Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
Muse Ember vs SiliconFlow
Muse Ember scores 51.8 (D) on agent readiness against SiliconFlow's 42.9 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. SiliconFlow leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 871 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that hand out many small, bounded tasks (sub-agents, tool loops, routing, extraction over thousands of files) and want a cheap multimodal model with a 1M context behind the same API as a bigger Muse model.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 40 against 33
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 60
- Security & auth, 64 against 39
- Maintenance & community, 46 against 37
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where SiliconFlow loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No weights and no parameter count published, so it can't be run locally
Best for Agents that want recent open-weight chat models, plus image, video and speech, behind one OpenAI-style key at low per-token prices, and can live without a status page or SLA.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 65 against 60
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
Watch for
No status page, incident history or SLA was found, and the terms disclaim any uptime or availability commitment
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Security & auth Muse Ember +25
Muse Ember 64
Platform readings are the meta-model-api listing's of 4 November. Team keys, named, revocable, no scopes (20 of 30). Standard mode only, so content isn't used to train Meta models under the terms, with safety use reserved (17 of 20). Retention 'as needed' with zero retention through sales (10 of 15). Usage dashboard by model, no per-call log (5 of 15). No security.txt on dev.meta.ai, a bug bounty and a security commitments page, no named certification (12 of 20). 20 + 17 + 10 + 5 + 12 = 64.
SiliconFlow 39
SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November. Per the 9 October check, not re-read on 5 November. Model reading. Bearer keys created in the console. No scopes, expiry, per-key limits or rotation are documented, and deletion of a key was not confirmed because the console was not read (15 of 30). The terms say Interaction Data is used only to supply the service and is not used or disclosed without authorisation. No statement on model training was found (12 of 20). The terms say there is no obligation to store Interaction Data. No retention period or zero-retention option is stated, and clause 5.11 allows communications to be recorded and passed to the authorities (6 of 15). The release note of 26 March 2026 describes usage and cost breakdowns and invoice export, and the pricing FAQ says monthly spending limits can be set. No audit log was found (6 of 15). No security.txt (404), disclosure policy, bug bounty or named certification was found on the pages read. The product introduction says the service complies with industry standards and names none (0 of 20). 15+12+6+6+0 = 39.
Payments & pricing SiliconFlow +15
Muse Ember 20
Published rubric. No payment protocol (0). Per-token prices for both tiers published without a login, read 9 November (20). No free API allowance found; billing needs a card, per the platform reading (0). Browser sign-up (0). 0 + 20 + 0 + 0 = 20.
SiliconFlow 35
SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November. Per the 9 October check, not re-read on 5 November. No machine payment protocol (0). Per-token, per-image and per-video prices on the pricing page, read without a login, such as DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at $0.15 in and $0.60 out per 1M tokens (20). $1 in free credits for a new account. Whether a card is needed was not established, so this line takes 15 of 20. A person signs up in a browser with a Google or GitHub account, and no key API was found (0). 0+20+15+0 = 35.
Agent ergonomics Muse Ember +12
Muse Ember 72
Model reading. Tool calls, parallel calls, computer use and search grounding, with tool_choice limited to auto per the platform reading (15 of 20). Strict structured output (15). Automatic prompt caching, cached input at 4% of the input price (15). A 1,048,576-token context, but requests over 200K input tokens bill at three times the rate for the whole request (12 of 15). No batch endpoint (0). No SDK of Meta's own; OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs against compatible endpoints (0). OpenAI-style errors with fixes and retryable codes (15). 15 + 15 + 15 + 12 + 0 + 0 + 15 = 72.
SiliconFlow 60
SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November. Per the 9 October check, not re-read on 5 November. Model reading of the checklist (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs, errors). OpenAI-style tools with up to 128 functions, and each model page says whether Tools are supported. No tool_choice field is in the chat schema and the guide is out of date (12 of 20). response_format of json_object. The DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash page says Structured Outputs are not supported (7 of 15). Cached input prices are published per model. No caching guide was found (8 of 15). Context listed as 1049K tokens on eleven chat models on the home page, with output up to 393K (14 of 15). /files and /batches are in the OpenAPI file for chat completions only, with no guide in the English index, no batch price and a window description that contradicts itself (5 of 10). No official SDK. The OpenAI and Anthropic clients work with a changed base URL (6 of 10). Errors carry an HTTP status, a numeric code and a message. No list of codes was found (8 of 15). 12+7+8+14+5+6+8 = 60.
Maintenance & community Muse Ember +9
Muse Ember 46
Model reading. Released 9 November 2026 (30). No deprecation policy or notice period found, per the platform reading (0 of 12). Dated launches on the API, the latest Muse Wonder on 12 October and Muse Ember on 9 November (8 of 8). No Model API changelog; a help centre with tickets (8 of 15). No SDK of Meta's own (0 of 15, 0 of 10). 30 + 0 + 8 + 8 + 0 = 46.
