Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
Muse Ember vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
Tencent Cloud TokenHub scores 59.5 (C) on agent readiness against Muse Ember's 51.8 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 871 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that hand out many small, bounded tasks (sub-agents, tool loops, routing, extraction over thousands of files) and want a cheap multimodal model with a 1M context behind the same API as a bigger Muse model.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Tencent Cloud TokenHub loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No weights and no parameter count published, so it can't be run locally
Best for Teams in or near Tencent Cloud that want one key and bill for Tencent's Hy models and Chinese open-weight models (DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, MiniMax, Qwen, MiMo) with per-key limits and CNY billing.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 46 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 73 against 60
- Agent ergonomics, 83 against 72
- Security & auth, 71 against 64
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 73 against 46
Watch for
Sign-up needs a Tencent Cloud account with real-name verification. The international site answered with a bot check, so access from outside China was not established
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Maintenance & community Tencent Cloud TokenHub +27
Muse Ember 46
Model reading. Released 9 November 2026 (30). No deprecation policy or notice period found, per the platform reading (0 of 12). Dated launches on the API, the latest Muse Wonder on 12 October and Muse Ember on 9 November (8 of 8). No Model API changelog; a help centre with tickets (8 of 15). No SDK of Meta's own (0 of 15, 0 of 10). 30 + 0 + 8 + 8 + 0 = 46.
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 73
Closed service, read on the model lines. The newest release note is dated 24 October 2026 and the price page was updated on 31 October (30). The four retirement notices read gave 21 to 33 days, and eligible callers are switched to a successor at its price. No minimum notice period is written, and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (directly supplied) was moved to the 1017 version under the same ids on 17 October 2026 in a notice dated two days later (7 of 12). 18 retirement notices from 21 April to 22 October 2026, 12 of them since 3 August (3 of 8). Dated release notes and announcements, ticket and phone support around the clock and a Q&A community (13 of 15). Replies on the THCLI repository were not sampled (3 of 10). Tencent Cloud SDK 3.0 in several languages covers the control plane and tencent-tokenhub-cli 1.0.2 was published on 30 October 2026. No inference SDK of its own (12 of 15). The CLI has four releases since 15 September 2026, lists no runtime dependencies and needs Node.js 18 or later. CI not checked (5 of 10).
Payments & pricing Tencent Cloud TokenHub +15
Muse Ember 20
Published rubric. No payment protocol (0). Per-token prices for both tiers published without a login, read 9 November (20). No free API allowance found; billing needs a card, per the platform reading (0). Browser sign-up (0). 0 + 20 + 0 + 0 = 20.
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 35
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-token prices for every model are public in CNY for Guangzhou and Singapore, with DeepSeek's peak and off-peak rates (20). Each account gets 1M free tokens per language model, valid for a year, in a campaign running to 31 December 2026. No card is mentioned, but the account needs real-name verification, so this line takes 15 of 20. A person signs up and completes real-name verification in a browser. Keys can then be created in code or by thcli auth login, but only from that account (0).
Schema & documentation Tencent Cloud TokenHub +13
Muse Ember 60
Model reading. No OpenAPI file; the Markdown reference is the contract, per the meta-model-api listing (0). llms.txt and Markdown copies of every page (10). The Muse Ember page and choose-a-model page say what to hand it and what not to (hard single-shot coding, knowledge-heavy questions, visual coding), with model ID, inputs, context, max output and effort range (18 of 20). JSON Schema tools and output, reasoning effort an enum, per the platform reading (12 of 15). Curl, Python and TypeScript examples and the platform's error guide (15). A versioned model ID and a dated launch post, with no API changelog (5 of 15). 0 + 10 + 18 + 12 + 15 + 5 = 60.
