Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
Muse Ember vs Muse Spark Open
Muse Spark Open scores 53.4 (D) on agent readiness against Muse Ember's 51.8 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Muse Ember leads on security & auth. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 871 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that hand out many small, bounded tasks (sub-agents, tool loops, routing, extraction over thousands of files) and want a cheap multimodal model with a 1M context behind the same API as a bigger Muse model.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 64 against 44
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No weights and no parameter count published, so it can't be run locally
Best for A team with a four-GPU Blackwell node, or two to four Mac Studios, that wants a 1M-token multimodal coding and agent model on its own hardware with no prompts leaving it.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 60 against 46
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
The NVFP4 checkpoint (about 537 GB) serves on four B300 GPUs and the BF16 one (about 1.65 TB) on eight
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Payments & pricing Muse Spark Open +30
Muse Ember 20
Published rubric. No payment protocol (0). Per-token prices for both tiers published without a login, read 9 November (20). No free API allowance found; billing needs a card, per the platform reading (0). Browser sign-up (0). 0 + 20 + 0 + 0 = 20.
Muse Spark Open 50
Self-hosted rule. Nothing to buy from Meta, and the licence grants use free of charge. The Model as a Service clause asks for a separate agreement only from licensee groups above $20M gross revenue in 12 months (20). Free to run with no card (20). Meta's own weights need a manually reviewed Hugging Face form with legal name and date of birth, or, since the 4 November re-read of Get the model, a signed-in download from Meta's own page, so an agent can't get them alone. The ungated GGUF quantisations from ggml-org and Unsloth that Meta's docs point to download without approval (the Unsloth repository is ungated on 4 November), so part of the line (10 of 20). No payment protocol (0). Hosted copies at $1.25 input and $4.25 output per million tokens need each provider's own account and are not graded. 20 + 20 + 10 + 0 = 50.
Security & auth Muse Ember +20
Muse Ember 64
Platform readings are the meta-model-api listing's of 4 November. Team keys, named, revocable, no scopes (20 of 30). Standard mode only, so content isn't used to train Meta models under the terms, with safety use reserved (17 of 20). Retention 'as needed' with zero retention through sales (10 of 15). Usage dashboard by model, no per-call log (5 of 15). No security.txt on dev.meta.ai, a bug bounty and a security commitments page, no named certification (12 of 20). 20 + 17 + 10 + 5 + 12 = 64.
Muse Spark Open 44
Read as software the owner runs. No account or key to run it. Meta's weights need manual approval on Hugging Face and an access token, and server authentication is the owner's to add (12 of 30). An agent model that calls whatever tools the operator gives it. The card recommends human-in-the-loop confirmation for irreversible actions and Meta reports agentic-risk evaluations, but nothing in the model or template enforces an approval (8 of 20). The chat template neutralises special-token sequences and media placeholders in caller text and wraps tool results in <tool_output>, and the card advises protecting internal assistant messages and layering defences against adversarial input. No indirect prompt-injection results are published (10 of 15). No call log of its own. Visibility depends on the serving stack (5 of 15). Weights are safetensors that load through Transformers' own classes from 5.19, and Meta published cyber, chemical, biological and misalignment evaluations. dev.meta.ai/.well-known/security.txt answers 404 (re-read on 4 November), research.meta.ai per the 15 October check, and no security route is on the card or in the docs, only museoss@meta.com and the Hugging Face discussions (9 of 20). 12 + 8 + 10 + 5 + 9 = 44.
Maintenance & community Muse Spark Open +14
Muse Ember 46
Model reading. Released 9 November 2026 (30). No deprecation policy or notice period found, per the platform reading (0 of 12). Dated launches on the API, the latest Muse Wonder on 12 October and Muse Ember on 9 November (8 of 8). No Model API changelog; a help centre with tickets (8 of 15). No SDK of Meta's own (0 of 15, 0 of 10). 30 + 0 + 8 + 8 + 0 = 46.
Muse Spark Open 60
Read for an open-weight model released three weeks ago. Released on 15 October 2026 (30). One release, BF16 and NVFP4 on the same day, with no history of revisions, successors or notice periods, and Meta Model API has no deprecation policy either (6 of 20). None of the 29 replies counted by script on 4 November across the BF16 repository's discussions came from Meta. Feedback goes to the discussions or museoss@meta.com, and Meta's docs and developer blog carry dated posts (8 of 25). Day-one support in vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, Transformers, llama.cpp, MLX and Unsloth with Meta's own recipes, though SGLang's is a dev image and TensorRT-LLM's a feature branch (12 of 15). Current dependencies (Transformers 5.19), but no CI visible to us (4 of 10). 30 + 6 + 8 + 12 + 4 = 60.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Ember | Muse Spark Open | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 42 | Muse Spark Open +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 60 | 61 | Muse Spark Open +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 69 | Muse Ember +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 64 | 44 | Muse Ember +20 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 50 | Muse Spark Open +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 46 | 60 | Muse Spark Open +14 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 53 | 53 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.8/100 | D 53.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Ember | Muse Spark Open |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Meta | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.meta.ai/v1 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed model, used through Meta Model API and Muse Code under the Meta Model API Terms of Service (last updated 9 October 2026). No open weights; Meta's open-weight models are Muse Spark Open and Muse Glimmer | Muse Model Licence (source-available weights, not an OSI licence), free of charge with an attribution notice, a separate agreement with Meta before Model as a Service by a licensee group above $20M gross revenue, and the Muse Spark Open Usage Policy |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-09 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
How the scores have moved
Muse Ember
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Muse Ember
A cheap, capable model for the repeated parts of agent work, at $0.10 and $0.50 per million tokens with a 1M context and Meta's figures putting it level with Claude Haiku 5.5 on fewer tokens. Launched today on an API with no readable status page, SLA or deprecation policy, and closed, with no weights.
