Head to head · Open-weight models · October 2026 research run
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs SambaCloud
SambaCloud scores 66.4 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's 58.9 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 326 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that read documents, charts, screenshots and short videos and need tool calls in one open model, prototyped free on NVIDIA's endpoint and moved to a partner host or own GPUs for production.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
NVIDIA says its hosted endpoints are for prototyping, research and testing only, and production use needs a partner endpoint or self-hosting
Best for Agents that want open-weight models behind an OpenAI or Anthropic client with a free start and prices an agent can read from the API.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 85 against 58
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 74
- Security & auth, 58 against 51
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 77 against 71
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 3.0 out of 5
Watch for
Production models get a notice of two to three weeks, and 13 model ids were removed between 9 March and 9 June 2026
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | SambaCloud | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 58 | 85 | SambaCloud +27 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 74 | 81 | SambaCloud +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 65 | 67 | SambaCloud +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 51 | 58 | SambaCloud +7 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | SambaCloud +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 71 | 77 | SambaCloud +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 59 | 63 | SambaCloud +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | C 58.9/100 | B 66.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | SambaCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | NVIDIA | SambaNova Systems, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1 | https://api.sambanova.ai/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 for the weights (permissive, not an OSI licence). The hosted trial endpoint is under the NVIDIA API Trial Terms of Service, and the NIM container under the NVIDIA Software Licence Agreement | Proprietary service under the SambaCloud Terms of Service. The SDKs and the OpenAPI document are Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-09-17 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2023-05-27 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | none | 2 stars, 76 npm/wk, 6.1k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
NVIDIA's free endpoint takes OpenAI-format requests with typed tool calls, JSON Schema output and an OpenAPI 3.1 file, and the weights run anywhere under a permissive licence. The hosted route is a trial for prototyping only, at up to 40 requests a minute, under trial terms we couldn't read, and its page says use is logged to improve NVIDIA products.
SambaCloud
Per-token prices and the model list are readable without a key at /v1/models, and a free tier needs no card. Production models get two to three weeks' notice before removal, 13 model ids left between March and June 2026, and the docs disagree with the live catalogue on MiniMax-M2.7.
Before you call either
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Set
chat_template_kwargsto{"enable_thinking": false}for short tasks. Reasoning is on by default, and reasoning tokens share themax_tokensbudget - Read reasoning from
reasoning_contentand the answer fromcontent, and setstreamexplicitly since the API reference defaults it to true - Don't send confidential or personal data to the hosted trial. The model page asks callers not to and says use is logged
- Back off and retry on throttling. Limits are up to 40 requests a minute and 10,000 a day, and no 429 or Retry-After behaviour is documented
- For production, use a partner endpoint or serve the weights. When self-hosting with NVIDIA's vLLM command, drop
--allowed-local-media-path=/unless clients are trusted
SambaCloud
- Call
GET https://api.sambanova.ai/v1/modelsat start-up and use only ids it returns. The docs name models the endpoint no longer lists - Read
x-ratelimit-remaining-requestsandx-ratelimit-remaining-requests-dayon every response. The free tier allows 20 requests a day per model - Treat 429
queue_fulland 503maintenanceas retryable after a delay, and 410model_deprecatedas a signal to change model - Validate JSON output yourself. Schema enforcement is best effort and
strict: truechanges nothing - Check
max_completion_tokensper model. DeepSeek-V3.1 caps output at 7,168 tokens and Llama 3.3 70B at 3,072
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or SambaCloud?
SambaCloud scores 66.4 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's 58.9 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Do Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and SambaCloud need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and SambaCloud without installing anything?
Yes. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has a hosted endpoint at https://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1 and SambaCloud at https://api.sambanova.ai/v1.
Other comparisons with Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or SambaCloud
- Claude API vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Claude API vs SambaCloud
- Antseed vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Antseed vs SambaCloud
- BlockRun.AI vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- BlockRun.AI vs SambaCloud
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs SambaCloud
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs SambaCloud
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs SambaCloud
- DeepInfra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- DeepInfra vs SambaCloud
- DeepSeek API vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- DeepSeek API vs SambaCloud
- Glimpse vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Glimpse vs SambaCloud
- Gemini Developer API vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Gemini Developer API vs SambaCloud
- GroqCloud vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- GroqCloud vs SambaCloud
- Jais 3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Jais 3 vs SambaCloud
- Meta Model API vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Meta Model API vs SambaCloud
- Mistral AI API vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Mistral AI API vs SambaCloud
- Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Muse Spark Open vs SambaCloud
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs OpenAI API
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs OpenRouter
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs RouterPlus
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs StepFun API
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Novita AI vs SambaCloud
- OpenAI API vs SambaCloud
- OpenRouter vs SambaCloud
- Beam 1.0 vs SambaCloud
- RouterPlus vs SambaCloud
- SambaCloud vs SiliconFlow
- SambaCloud vs StepFun API
- SambaCloud vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Novita AI
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Prism Inference
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Beam 1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs SiliconFlow
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Underdog
- Prism Inference vs SambaCloud
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl-vs-sambanova.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-5-super-vl.json·/api/v1/tools/sambanova.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nemotron-3-5-super-vl sambanova(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nemotron-3-5-super-vl", "b": "sambanova"}at/mcp, no key