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 73
Router, scored on the API lines. No OpenAPI file for the inference routes. Field pages document the OpenAI Chat Completions, OpenAI Responses and Anthropic Messages formats as TokenHub implements them, and the control plane is a Tencent Cloud API 3.0 service (version 2026-03-22) with typed parameters, API Explorer and SDKs (12 of 25). An llms.txt at cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1823/llms.txt links a Markdown copy of each docs page (10). The docs say which models support thinking, tools, structured output and caching, how TokenHub departs from each standard protocol, and which DeepSeek model suits which job. The quickstart's examples still use deepseek-v3, which is not in the model list, and Qwen3.5 stays in the list with a past shutdown date (13 of 20). Protocol pages list each field with type, required flag and default, and control-plane parameters carry enums and required flags (10 of 15). Examples in curl, Python, Node.js, Java and Go, and an error page listing 30 codes with HTTP status, cause and fix (14 of 15). Paths carry /v1, release notes are dated monthly from 7 April to 24 October 2026, and the control-plane API has a dated history of 26 releases to 18 September 2026 (14 of 15).
Agent ergonomics Tencent Cloud TokenHub +11
Muse Ember 72
Model reading. Tool calls, parallel calls, computer use and search grounding, with tool_choice limited to auto per the platform reading (15 of 20). Strict structured output (15). Automatic prompt caching, cached input at 4% of the input price (15). A 1,048,576-token context, but requests over 200K input tokens bill at three times the rate for the whole request (12 of 15). No batch endpoint (0). No SDK of Meta's own; OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs against compatible endpoints (0). OpenAI-style errors with fixes and retryable codes (15). 15 + 15 + 15 + 12 + 0 + 0 + 15 = 72.
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 83
Router, read on the model lines. Function calling is marked on most chat models in the model list, with behaviour depending on the model routed (14 of 20). Structured output is marked per model and missing on the MiniMax and Qwen models, and an unsupported response_format returns code 400006 (12 of 15). Cache-hit prices are published per model, Kimi K3.1 Pro lists five-minute and one-hour cache writes, and a guide covers prompt_cache_key and the X-Session-ID header for instance affinity (14 of 15). Most listed chat models have contexts of one million tokens, a judgement call since a router has no default model (15). Batch at half price covers only Hy3 and Hy4 preview, reads and writes JSONL in the customer's own COS bucket and is documented for the Guangzhou endpoint (5 of 10). No TokenHub inference SDK. The OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs work with a changed base URL, and Tencent Cloud SDK 3.0 and the thcli CLI cover the control plane (8 of 10). Errors return a code, English and Chinese messages, the source, the upstream code and status and a request ID, and stream errors arrive as SSE error frames (15 of 15).
Security & auth Tencent Cloud TokenHub +7
Muse Ember 64
Platform readings are the meta-model-api listing's of 4 November. Team keys, named, revocable, no scopes (20 of 30). Standard mode only, so content isn't used to train Meta models under the terms, with safety use reserved (17 of 20). Retention 'as needed' with zero retention through sales (10 of 15). Usage dashboard by model, no per-call log (5 of 15). No security.txt on dev.meta.ai, a bug bounty and a security commitments page, no named certification (12 of 20). 20 + 17 + 10 + 5 + 12 = 64.
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 71
Router, read on the model lines. Bearer keys can be limited to chosen models and inference services, up to 200 source IP ranges and daily, monthly or total token quotas, can be disabled or deleted, and can be created in code through CreateApiKey with signed Tencent Cloud credentials. Keys are long-lived with no expiry setting or built-in rotation (26 of 30). Clause 2.17 of the terms says inputs are not used to train Tencent Cloud's own models, and the FAQ says data is not used for training. Inputs to third-party deployed models (DeepSeek's directly supplied ones) go to DeepSeek under its terms (14 of 20). Clause 2.14 keeps data only as long as the service needs, with no periods stated. When a customer asks for generated content without AI labels, Tencent Cloud keeps logs of who received it for at least six months. No zero-retention option was found (7 of 15). Per-call audit logs (request ID, key, client IP, status, tokens, latency) and optional full call logs go to the customer's CLS, billed separately, with usage by key and a monitoring dashboard (14 of 15). No security.txt on cloud.tencent.com, www.tencent.com or tokenhub.tencentmaas.com (404). Tencent's bug bounty through TSRC lists Tencent Cloud in scope. No certification for TokenHub was checked (10 of 20).
