Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
GroqCloud vs Muse Spark Open
GroqCloud scores 75.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Muse Spark Open's 53.4 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Muse Spark Open leads on payments & pricing. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 210 models comparisons
Which one, for what
GroqCloud BB
Best for Many small, latency-sensitive calls on open-weight models, routing, extraction and classification, and agents that need to start free.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 100 against 42
- Agent ergonomics, 80 against 69
- Security & auth, 77 against 44
- Maintenance & community, 72 against 60
- Transparency & trust, 85 against 53
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Four model shutdown dates between 2026-07-17 and 2026-09-21, with no stated minimum notice
Best for A team with a four-GPU Blackwell node, or two to four Mac Studios, that wants a 1M-token multimodal coding and agent model on its own hardware with no prompts leaving it.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 40
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
The NVFP4 checkpoint (about 537 GB) serves on four B300 GPUs and the BF16 one (about 1.65 TB) on eight
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GroqCloud | Muse Spark Open | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 100 | 42 | GroqCloud +58 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 64 | 61 | GroqCloud +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 80 | 69 | GroqCloud +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 77 | 44 | GroqCloud +33 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 50 | Muse Spark Open +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 72 | 60 | GroqCloud +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 85 | 53 | GroqCloud +32 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 75.6/100 | D 53.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GroqCloud | Muse Spark Open |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Groq | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.groq.com/openai/v1 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (SDKs) | Muse Model Licence (source-available weights, not an OSI licence), free of charge with an attribution notice, a separate agreement with Meta before Model as a Service by a licensee group above $20M gross revenue, and the Muse Spark Open Usage Policy |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-22 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-11-12 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 619 stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | none |
Verdicts
GroqCloud
Free plan with no card, at 30 requests a minute and 1,000 a day on gpt-oss. Four model shutdown dates between 2026-07-17 and 2026-09-21, with no stated minimum notice.
Muse Spark Open
Muse Spark Open runs on the owner's hardware in seven runtimes, with OpenAI-compatible servers in vLLM and SGLang, standard tool calls, a 1M-token context and Meta's own serving docs. Serving the 537 GB NVFP4 checkpoint takes four B300 GPUs, Meta's download is gated by manual review, and the licence adds attribution and a revenue threshold for model resellers.
Before you call either
GroqCloud
- Call
/modelsat start-up. Four model ids stopped working this quarter - Read
retry-afteron a 429 and thex-ratelimit-remaining-tokensheader before the next call - Free plan allows 8,000 tokens a minute on gpt-oss, so keep prompts small or batch them
- Don't build on Qwen 3.8 27B. It's a preview and previews can go at short notice
- Treat a 498 as Flex capacity and retry later; 5xx responses aren't billed
Muse Spark Open
- Start vLLM or SGLang with
--reasoning-parser muse --tool-call-parser muse(vLLM also--enable-auto-tool-choice), or tool calls come back as raw text - Set
reasoning_efforttolowormediumfor short tasks. The default isxhigh, reasoning can't be turned off, and other values return an error - Stop only on
<|eot|>and end of text. Stopping on<|eom|>cuts off tool calls and final answers - Stream long generations and leave
max_tokensroom for reasoning, orcontentcan come back empty withfinish_reasonlength - Don't call Meta Model API for this model. Use a self-hosted server or a hosted provider's model string, such as
meta-models/muse-spark-open
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GroqCloud or Muse Spark Open?
GroqCloud scores 75.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Muse Spark Open's 53.4 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Muse Spark Open leads on payments & pricing.
Do GroqCloud and Muse Spark Open need an API key?
GroqCloud needs an API key. Muse Spark Open needs no key.
Can an agent call GroqCloud and Muse Spark Open without installing anything?
GroqCloud has a hosted endpoint at https://api.groq.com/openai/v1. No hosted endpoint is listed for Muse Spark Open.
Other comparisons with GroqCloud or Muse Spark Open
- Claude API vs GroqCloud
- Claude API vs Muse Spark Open
- Antseed vs GroqCloud
- Antseed vs Muse Spark Open
- BlockRun.AI vs GroqCloud
- BlockRun.AI vs Muse Spark Open
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs GroqCloud
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Muse Spark Open
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs GroqCloud
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Muse Spark Open
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs GroqCloud
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepInfra vs GroqCloud
- DeepInfra vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek API vs GroqCloud
- DeepSeek API vs Muse Spark Open
- Gemini Developer API vs GroqCloud
- Gemini Developer API vs Muse Spark Open
- GroqCloud vs Meta Model API
- GroqCloud vs Mistral AI API
- GroqCloud vs Novita AI
- GroqCloud vs OpenAI API
- GroqCloud vs OpenRouter
- GroqCloud vs Prism Inference
- GroqCloud vs RouterPlus
- GroqCloud vs SambaCloud
- GroqCloud vs SiliconFlow
- GroqCloud vs StepFun API
- Meta Model API vs Muse Spark Open
- Mistral AI API vs Muse Spark Open
- Muse Spark Open vs Novita AI
- Muse Spark Open vs OpenAI API
- Muse Spark Open vs OpenRouter
- Muse Spark Open vs Prism Inference
- Muse Spark Open vs RouterPlus
- Muse Spark Open vs SambaCloud
- Muse Spark Open vs SiliconFlow
- Muse Spark Open vs StepFun API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/groq-vs-muse-spark-open.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/groq.json·/api/v1/tools/muse-spark-open.json - From a terminal
anchor compare groq muse-spark-open(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "groq", "b": "muse-spark-open"}at/mcp, no key