SiliconFlow 37
SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November. Model reading, per the 9 October check, not re-read on 5 November. Hy4-preview is listed as released on 14 September 2026, 52 days before this check, and no later model or API change was recorded; blog post dates record no API change (20). No notice period is stated. Six removal notices from 31 December 2025 to 11 June 2026 are dated the day of removal, and two in March 2026 gave six and seven days (2 of 12). The release notes record about 60 model ids removed in ten notices over the last twelve months (2 of 8). The release notes stop at 11 June 2026 while nine chat models were added afterwards. Support is by email and Discord (6 of 15). Replies in the support channels were not examined (2 of 10). No official SDK. The langchain-siliconflow repository in the vendor's GitHub organisation was last changed on 12 December 2025 (version 0.2.3), confirmed from a clone on 5 November (3 of 15). The API description and two guides are out of date (2 of 10). 20+2+2+6+2+3+2 = 37.
Reliability Muse Ember +7
Muse Ember 40
Model reading, for the surface it's called on, Meta Model API. No status page with readable history, per the meta-model-api listing's 4 November check (0), so no readable incident history (5). Rate limits published per team and per model, 3,000 RPM and 4,000,000 TPM for muse-ember-1.0, read 9 November (15). 429 and 503 with Retry-After, backoff guidance and rate-limit headers, per the meta-model-api listing (15). No SLA found (0). Muse Ember carries no preview label, but the API opened as a public preview in July and no general-availability notice was found, so half, as for the platform (5). 0 + 5 + 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 = 40.
SiliconFlow 33
SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November. Per the 9 October check, not re-read on 5 November. Hosted reading. No status page is linked from the site, the docs index or any page read (0). With no page there is no incident record to read (5 of 30). Rate limits are published with numbers by spend tier, from 1,000 requests and 40,000 tokens a minute at L0 to 10,000 and 2,000,000 at L5, on a page served only in Chinese, with per-model figures left to the console (12 of 15). The 429 body is documented and names the limit reached, and the docs say to wait and retry. No Retry-After header, backoff figures or idempotency guidance were found (6 of 15). No SLA found. Clause 4.2 of the terms disclaims any uptime or availability commitment (0). The serverless API is generally available, and /systemone is marked alpha (10). 0+5+12+6+0+10 = 33.
Schema & documentation SiliconFlow +5
Muse Ember 60
Model reading. No OpenAPI file; the Markdown reference is the contract, per the meta-model-api listing (0). llms.txt and Markdown copies of every page (10). The Muse Ember page and choose-a-model page say what to hand it and what not to (hard single-shot coding, knowledge-heavy questions, visual coding), with model ID, inputs, context, max output and effort range (18 of 20). JSON Schema tools and output, reasoning effort an enum, per the platform reading (12 of 15). Curl, Python and TypeScript examples and the platform's error guide (15). A versioned model ID and a dated launch post, with no API changelog (5 of 15). 0 + 10 + 18 + 12 + 15 + 5 = 60.
SiliconFlow 65
SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November. Per the 9 October check, not re-read on 5 November. Model reading. Public OpenAPI 3.0 file with 22 operations and 102 schemas, linked from llms.txt under the Chinese path only. Its chat model enum of 71 ids includes removed models and omits every model added since July 2026 (19 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown copy of each docs page (10). Guides for function calling, JSON mode, reasoning, prefix and FIM completion. The function calling guide lists only models the release notes show as removed, and its examples use DeepSeek-V2.5 (10 of 20). Typed parameters with 104 enums and required fields. response_format is typed as a bare string with an example (10 of 15). Curl and Python examples, an error page with seven HTTP codes and one body code, and 400, 401, 404, 429, 503 and 504 responses in the file (9 of 15). The file's version reads 1.0.0. The release notes are dated, stop at 11 June 2026 and since March 2026 record only model removals (7 of 15). 19+10+10+10+9+7 = 65.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Ember | SiliconFlow | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 33 | Muse Ember +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 60 | 65 | SiliconFlow +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 60 | Muse Ember +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 64 | 39 | Muse Ember +25 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 35 | SiliconFlow +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 46 | 37 | Muse Ember +9 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 53 | 52 | Muse Ember +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | D 51.8/100 | E 42.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Ember | SiliconFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Meta | SiliconFlow Labs Pte. Ltd. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.meta.ai/v1 | https://api.siliconflow.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed model, used through Meta Model API and Muse Code under the Meta Model API Terms of Service (last updated 9 October 2026). No open weights; Meta's open-weight models are Muse Spark Open and Muse Glimmer | Proprietary service under the SiliconFlow Terms of Use |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-09 | 2026-09-14 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-02 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Muse Ember
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Muse Ember
A cheap, capable model for the repeated parts of agent work, at $0.10 and $0.50 per million tokens with a 1M context and Meta's figures putting it level with Claude Haiku 5.5 on fewer tokens. Launched today on an API with no readable status page, SLA or deprecation policy, and closed, with no weights.
SiliconFlow
Per-token prices for every listed model are public, and one key reaches chat, embeddings, reranking, image, video and speech through OpenAI-style and Anthropic-style routes. No status page, SLA, security page or official SDK was found, release notes stop at 11 June 2026, and several model removals are dated the same day as their notice.