Reliability Tencent Cloud TokenHub +6
Muse Ember 40
Model reading, for the surface it's called on, Meta Model API. No status page with readable history, per the meta-model-api listing's 4 November check (0), so no readable incident history (5). Rate limits published per team and per model, 3,000 RPM and 4,000,000 TPM for muse-ember-1.0, read 9 November (15). 429 and 503 with Retry-After, backoff guidance and rate-limit headers, per the meta-model-api listing (15). No SLA found (0). Muse Ember carries no preview label, but the API opened as a public preview in July and no general-availability notice was found, so half, as for the platform (5). 0 + 5 + 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 = 40.
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 46
Hosted reading. No public status page was found. status.cloud.tencent.com did not answer and the Tencent Cloud health dashboard documentation answered with a bot check (0). With no page there is no incident record to read (5 of 30). The announcements carry one incident, DeepSeek's directly supplied models unavailable from 9:06 to 13:04 Beijing time on 15 October 2026 after a fault at DeepSeek, compensated with vouchers. Rate limits are per model, shown in the console and returned by DescribeModelQuota. The public docs give numbers only for batch jobs (20 created a minute, 10 active), image models (5 concurrent) and DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pro (2,500 and 500 concurrent), with the rules for self-serve increases (8 of 15). Six 429 codes separate RPM, TPM, TPD, concurrency and upstream capacity, 429s may carry Retry-After and the docs advise exponential backoff. No idempotency guidance, though inference calls are not writes (13 of 15). The TokenHub SLA promises 99.5% monthly availability with vouchers of 10, 25 or 50 per cent of the month's fee. It excludes free use and third-party deployed models such as DeepSeek's directly supplied ones (10). Generally available since 7 April 2026, with some models marked preview (10).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Ember | Tencent Cloud TokenHub | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 46 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +6 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 60 | 73 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +13 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 83 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 64 | 71 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +7 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 35 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 46 | 73 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +27 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 53 | 54 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | D 51.8/100 | C 59.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Ember | Tencent Cloud TokenHub |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model router |
| Vendor | Meta | Tencent Cloud |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.meta.ai/v1 | https://tokenhub.tencentmaas.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed model, used through Meta Model API and Muse Code under the Meta Model API Terms of Service (last updated 9 October 2026). No open weights; Meta's open-weight models are Muse Spark Open and Muse Glimmer | Proprietary service under the TokenHub Terms of Service, the TokenHub SLA and the Tencent Cloud Service Agreement, with a special note for third-party deployed models. The tencent-tokenhub-cli package is Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-09 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-02 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | none | 204 npm/wk |
Verdicts
Muse Ember
A cheap, capable model for the repeated parts of agent work, at $0.10 and $0.50 per million tokens with a 1M context and Meta's figures putting it level with Claude Haiku 5.5 on fewer tokens. Launched today on an API with no readable status page, SLA or deprecation policy, and closed, with no weights.
Tencent Cloud TokenHub
Keys can be limited to chosen models, source IPs and token quotas, errors name their source and code, and a 99.5% SLA covers paid use of models Tencent runs. Sign-up needs a Tencent Cloud account with real-name verification, prices are in CNY, no public status page was found, and 18 model retirement notices ran from April to October 2026.
