Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
GroqCloud vs OpenRouter
GroqCloud has a score of 75.7 (BB) against OpenRouter's 68.8 (B). Both do llm inference. The largest gap is reliability, 45 points.
Which one, for what
Pick GroqCloud for
- reliability (+45)
- security & auth (+17)
- transparency & trust (+12)
Pick OpenRouter for
- schema & documentation (+26)
- agent ergonomics (+5)
- maintenance & community (+12)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GroqCloud | OpenRouter | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 100 | 55 | GroqCloud +45 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 64 | 90 | OpenRouter +26 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 80 | 85 | OpenRouter +5 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 77 | 60 | GroqCloud +17 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 72 | 84 | OpenRouter +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 86 | 74 | GroqCloud +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 75.7 · BB | 68.8 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GroqCloud | OpenRouter |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model router |
| Vendor | Groq | OpenRouter |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.groq.com/openai/v1 | https://openrouter.ai/api/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (SDKs) | Apache-2.0 (SDKs) |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | 619 stars | 226 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
GroqCloud
Free plan with no card, at 30 requests a minute and 1,000 a day on gpt-oss. Four model shutdown dates between 2026-07-17 and 2026-09-21, with no stated minimum notice.
OpenRouter
Public OpenAPI document, llms.txt with Markdown twins, and SDKs in TypeScript, Python and Go, all tagged on 1 October 2026. No machine payment. USDC top-ups go to a prepaid balance.
Before you call either
GroqCloud
- Call
/modelsat start-up. Four model ids stopped working this quarter - Read
retry-afteron a 429 and thex-ratelimit-remaining-tokensheader before the next call - Free plan allows 8,000 tokens a minute on gpt-oss, so keep prompts small or batch them
- Don't build on Qwen 3.8 27B. It's a preview and previews can go at short notice
- Treat a 498 as Flex capacity and retry later; 5xx responses aren't billed
OpenRouter
- Set
provider.data_collection: "deny"orprovider.zdr: truewhen the prompt holds anything private - Pass a
modelslist so a failed provider falls through to the next one - Honour
Retry-Afteron 429 and 503, and check the stream body for errors even on a 200 - Set
max_priceso a routed request can't land on an expensive provider - Free models allow 50 requests a day until $10 of credit has been bought. Check
GET /api/v1/keyfor what's left
Other comparisons with GroqCloud or OpenRouter
- Claude API vs GroqCloud
- Claude API vs OpenRouter
- BlockRun.AI vs GroqCloud
- BlockRun.AI vs OpenRouter
- DeepSeek API vs GroqCloud
- DeepSeek API vs OpenRouter
- Gemini Developer API vs GroqCloud
- Gemini Developer API vs OpenRouter
- GroqCloud vs Mistral AI API
- GroqCloud vs OpenAI API
- Mistral AI API vs OpenRouter
- OpenAI API vs OpenRouter
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/groq.json·/api/v1/tools/openrouter.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/groq-vs-openrouter.md