Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
GroqCloud vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
GroqCloud scores 74.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Tencent Cloud TokenHub's 59.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Tencent Cloud TokenHub leads on schema & documentation. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 529 models comparisons
Which one, for what
GroqCloud BB
Best for Many small, latency-sensitive calls on open-weight models, routing, extraction and classification, and agents that need to start free.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 90 against 46
- Security & auth, 82 against 71
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Transparency & trust, 85 against 54
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where Tencent Cloud TokenHub loses 3 points for them
Watch for
Four model shutdown dates between 2026-07-17 and 2026-09-21, with no stated minimum notice
Best for Teams in or near Tencent Cloud that want one key and bill for Tencent's Hy models and Chinese open-weight models (DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, MiniMax, Qwen, MiMo) with per-key limits and CNY billing.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 73 against 64
Watch for
Sign-up needs a Tencent Cloud account with real-name verification. The international site answered with a bot check, so access from outside China was not established
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability GroqCloud +44
GroqCloud 90
Status page at groqstatus.com on incident.io, with components for the API, each production and preview model and the website (20). The page's RSS feed and the incident pages it links, read on 1 November, list three incidents in the 90-day window, all in October, and nothing since 12 October apart from a console maintenance on 18 October. On 10 October the enterprise-only preview MiniMax M2.7 had failed requests from data centre hardware issues from 10:09 to 16:14 UTC. The incident's header and impact record say degraded performance, while its Identified update set the model to partial outage and warned of failed requests. On 12 October console.groq.com returned 500 errors on metrics, /models and key creation from 03:17 to 03:38, and the vendor said inference requests were not affected. On 12 October MiniMax M2.7 had a partial outage from 18:17 to 18:36. None took down a core API for an hour, since the six-hour incident hit one enterprise preview model that the status page describes as for evaluation only, so minor incidents only (20). A stricter reading would count it as a major and give 10. Limits published per model, 30 requests a minute, 1,000 a day and 8,000 tokens a minute on gpt-oss for the free plan, re-read on 1 November (15). 429 carries retry-after, x-ratelimit-* headers come on every response, and the errors page says to wait before retrying a 503 and that a 502 may clear on retry (15). The Performance Tier, enterprise only, lists a 99.9% availability SLA with details in the offline agreement, per the 6 October check, not re-read on 1 November (10). gpt-oss and Whisper models are production, Qwen 3.8 27B, MiniMax M2.7 and Muse Spark Open are previews (10). 20+20+15+15+10+10 = 90.
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 46
Hosted reading. No public status page was found. status.cloud.tencent.com did not answer and the Tencent Cloud health dashboard documentation answered with a bot check (0). With no page there is no incident record to read (5 of 30). The announcements carry one incident, DeepSeek's directly supplied models unavailable from 9:06 to 13:04 Beijing time on 15 October 2026 after a fault at DeepSeek, compensated with vouchers. Rate limits are per model, shown in the console and returned by DescribeModelQuota. The public docs give numbers only for batch jobs (20 created a minute, 10 active), image models (5 concurrent) and DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pro (2,500 and 500 concurrent), with the rules for self-serve increases (8 of 15). Six 429 codes separate RPM, TPM, TPD, concurrency and upstream capacity, 429s may carry Retry-After and the docs advise exponential backoff. No idempotency guidance, though inference calls are not writes (13 of 15). The TokenHub SLA promises 99.5% monthly availability with vouchers of 10, 25 or 50 per cent of the month's fee. It excludes free use and third-party deployed models such as DeepSeek's directly supplied ones (10). Generally available since 7 April 2026, with some models marked preview (10).
Transparency & trust GroqCloud +31
GroqCloud 85
Closed service with clear terms, SDKs Apache-2.0 (15). The data page agrees with the listing on retention and adds detail, batch files kept 30 days unless deleted, fine-tuning data kept until the customer deletes it, and SCCs for transfers. The services agreement bars training on inputs and outputs, and the DPA gives 15 days' notice of sub-processor changes to subscribers, both read on 6 October. The agreement extends zero retention to 'Eligible Customers' where the data page says all customers may enable it (26 of 30). Deprecations page with announcement and shutdown dates (20). All customer data in Google Cloud buckets in the US, per the data page. The DPA points to a sub-processor list at trust.groq.com/subprocessors, which needs JavaScript and wasn't read (10 of 20).
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 54
Closed service under the TokenHub Terms of Service (effective 14 September 2026), the SLA (23 April 2026), a special note on third-party deployed models and the Tencent Cloud Service Agreement, naming Tencent Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. The CLI is Apache-2.0 (18 of 30). The terms and the FAQ agree that inputs are processed on the customer's instructions and not used for training, and clause 2.14 limits retention to what the service needs without periods. The TokenHub privacy policy on privacy.qq.com renders only with JavaScript and was not read (15 of 30). Dated retirement notices, shutdown dates in the model list, a pre-offline status in /v1/models and a DiscontinuedAt field in the control API. Clause 6.3 refunds paid, unused tokens when a third-party model is removed. No minimum notice period is written (13 of 20). Clause 2.13 places processing generally in mainland China for the China site and in Singapore for the international site, and the third-party model list names DeepSeek's Hangzhou company with a link to its terms. No subprocessor list was found (13 of 20).