Before you call either
Muse Ember
- Call https://api.meta.ai/v1/responses (or /chat/completions or /messages) with model muse-ember-1.0 and a bearer MODEL_API_KEY
- Set the effort explicitly, reasoning.effort on Responses or reasoning_effort on Chat Completions. It defaults to max, and none isn't accepted; minimal or low suits classification and routing
- Keep input under 200K tokens a request, cached tokens and previous_response_id history included, or the whole request bills at the long-context rate
- Use it for sub-agents and bounded repeated tasks, and a larger Muse model for the plan, as Meta advises
- Use strict structured output for extraction and routing steps
- In Claude Code, map the haiku alias and sub-agent model to muse-ember-1.0, per Meta's guide
Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Use
https://tokenhub.tencentmaas.com/v1with keys made for Guangzhou andhttps://tokenhub-intl.tencentmaas.com/v1with keys made for Singapore. Keys do not work across the two - Send the key as
Authorization: Beareron the OpenAI paths and asx-api-keyon/v1/messages - Parse
error.codeas a string or a number, since 429 codes can come back as integers, and wait forRetry-Afterbefore retrying - Take model ids from
GET /v1/modelsand watch forpre-offline. The quickstart'sdeepseek-v3example is not in the current model list - Expect DeepSeek prices to double on weekdays from 9am to noon and 2pm to 6pm Beijing time, when the peak rate applies
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Ember or Tencent Cloud TokenHub?
Tencent Cloud TokenHub scores 59.5 (C) on agent readiness against Muse Ember's 51.8 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Do Muse Ember and Tencent Cloud TokenHub need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Muse Ember and Tencent Cloud TokenHub without installing anything?
Yes. Muse Ember has a hosted endpoint at https://api.meta.ai/v1 and Tencent Cloud TokenHub at https://tokenhub.tencentmaas.com/v1.
Other comparisons with Muse Ember or Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Amazon Bedrock vs Muse Ember
- Amazon Bedrock vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Claude API vs Muse Ember
- Claude API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Antseed vs Muse Ember
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Muse Ember
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- BlockRun.AI vs Muse Ember
- BlockRun.AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Cerebras Inference vs Muse Ember
- Cerebras Inference vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Muse Ember
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Muse Ember
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Muse Ember
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- DeepInfra vs Muse Ember
- DeepInfra vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- DeepSeek API vs Muse Ember
- DeepSeek API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Eden AI vs Muse Ember
- Glimpse vs Muse Ember
- Glimpse vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Fireworks AI Inference vs Muse Ember
- Fireworks AI Inference vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Gemini Developer API vs Muse Ember
- Gemini Developer API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- GroqCloud vs Muse Ember
- GroqCloud vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Muse Ember
- Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Ember
- Inkling 2 Small vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Jais 3 vs Muse Ember
- Jais 3 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Meta Model API vs Muse Ember
- Meta Model API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- MiniMax API vs Muse Ember
- MiniMax API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Mistral AI API vs Muse Ember
- Mistral AI API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Muse Ember vs Muse Spark Open
- Muse Ember vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Muse Ember vs Novita AI
- Muse Ember vs OpenAI API
- Muse Ember vs OpenRouter
- Muse Ember vs Prism Inference
- Muse Ember vs Router.com (Ramp Router)
- Muse Ember vs Beam 1.0
- Muse Ember vs RouterPlus
- Muse Ember vs SambaCloud
- Muse Ember vs SiliconFlow
- Muse Ember vs Simplismart
- Muse Ember vs StepFun API
- Muse Ember vs SWE-2 Flash
- Muse Ember vs Together AI Inference
- Muse Ember vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Muse Ember vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Muse Ember vs xAI API (Grok)
- Muse Spark Open vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Novita AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- OpenAI API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- OpenRouter vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Beam 1.0 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- SambaCloud vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- SiliconFlow vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Simplismart vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- StepFun API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- SWE-2 Flash vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Tencent Cloud TokenHub vs Together AI Inference
- Tencent Cloud TokenHub vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Tencent Cloud TokenHub vs xAI API (Grok)
- Antseed vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Eden AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- LiteLLM vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Router.com (Ramp Router) vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- RouterPlus vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Tencent Cloud TokenHub vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Prism Inference vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-ember-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-ember.json·/api/v1/tools/tencent-tokenhub.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-ember tencent-tokenhub(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-ember", "b": "tencent-tokenhub"}at/mcp, no key