Head to head · Agent memory · October 2026 research run
Graphiti vs Tokenrip
Tokenrip scores 59.6 (C) on agent readiness against Graphiti's 53.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Graphiti leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do agent memory.
Best memory layers for AI agents · All 134 memory comparisons
Which one, for what
Graphiti D
Best for Teams that want Zep's temporal graph model on their own infrastructure and can run a graph database.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 50 against 27
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 50
- Transparency & trust, 71 against 56
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
Every add runs LLM extraction, so ingestion costs tokens and time
Tokenrip C
Best for Small teams, or one person with several agents in different tools (Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Cursor, Grok), who want one place for shared files, tasks, decisions and handoffs with a person approving outside actions.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 83 against 71
- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 51
- Security & auth, 69 against 23
- Maintenance & community, 70 against 65
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
99 tool definitions with no toolsets or dynamic loading found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Graphiti | Tokenrip | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 27 | Graphiti +23 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 71 | 83 | Tokenrip +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 51 | 70 | Tokenrip +19 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 23 | 69 | Tokenrip +46 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 50 | Graphiti +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 70 | Tokenrip +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 71 | 56 | Graphiti +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 53.3/100 | C 59.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Graphiti | Tokenrip |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent framework | MCP server |
| Vendor | Zep | Quintel, LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.tokenrip.com/mcp |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio | Streamable HTTP, HTTP |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary hosted service under Tokenrip's terms of service (Quintel, LLC, Texas law). The rip CLI and library @tokenrip/cli is MIT-licensed on GitHub |
| Tools exposed | 13 | 99 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.silostack/tokenrip |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 29k stars, 151k PyPI/wk | 5 stars, 401 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Graphiti
Apache-2.0, with FalkorDB, Neo4j or Amazon Neptune as the store. Every add runs LLM extraction, so ingestion costs tokens and time.
Tokenrip
A shared workspace that agents in different tools reach over MCP, REST or a CLI, with scoped OAuth, annotated tools, a public OpenAPI file and an approval step for outside actions. It is young and run by two founders, with 99 tools to load, full-access API keys, and no status page, changelog or SLA found.
Before you call either
Graphiti
- Set OPENAI_API_KEY (or another provider's key) and MODEL_NAME before starting the MCP server
- Use search_memory_facts for facts and search_nodes for entities instead of reading whole episodes
- Never call clear_graph to fix one fact. Use delete_episode or delete_entity_edge
- Pass group_ids on every search and add so one user's graph doesn't leak into another's
- Call get_status to check the database connection before a long ingest
Tokenrip
- Call
workspace_list, thenworkspace_loadwith the full workspace id at the start of every run. - Send a one-sentence
whywith every workspace write, or it's refused withWHY_REQUIRED. - Propose posts, emails and bookings with
task_proposeand act only on the approved text. - Ask the person before following the setup guide; it installs the CLI globally and signs in with their email.
- Prefer OAuth with only the scopes you need; a pasted
tr_key can do anything on the account.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Graphiti or Tokenrip?
Tokenrip scores 59.6 (C) on agent readiness against Graphiti's 53.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Graphiti leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Can an agent call Graphiti and Tokenrip without installing anything?
Graphiti runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Tokenrip has a hosted endpoint at https://api.tokenrip.com/mcp.
Are Graphiti and Tokenrip open source?
Graphiti is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Tokenrip.
Other comparisons with Graphiti or Tokenrip
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Memory vs Graphiti
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Memory vs Tokenrip
- Cognee vs Graphiti
- Cognee vs Tokenrip
- Graphiti vs Hindsight
- Graphiti vs Honcho
- Graphiti vs Hy Memory
- Graphiti vs LangMem
- Graphiti vs LocalGhost
- Graphiti vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Graphiti vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- Graphiti vs past.dev
- Graphiti vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Graphiti vs Zep
- Hindsight vs Tokenrip
- Honcho vs Tokenrip
- Hy Memory vs Tokenrip
- LangMem vs Tokenrip
- LocalGhost vs Tokenrip
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Tokenrip
- Memory (MCP reference server) vs Tokenrip
- past.dev vs Tokenrip
- Supermemory API + MCP vs Tokenrip
- Tokenrip vs Zep
- AI Memory vs Graphiti
- AI Memory vs Tokenrip
- Context Mode Engine vs Graphiti
- Context Mode Engine vs Tokenrip
- Graphicle vs Graphiti
- Graphicle vs Tokenrip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/graphiti-vs-tokenrip.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/graphiti.json·/api/v1/tools/tokenrip.json - From a terminal
anchor compare graphiti tokenrip(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "graphiti", "b": "tokenrip"}at/mcp, no key