Security & auth GroqCloud +11
GroqCloud 82
Model reading. Bearer keys scoped to a project, with custom request limits per project and model permissions at organisation and project level. The security onboarding page advises rotating keys periodically and revoking them at once if compromise is suspected (30). The services agreement, read first-hand on 6 October and not re-read on 17 October, says Groq is not permitted to use inputs or outputs for training unless the customer grants permission (20). No retention by default, up to 30 days for reliability and abuse monitoring, and zero retention as a setting any customer can turn on in Data Controls, per the data page (15). Request logs, usage per project and a read-only Reader role (12 of 15). groq.com's security.txt holds a Contact line and nothing else, and the trust centre at trust.groq.com is a Vanta page that renders only with JavaScript, so certifications and any bug bounty are unchecked (5 of 20).
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 71
Router, read on the model lines. Bearer keys can be limited to chosen models and inference services, up to 200 source IP ranges and daily, monthly or total token quotas, can be disabled or deleted, and can be created in code through CreateApiKey with signed Tencent Cloud credentials. Keys are long-lived with no expiry setting or built-in rotation (26 of 30). Clause 2.17 of the terms says inputs are not used to train Tencent Cloud's own models, and the FAQ says data is not used for training. Inputs to third-party deployed models (DeepSeek's directly supplied ones) go to DeepSeek under its terms (14 of 20). Clause 2.14 keeps data only as long as the service needs, with no periods stated. When a customer asks for generated content without AI labels, Tencent Cloud keeps logs of who received it for at least six months. No zero-retention option was found (7 of 15). Per-call audit logs (request ID, key, client IP, status, tokens, latency) and optional full call logs go to the customer's CLS, billed separately, with usage by key and a monitoring dashboard (14 of 15). No security.txt on cloud.tencent.com, www.tencent.com or tokenhub.tencentmaas.com (404). Tencent's bug bounty through TSRC lists Tencent Cloud in scope. No certification for TokenHub was checked (10 of 20).
Schema & documentation Tencent Cloud TokenHub +9
GroqCloud 64
No OpenAPI document in the docs, and the SDK's .stats.yml carries only an endpoint count of 17, no spec URL (0). llms.txt at console.groq.com/llms.txt (10). Reference not read in full this run (15 of 20). Structured outputs have a Strict mode as well as Best-effort (15). The errors page lists 15 status codes with recovery advice, including 498 for Flex capacity and 424 for remote MCP auth, and the error object with message and type (14 of 15). The changelog at console.groq.com/docs/changelog, read on 1 November, is dated, but its newest entry is 18 April 2026 and it doesn't record the four shutdowns since July, which only the deprecations page carries (10 of 15).
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 73
Router, scored on the API lines. No OpenAPI file for the inference routes. Field pages document the OpenAI Chat Completions, OpenAI Responses and Anthropic Messages formats as TokenHub implements them, and the control plane is a Tencent Cloud API 3.0 service (version 2026-03-22) with typed parameters, API Explorer and SDKs (12 of 25). An llms.txt at cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1823/llms.txt links a Markdown copy of each docs page (10). The docs say which models support thinking, tools, structured output and caching, how TokenHub departs from each standard protocol, and which DeepSeek model suits which job. The quickstart's examples still use deepseek-v3, which is not in the model list, and Qwen3.5 stays in the list with a past shutdown date (13 of 20). Protocol pages list each field with type, required flag and default, and control-plane parameters carry enums and required flags (10 of 15). Examples in curl, Python, Node.js, Java and Go, and an error page listing 30 codes with HTTP status, cause and fix (14 of 15). Paths carry /v1, release notes are dated monthly from 7 April to 24 October 2026, and the control-plane API has a dated history of 26 releases to 18 September 2026 (14 of 15).
Payments & pricing GroqCloud +5
GroqCloud 40
No machine payment protocol (0). Per-token prices on the models page, read without a login, such as gpt-oss-120b at $0.15 in and $0.60 out per million (20). Free plan with no card (20). Console sign-up in a browser (0).