Before you call either
Muse Ember
- Call https://api.meta.ai/v1/responses (or /chat/completions or /messages) with model muse-ember-1.0 and a bearer MODEL_API_KEY
- Set the effort explicitly, reasoning.effort on Responses or reasoning_effort on Chat Completions. It defaults to max, and none isn't accepted; minimal or low suits classification and routing
- Keep input under 200K tokens a request, cached tokens and previous_response_id history included, or the whole request bills at the long-context rate
- Use it for sub-agents and bounded repeated tasks, and a larger Muse model for the plan, as Meta advises
- Use strict structured output for extraction and routing steps
- In Claude Code, map the haiku alias and sub-agent model to muse-ember-1.0, per Meta's guide
SiliconFlow
- Set the OpenAI client's base URL to
https://api.siliconflow.com/v1, or the Anthropic client's tohttps://api.siliconflow.com/, and send the key as a Bearer token - Take model ids from the model pages or
GET /v1/models, not from the OpenAPI enum or the function calling guide, which list removed models - Check the
modelfield of each response. On 11 June 2026 traffic for GLM-5 and Kimi-K2.5 was routed to successor models - Use
response_formatofjson_objectonly where the model page says JSON Mode is supported, and keepmax_tokensabout 10,000 below the context length - Set the Claude Code environment variables by hand. The automated route pipes a script from an Amazon S3 bucket into bash
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Ember or SiliconFlow?
Muse Ember scores 51.8 (D) on agent readiness against SiliconFlow's 42.9 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. SiliconFlow leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing.
Do Muse Ember and SiliconFlow need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Muse Ember and SiliconFlow without installing anything?
Yes. Muse Ember has a hosted endpoint at https://api.meta.ai/v1 and SiliconFlow at https://api.siliconflow.com/v1.
Other comparisons with Muse Ember or SiliconFlow
- Amazon Bedrock vs Muse Ember
- Amazon Bedrock vs SiliconFlow
- Claude API vs Muse Ember
- Claude API vs SiliconFlow
- Antseed vs Muse Ember
- Antseed vs SiliconFlow
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Muse Ember
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs SiliconFlow
- BlockRun.AI vs Muse Ember
- BlockRun.AI vs SiliconFlow
- Cerebras Inference vs Muse Ember
- Cerebras Inference vs SiliconFlow
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Muse Ember
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs SiliconFlow
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Muse Ember
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs SiliconFlow
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Muse Ember
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs SiliconFlow
- DeepInfra vs Muse Ember
- DeepInfra vs SiliconFlow
- DeepSeek API vs Muse Ember
- DeepSeek API vs SiliconFlow
- Eden AI vs Muse Ember
- Eden AI vs SiliconFlow
- Glimpse vs Muse Ember
- Glimpse vs SiliconFlow
- Fireworks AI Inference vs Muse Ember
- Fireworks AI Inference vs SiliconFlow
- Gemini Developer API vs Muse Ember
- Gemini Developer API vs SiliconFlow
- GroqCloud vs Muse Ember
- GroqCloud vs SiliconFlow
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Muse Ember
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs SiliconFlow
- Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Ember
- Inkling 2 Small vs SiliconFlow
- Jais 3 vs Muse Ember
- Jais 3 vs SiliconFlow
- Meta Model API vs Muse Ember
- Meta Model API vs SiliconFlow
- MiniMax API vs Muse Ember
- MiniMax API vs SiliconFlow
- Mistral AI API vs Muse Ember
- Mistral AI API vs SiliconFlow
- Muse Ember vs Muse Spark Open
- Muse Ember vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Muse Ember vs Novita AI
- Muse Ember vs OpenAI API
- Muse Ember vs OpenRouter
- Muse Ember vs Prism Inference
- Muse Ember vs Router.com (Ramp Router)
- Muse Ember vs Beam 1.0
- Muse Ember vs RouterPlus
- Muse Ember vs SambaCloud
- Muse Ember vs Simplismart
- Muse Ember vs StepFun API
- Muse Ember vs SWE-2 Flash
- Muse Ember vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Muse Ember vs Together AI Inference
- Muse Ember vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Muse Ember vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Muse Ember vs xAI API (Grok)
- Muse Spark Open vs SiliconFlow
- Novita AI vs SiliconFlow
- OpenAI API vs SiliconFlow
- OpenRouter vs SiliconFlow
- Prism Inference vs SiliconFlow
- Router.com (Ramp Router) vs SiliconFlow
- Beam 1.0 vs SiliconFlow
- RouterPlus vs SiliconFlow
- SambaCloud vs SiliconFlow
- SiliconFlow vs Simplismart
- SiliconFlow vs StepFun API
- SiliconFlow vs SWE-2 Flash
- SiliconFlow vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- SiliconFlow vs Together AI Inference
- SiliconFlow vs Vercel AI Gateway
- SiliconFlow vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- SiliconFlow vs xAI API (Grok)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs SiliconFlow
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-ember-vs-siliconflow.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-ember.json·/api/v1/tools/siliconflow.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-ember siliconflow(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-ember", "b": "siliconflow"}at/mcp, no key