Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs GroqCloud
GroqCloud scores 75.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Cohere Chat API (Command models)'s 64.7 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cohere Chat API (Command models) leads on schema & documentation. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 136 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Cohere Chat API (Command models) B
Good for Teams that want Command models for RAG with citations, tool use and multilingual work, and that may later move to a private deployment or Model Vault.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 64
Watch for
Production keys work like trial keys on Command A+, Reasoning, Translate and Vision. The docs send production use of those models to sales or to Model Vault
GroqCloud BB
Good for Many small, latency-sensitive calls on open-weight models, routing, extraction and classification, and agents that need to start free.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 100 against 64
- Agent ergonomics, 80 against 72
- Security & auth, 77 against 57
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
- Transparency & trust, 85 against 74
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
Four model shutdown dates between 2026-07-17 and 2026-09-21, with no stated minimum notice
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cohere Chat API (Command models) | GroqCloud | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 64 | 100 | GroqCloud +36 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 64 | Cohere Chat API (Command models) +20 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 80 | GroqCloud +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 77 | GroqCloud +20 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 40 | GroqCloud +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 72 | 72 | even |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 85 | GroqCloud +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 64.7 · B | 75.6 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cohere Chat API (Command models) | GroqCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Cohere | Groq |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.cohere.com/v2/chat | https://api.groq.com/openai/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Cohere's Commercial SaaS Agreement. The SDKs are MIT | Apache-2.0 (SDKs) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | 2026-09-21 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-04-08 | 2026-06-22 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-01 | 2025-11-12 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 619 stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Cohere Chat API (Command models)
A public OpenAPI file, Markdown twins of every docs page and SDKs in four languages make the Chat API easy for an agent to read. Production keys do not cover the four newest Command models, whose limits are set by sales, and the SaaS agreement lets Cohere share API data with third parties.
GroqCloud
Free plan with no card, at 30 requests a minute and 1,000 a day on gpt-oss. Four model shutdown dates between 2026-07-17 and 2026-09-21, with no stated minimum notice.
Before you call either
Cohere Chat API (Command models)
- Call
POST https://api.cohere.com/v2/chatwithAuthorization: bearer <key>.modelandmessagesare the only required fields - Use
command-a-03-2025,command-r-08-2024,command-r-plus-08-2024orcommand-r7b-12-2024for production traffic. Newer variants stay at trial limits on a production key - Keep a trial key under 20 chat requests a minute and 1,000 calls a month, and do not use it for commercial work
- Set
response_formatwith ajson_schemafor structured output, and tell the model to produce JSON when usingjson_objectwithout a schema - Ask the account Owner to turn off training under Data Controls in the dashboard before sending confidential prompts
GroqCloud
- Call
/modelsat start-up. Four model ids stopped working this quarter - Read
retry-afteron a 429 and thex-ratelimit-remaining-tokensheader before the next call - Free plan allows 8,000 tokens a minute on gpt-oss, so keep prompts small or batch them
- Don't build on Qwen 3.8 27B. It's a preview and previews can go at short notice
- Treat a 498 as Flex capacity and retry later; 5xx responses aren't billed
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cohere Chat API (Command models) or GroqCloud?
GroqCloud scores 75.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Cohere Chat API (Command models)'s 64.7 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cohere Chat API (Command models) leads on schema & documentation.
Do Cohere Chat API (Command models) and GroqCloud need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Cohere Chat API (Command models) and GroqCloud without installing anything?
Yes. Cohere Chat API (Command models) has a hosted endpoint at https://api.cohere.com/v2/chat and GroqCloud at https://api.groq.com/openai/v1.
Other comparisons with Cohere Chat API (Command models) or GroqCloud
- Claude API vs Cohere Chat API (Command models)
- Claude API vs GroqCloud
- Antseed vs Cohere Chat API (Command models)
- Antseed vs GroqCloud
- BlockRun.AI vs Cohere Chat API (Command models)
- BlockRun.AI vs GroqCloud
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Cohere Chat API (Command models)
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs GroqCloud
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Cohere Chat API (Command models)
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs GroqCloud
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs DeepInfra
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs DeepSeek API
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Gemini Developer API
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Mistral AI API
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Novita AI
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs OpenAI API
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs OpenRouter
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Prism Inference
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs SambaCloud
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs SiliconFlow
- DeepInfra vs GroqCloud
- DeepSeek API vs GroqCloud
- Gemini Developer API vs GroqCloud
- GroqCloud vs Mistral AI API
- GroqCloud vs Novita AI
- GroqCloud vs OpenAI API
- GroqCloud vs OpenRouter
- GroqCloud vs Prism Inference
- GroqCloud vs SambaCloud
- GroqCloud vs SiliconFlow
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cohere-chat-vs-groq.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cohere-chat.json·/api/v1/tools/groq.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cohere-chat groq(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cohere-chat", "b": "groq"}at/mcp, no key