# Muse Ember vs SiliconFlow (slim)

> Muse Ember scores 51.8 (D) to SiliconFlow's 42.9 (E) for llm inference. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-ember-vs-siliconflow.md (~6,550 tokens) · this version ~1,080 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-ember-vs-siliconflow.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-ember-vs-siliconflow
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-09
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Muse Ember scores 51.8 (D) on agent readiness against SiliconFlow's 42.9 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. SiliconFlow leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing. Both do llm inference.

- Muse Ember: D 51.8, rank #1017 of 1515 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/muse-ember.min.md
- SiliconFlow: E 42.9, rank #1271 of 1515 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/siliconflow.min.md
- Muse Ember, good for Agents that hand out many small, bounded tasks (sub-agents, tool loops, routing, extraction over thousands of files) and want a cheap multimodal model with a 1M context behind the same API as a bigger Muse model. Ahead on Reliability, 40 against 33; Agent ergonomics, 72 against 60; Security & auth, 64 against 39; Maintenance & community, 46 against 37. Also No incidents deducted, where SiliconFlow loses 3 points for them.
- SiliconFlow, good for Agents that want recent open-weight chat models, plus image, video and speech, behind one OpenAI-style key at low per-token prices, and can live without a status page or SLA. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 65 against 60; Payments & pricing, 35 against 20.

| Category | Muse Ember | SiliconFlow |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 40 | 33 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 60 | 65 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 72 | 60 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 64 | 39 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 46 | 37 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 53 | 52 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Muse Ember | SiliconFlow |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Meta | SiliconFlow Labs Pte. Ltd. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.meta.ai/v1` | `https://api.siliconflow.com/v1` |
| Transports |  | HTTP |
| Licence | Closed model, used through Meta Model API and Muse Code under the Meta Model API Terms of Service (last updated 9 October 2026). No open weights; Meta's open-weight models are Muse Spark Open and Muse Glimmer | Proprietary service under the SiliconFlow Terms of Use |
| Last release | 2026-11-09 | 2026-09-14 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-02 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Security & auth, Muse Ember +25: Muse Ember 64 (Platform readings are the meta-model-api listing's of 4 November.); SiliconFlow 39 (SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November.)
- Payments & pricing, SiliconFlow +15: Muse Ember 20 (Published rubric.); SiliconFlow 35 (SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November.)
- Agent ergonomics, Muse Ember +12: Muse Ember 72 (Model reading.); SiliconFlow 60 (SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November.)
- Maintenance & community, Muse Ember +9: Muse Ember 46 (Model reading.); SiliconFlow 37 (SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November.)
- Reliability, Muse Ember +7: Muse Ember 40 (Model reading, for the surface it's called on, Meta Model API.); SiliconFlow 33 (SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November.)
- Schema & documentation, SiliconFlow +5: Muse Ember 60 (Model reading.); SiliconFlow 65 (SiliconFlow's Terms of Use bar spiders, robots, scrapers and crawlers on the Platform, so its sites were not re-read on 5 November.)