Head to head · Open-weight models · October 2026 research run

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs SambaCloud

SambaCloud scores 66.4 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's 58.9 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models.

Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 326 models comparisons

Which one, for what

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL C

Best for Agents that read documents, charts, screenshots and short videos and need tool calls in one open model, prototyped free on NVIDIA's endpoint and moved to a partner host or own GPUs for production.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

NVIDIA says its hosted endpoints are for prototyping, research and testing only, and production use needs a partner endpoint or self-hosting

SambaCloud B

Best for Agents that want open-weight models behind an OpenAI or Anthropic client with a free start and prices an agent can read from the API.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 85 against 58
  • Schema & documentation, 81 against 74
  • Security & auth, 58 against 51
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
  • Maintenance & community, 77 against 71

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 3.0 out of 5

Watch for

Production models get a notice of two to three weeks, and 13 model ids were removed between 9 March and 9 June 2026

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runNemotron 3.5 Super VLSambaCloudEdge
Reliability16%205885SambaCloud +27
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27481SambaCloud +7
Agent ergonomics13%16.26567SambaCloud +2
Security & auth14%17.55158SambaCloud +7
Payments & pricing10%12.53540SambaCloud +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87177SambaCloud +6
Transparency & trust7%8.85963SambaCloud +4
Negative events≤150-2
TotalC 58.9/100B 66.4/100

Facts side by side

FactNemotron 3.5 Super VLSambaCloud
KindModel APIModel API
VendorNVIDIASambaNova Systems, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1https://api.sambanova.ai/v1
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceOpenMDW-1.1 for the weights (permissive, not an OSI licence). The hosted trial endpoint is under the NVIDIA API Trial Terms of Service, and the NIM container under the NVIDIA Software Licence AgreementProprietary service under the SambaCloud Terms of Service. The SDKs and the OpenAPI document are Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-152026-09-17
Terms last updatedno date given
Privacy policy last updatedno date given2023-05-27
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularitynone2 stars, 76 npm/wk, 6.1k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (4)3.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA's free endpoint takes OpenAI-format requests with typed tool calls, JSON Schema output and an OpenAPI 3.1 file, and the weights run anywhere under a permissive licence. The hosted route is a trial for prototyping only, at up to 40 requests a minute, under trial terms we couldn't read, and its page says use is logged to improve NVIDIA products.

SambaCloud

Per-token prices and the model list are readable without a key at /v1/models, and a free tier needs no card. Production models get two to three weeks' notice before removal, 13 model ids left between March and June 2026, and the docs disagree with the live catalogue on MiniMax-M2.7.

Before you call either

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

  1. Set chat_template_kwargs to {"enable_thinking": false} for short tasks. Reasoning is on by default, and reasoning tokens share the max_tokens budget
  2. Read reasoning from reasoning_content and the answer from content, and set stream explicitly since the API reference defaults it to true
  3. Don't send confidential or personal data to the hosted trial. The model page asks callers not to and says use is logged
  4. Back off and retry on throttling. Limits are up to 40 requests a minute and 10,000 a day, and no 429 or Retry-After behaviour is documented
  5. For production, use a partner endpoint or serve the weights. When self-hosting with NVIDIA's vLLM command, drop --allowed-local-media-path=/ unless clients are trusted

SambaCloud

  1. Call GET https://api.sambanova.ai/v1/models at start-up and use only ids it returns. The docs name models the endpoint no longer lists
  2. Read x-ratelimit-remaining-requests and x-ratelimit-remaining-requests-day on every response. The free tier allows 20 requests a day per model
  3. Treat 429 queue_full and 503 maintenance as retryable after a delay, and 410 model_deprecated as a signal to change model
  4. Validate JSON output yourself. Schema enforcement is best effort and strict: true changes nothing
  5. Check max_completion_tokens per model. DeepSeek-V3.1 caps output at 7,168 tokens and Llama 3.3 70B at 3,072

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or SambaCloud?

SambaCloud scores 66.4 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's 58.9 (C), and leads in every scored category.

Do Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and SambaCloud need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and SambaCloud without installing anything?

Yes. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has a hosted endpoint at https://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1 and SambaCloud at https://api.sambanova.ai/v1.

Other comparisons with Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or SambaCloud

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.