Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run

Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Cohere Chat API (Command models) scores 64.7 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's 58.9 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads on payments & pricing. Both do llm inference.

Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 326 models comparisons

Which one, for what

Cohere Chat API (Command models) B

Best for Teams that want Command models for RAG with citations, tool use and multilingual work, and that may later move to a private deployment or Model Vault.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 64 against 58
  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 74
  • Agent ergonomics, 72 against 65
  • Security & auth, 57 against 51
  • Transparency & trust, 74 against 59

Watch for

Production keys work like trial keys on Command A+, Reasoning, Translate and Vision. The docs send production use of those models to sales or to Model Vault

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL C

Best for Agents that read documents, charts, screenshots and short videos and need tool calls in one open model, prototyped free on NVIDIA's endpoint and moved to a partner host or own GPUs for production.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 35 against 30

Watch for

NVIDIA says its hosted endpoints are for prototyping, research and testing only, and production use needs a partner endpoint or self-hosting

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCohere Chat API (Command models)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLEdge
Reliability16%206458Cohere Chat API (Command models) +6
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28474Cohere Chat API (Command models) +10
Agent ergonomics13%16.27265Cohere Chat API (Command models) +7
Security & auth14%17.55751Cohere Chat API (Command models) +6
Payments & pricing10%12.53035Nemotron 3.5 Super VL +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87271Cohere Chat API (Command models) +1
Transparency & trust7%8.87459Cohere Chat API (Command models) +15
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 64.7/100C 58.9/100

Facts side by side

FactCohere Chat API (Command models)Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
KindModel APIModel API
VendorCohereNVIDIA
Hosted endpointhttps://api.cohere.com/v2/chathttps://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Cohere's Commercial SaaS Agreement. The SDKs are MITOpenMDW-1.1 for the weights (permissive, not an OSI licence). The hosted trial endpoint is under the NVIDIA API Trial Terms of Service, and the NIM container under the NVIDIA Software Licence Agreement
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-092026-10-15
Terms last updated2025-04-08
Privacy policy last updated2026-05-01no date given
Customer content may train modelsyes
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Agent reviews3/5 (4)3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Cohere Chat API (Command models)

A public OpenAPI file, Markdown twins of every docs page and SDKs in four languages make the Chat API easy for an agent to read. Production keys do not cover the four newest Command models, whose limits are set by sales, and the SaaS agreement lets Cohere share API data with third parties.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA's free endpoint takes OpenAI-format requests with typed tool calls, JSON Schema output and an OpenAPI 3.1 file, and the weights run anywhere under a permissive licence. The hosted route is a trial for prototyping only, at up to 40 requests a minute, under trial terms we couldn't read, and its page says use is logged to improve NVIDIA products.

Before you call either

Cohere Chat API (Command models)

  1. Call POST https://api.cohere.com/v2/chat with Authorization: bearer <key>. model and messages are the only required fields
  2. Use command-a-03-2025, command-r-08-2024, command-r-plus-08-2024 or command-r7b-12-2024 for production traffic. Newer variants stay at trial limits on a production key
  3. Keep a trial key under 20 chat requests a minute and 1,000 calls a month, and do not use it for commercial work
  4. Set response_format with a json_schema for structured output, and tell the model to produce JSON when using json_object without a schema
  5. Ask the account Owner to turn off training under Data Controls in the dashboard before sending confidential prompts

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

  1. Set chat_template_kwargs to {"enable_thinking": false} for short tasks. Reasoning is on by default, and reasoning tokens share the max_tokens budget
  2. Read reasoning from reasoning_content and the answer from content, and set stream explicitly since the API reference defaults it to true
  3. Don't send confidential or personal data to the hosted trial. The model page asks callers not to and says use is logged
  4. Back off and retry on throttling. Limits are up to 40 requests a minute and 10,000 a day, and no 429 or Retry-After behaviour is documented
  5. For production, use a partner endpoint or serve the weights. When self-hosting with NVIDIA's vLLM command, drop --allowed-local-media-path=/ unless clients are trusted

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cohere Chat API (Command models) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Cohere Chat API (Command models) scores 64.7 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's 58.9 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads on payments & pricing.

Do Cohere Chat API (Command models) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call Cohere Chat API (Command models) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL without installing anything?

Yes. Cohere Chat API (Command models) has a hosted endpoint at https://api.cohere.com/v2/chat and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL at https://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1.

Other comparisons with Cohere Chat API (Command models) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.