# Graphiti vs Tokenrip (slim)

> Tokenrip scores 59.6 (C) to Graphiti's 53.3 (D) for agent memory. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-tokenrip.md (~2,500 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-tokenrip.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-tokenrip
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Tokenrip scores 59.6 (C) on agent readiness against Graphiti's 53.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Graphiti leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do agent memory.

- Graphiti: D 53.3, rank #814 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/graphiti.min.md
- Tokenrip: C 59.6, rank #608 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tokenrip.min.md
- Graphiti, good for Teams that want Zep's temporal graph model on their own infrastructure and can run a graph database. Ahead on Reliability, 50 against 27; Payments & pricing, 60 against 50; Transparency & trust, 71 against 56. Also No key needed to call it; Runs on your own machine; Open source.
- Tokenrip, good for Small teams, or one person with several agents in different tools (Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Cursor, Grok), who want one place for shared files, tasks, decisions and handoffs with a person approving outside actions. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 83 against 71; Agent ergonomics, 70 against 51; Security & auth, 69 against 23; Maintenance & community, 70 against 65. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Free to start without a card; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 2.5 out of 5.

| Category | Graphiti | Tokenrip |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 50 | 27 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 71 | 83 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 51 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 23 | 69 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 50 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 65 | 70 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 71 | 56 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Graphiti | Tokenrip |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Agent framework | MCP server |
| Vendor | Zep | Quintel, LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.tokenrip.com/mcp` |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio | Streamable HTTP, HTTP |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary hosted service under Tokenrip's terms of service (Quintel, LLC, Texas law). The `rip` CLI and library `@tokenrip/cli` is MIT-licensed on GitHub |
| Tools exposed | 13 | 99 |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.silostack/tokenrip` |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked |  |
| Popularity | 29k stars, 151k PyPI/wk | 5 stars, 401 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.8/5 (4) |