Muse Spark Open
Muse Spark Open runs on the owner's hardware in seven runtimes, with OpenAI-compatible servers in vLLM and SGLang, standard tool calls, a 1M-token context and Meta's own serving docs. Serving the 537 GB NVFP4 checkpoint takes four B300 GPUs, Meta's download is gated by manual review, and the licence adds attribution and a revenue threshold for model resellers.
Before you call either
Muse Ember
- Call https://api.meta.ai/v1/responses (or /chat/completions or /messages) with model muse-ember-1.0 and a bearer MODEL_API_KEY
- Set the effort explicitly, reasoning.effort on Responses or reasoning_effort on Chat Completions. It defaults to max, and none isn't accepted; minimal or low suits classification and routing
- Keep input under 200K tokens a request, cached tokens and previous_response_id history included, or the whole request bills at the long-context rate
- Use it for sub-agents and bounded repeated tasks, and a larger Muse model for the plan, as Meta advises
- Use strict structured output for extraction and routing steps
- In Claude Code, map the haiku alias and sub-agent model to muse-ember-1.0, per Meta's guide
Muse Spark Open
- Start vLLM or SGLang with
--reasoning-parser muse --tool-call-parser muse(vLLM also--enable-auto-tool-choice), or tool calls come back as raw text - Set
reasoning_efforttolowormediumfor short tasks. The default isxhigh, reasoning can't be turned off, and other values return an error - Stop only on
<|eot|>and end of text. Stopping on<|eom|>cuts off tool calls and final answers - Stream long generations and leave
max_tokensroom for reasoning, orcontentcan come back empty withfinish_reasonlength - Don't call Meta Model API for this model. Use a self-hosted server or a hosted provider's model string, such as
meta-models/muse-spark-open
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Ember or Muse Spark Open?
Muse Spark Open scores 53.4 (D) on agent readiness against Muse Ember's 51.8 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Muse Ember leads on security & auth.
Do Muse Ember and Muse Spark Open need an API key?
Muse Ember needs an API key. Muse Spark Open needs no key.
Can an agent call Muse Ember and Muse Spark Open without installing anything?
Muse Ember has a hosted endpoint at https://api.meta.ai/v1. No hosted endpoint is listed for Muse Spark Open.
Other comparisons with Muse Ember or Muse Spark Open
- Amazon Bedrock vs Muse Ember
- Amazon Bedrock vs Muse Spark Open
- Claude API vs Muse Ember
- Claude API vs Muse Spark Open
- Antseed vs Muse Ember
- Antseed vs Muse Spark Open
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Muse Ember
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Muse Spark Open
- BlockRun.AI vs Muse Ember
- BlockRun.AI vs Muse Spark Open
- Cerebras Inference vs Muse Ember
- Cerebras Inference vs Muse Spark Open
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Muse Ember
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Muse Spark Open
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Muse Ember
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Muse Spark Open
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Muse Ember
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepInfra vs Muse Ember
- DeepInfra vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek API vs Muse Ember
- DeepSeek API vs Muse Spark Open
- Eden AI vs Muse Ember
- Eden AI vs Muse Spark Open
- Glimpse vs Muse Ember
- Glimpse vs Muse Spark Open
- Fireworks AI Inference vs Muse Ember
- Fireworks AI Inference vs Muse Spark Open
- Gemini Developer API vs Muse Ember
- Gemini Developer API vs Muse Spark Open
- GroqCloud vs Muse Ember
- GroqCloud vs Muse Spark Open
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Muse Ember
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Muse Spark Open
- Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Ember
- Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Spark Open
- Jais 3 vs Muse Ember
- Jais 3 vs Muse Spark Open
- Meta Model API vs Muse Ember
- Meta Model API vs Muse Spark Open
- MiniMax API vs Muse Ember
- MiniMax API vs Muse Spark Open
- Mistral AI API vs Muse Ember
- Mistral AI API vs Muse Spark Open
- Muse Ember vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Muse Ember vs Novita AI
- Muse Ember vs OpenAI API
- Muse Ember vs OpenRouter
- Muse Ember vs Prism Inference
- Muse Ember vs Router.com (Ramp Router)
- Muse Ember vs Beam 1.0
- Muse Ember vs RouterPlus
- Muse Ember vs SambaCloud
- Muse Ember vs SiliconFlow
- Muse Ember vs Simplismart
- Muse Ember vs StepFun API
- Muse Ember vs SWE-2 Flash
- Muse Ember vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Muse Ember vs Together AI Inference
- Muse Ember vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Muse Ember vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Muse Ember vs xAI API (Grok)
- Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Muse Spark Open vs Novita AI
- Muse Spark Open vs OpenAI API
- Muse Spark Open vs OpenRouter
- Muse Spark Open vs Prism Inference
- Muse Spark Open vs Router.com (Ramp Router)
- Muse Spark Open vs Beam 1.0
- Muse Spark Open vs RouterPlus
- Muse Spark Open vs SambaCloud
- Muse Spark Open vs SiliconFlow
- Muse Spark Open vs Simplismart
- Muse Spark Open vs StepFun API
- Muse Spark Open vs SWE-2 Flash
- Muse Spark Open vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Muse Spark Open vs Together AI Inference
- Muse Spark Open vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Muse Spark Open vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Muse Spark Open vs xAI API (Grok)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-ember-vs-muse-spark-open.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-ember.json·/api/v1/tools/muse-spark-open.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-ember muse-spark-open(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-ember", "b": "muse-spark-open"}at/mcp, no key