)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Salt Edge Account Information | Yapily | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 52 | 55 | Yapily +3 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 52 | 88 | Yapily +36 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 77 | Yapily +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 46 | 37 | Salt Edge Account Information +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 10 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 13 | 67 | Yapily +54 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 73 | Salt Edge Account Information +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 46.9 · D | 57.8 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Salt Edge Account Information | Yapily |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Salt Edge | Yapily |
| Hosted endpoint | https://www.saltedge.com/api/v6 | https://api.yapily.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | MIT (SDKs) |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | none | 2025-06-30 |
| Popularity | none | 14 stars, 50 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Salt Edge Account Information
5,000-plus banks in more than 50 countries, by Salt Edge's own count. Rate limit exceeded returns HTTP 406 RateLimitExceeded, not 429.
Yapily
llms.txt, llms-full.txt, a no-auth docs MCP server and an OpenAPI file. No public pricing; live access starts with a sales form.
Before you call either
Salt Edge Account Information
- Treat HTTP 406 with error_class RateLimitExceeded as a rate limit and back off; it isn't a content-negotiation error
- Start with fakebank_simple_xf in country XF; it needs no bank sandbox
- Sign requests from the start even in Test, so the move to Live doesn't change your client
- Follow next_page from the meta block rather than building from_id URLs yourself
- Revoke with PUT /api/v6/consents/{consent_id}/revoke when the user is done
Yapily
- Read llms-full.txt once and cache it; it's the whole documentation in one fetch
- Add the Modelo sandbox in the Console before your first account-auth-request, or institutions comes back empty
- Treat a 403 on a data call as a revoked or expired consent and send the user back through authorisation
- Check the error source field first; USER and INSTITUTION failures won't clear on retry
- In the UK, call extend-consent with lastConfirmedAt before the reconfirmBy date, or the consent lapses at 90 days
Other comparisons with Salt Edge Account Information or Yapily
- Enable Banking vs Salt Edge Account Information
- Enable Banking vs Yapily
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Salt Edge Account Information
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs Yapily
- Plaid vs Salt Edge Account Information
- Plaid vs Yapily
- Salt Edge Account Information vs Teller
- Salt Edge Account Information vs TrueLayer
- Teller vs Yapily
- TrueLayer vs Yapily
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/salt-edge.json·/api/v1/tools/yapily.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/salt-edge-vs-yapily.md