Tencent Cloud TokenHub 35
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-token prices for every model are public in CNY for Guangzhou and Singapore, with DeepSeek's peak and off-peak rates (20). Each account gets 1M free tokens per language model, valid for a year, in a campaign running to 31 December 2026. No card is mentioned, but the account needs real-name verification, so this line takes 15 of 20. A person signs up and completes real-name verification in a browser. Keys can then be created in code or by thcli auth login, but only from that account (0).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GroqCloud | Tencent Cloud TokenHub | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 90 | 46 | GroqCloud +44 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 64 | 73 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 80 | 83 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 71 | GroqCloud +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 35 | GroqCloud +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 72 | 73 | Tencent Cloud TokenHub +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 85 | 54 | GroqCloud +31 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | BB 74.5/100 | C 59.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GroqCloud | Tencent Cloud TokenHub |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model router |
| Vendor | Groq | Tencent Cloud |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.groq.com/openai/v1 | https://tokenhub.tencentmaas.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (SDKs) | Proprietary service under the TokenHub Terms of Service, the TokenHub SLA and the Tencent Cloud Service Agreement, with a special note for third-party deployed models. The tencent-tokenhub-cli package is Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-22 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-11-12 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 619 stars | 204 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | none |
How the scores have moved
Tencent Cloud TokenHub
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
GroqCloud
Free plan with no card, at 30 requests a minute and 1,000 a day on gpt-oss. Four model shutdown dates between 2026-07-17 and 2026-09-21, with no stated minimum notice.
Tencent Cloud TokenHub
Keys can be limited to chosen models, source IPs and token quotas, errors name their source and code, and a 99.5% SLA covers paid use of models Tencent runs. Sign-up needs a Tencent Cloud account with real-name verification, prices are in CNY, no public status page was found, and 18 model retirement notices ran from April to October 2026.
Before you call either
GroqCloud
- Call
/modelsat start-up. Four model ids stopped working between July and September - Read
retry-afteron a 429 and thex-ratelimit-remaining-tokensheader before the next call - Free plan allows 8,000 tokens a minute on gpt-oss, so keep prompts small or batch them
- Don't build on Qwen 3.8 27B. It's a preview and previews can go at short notice
- Treat a 498 as Flex capacity and retry later; server errors aren't billed
Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Use
https://tokenhub.tencentmaas.com/v1with keys made for Guangzhou andhttps://tokenhub-intl.tencentmaas.com/v1with keys made for Singapore. Keys do not work across the two - Send the key as
Authorization: Beareron the OpenAI paths and asx-api-keyon/v1/messages - Parse
error.codeas a string or a number, since 429 codes can come back as integers, and wait forRetry-Afterbefore retrying - Take model ids from
GET /v1/modelsand watch forpre-offline. The quickstart'sdeepseek-v3example is not in the current model list - Expect DeepSeek prices to double on weekdays from 9am to noon and 2pm to 6pm Beijing time, when the peak rate applies
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GroqCloud or Tencent Cloud TokenHub?
GroqCloud scores 74.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Tencent Cloud TokenHub's 59.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Tencent Cloud TokenHub leads on schema & documentation.
Do GroqCloud and Tencent Cloud TokenHub need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call GroqCloud and Tencent Cloud TokenHub without installing anything?
Yes. GroqCloud has a hosted endpoint at https://api.groq.com/openai/v1 and Tencent Cloud TokenHub at https://tokenhub.tencentmaas.com/v1.
Other comparisons with GroqCloud or Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Claude API vs GroqCloud
- Claude API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Antseed vs GroqCloud
- BlockRun.AI vs GroqCloud
- BlockRun.AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Cerebras Inference vs GroqCloud
- Cerebras Inference vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs GroqCloud
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs GroqCloud
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs GroqCloud
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- DeepInfra vs GroqCloud
- DeepInfra vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- DeepSeek API vs GroqCloud
- DeepSeek API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Glimpse vs GroqCloud
- Glimpse vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Fireworks AI Inference vs GroqCloud
- Fireworks AI Inference vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Gemini Developer API vs GroqCloud
- Gemini Developer API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- GroqCloud vs Jais 3
- GroqCloud vs Meta Model API
- GroqCloud vs MiniMax API
- GroqCloud vs Mistral AI API
- GroqCloud vs Muse Spark Open
- GroqCloud vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- GroqCloud vs Novita AI
- GroqCloud vs OpenAI API
- GroqCloud vs OpenRouter
- GroqCloud vs Prism Inference
- GroqCloud vs Router.com (Ramp Router)
- GroqCloud vs Beam 1.0
- GroqCloud vs RouterPlus
- GroqCloud vs SambaCloud
- GroqCloud vs SiliconFlow
- GroqCloud vs Simplismart
- GroqCloud vs StepFun API
- GroqCloud vs Together AI Inference
- GroqCloud vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Jais 3 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Meta Model API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- MiniMax API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Mistral AI API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Muse Spark Open vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Novita AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- OpenAI API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- OpenRouter vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Beam 1.0 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- SambaCloud vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- SiliconFlow vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Simplismart vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- StepFun API vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Tencent Cloud TokenHub vs Together AI Inference
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Prism Inference vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Antseed vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Router.com (Ramp Router) vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- RouterPlus vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Tencent Cloud TokenHub vs Vercel AI Gateway
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/groq-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/groq.json·/api/v1/tools/tencent-tokenhub.json - From a terminal
anchor compare groq tencent-tokenhub(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "groq", "b": "tencent-tokenhub"}at/mcp, no key