Head to head · Agent memory · October 2026 research run
Hy Memory vs Tokenrip
Tokenrip scores 59.6 (C) on agent readiness against Hy Memory's 57.7 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Hy Memory leads on reliability, payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do agent memory.
Best memory layers for AI agents · All 134 memory comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Python teams that want self-hosted layered chat memory, or working and coding memory from tool-call traces, over stores they run.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 27
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 50
- Maintenance & community, 76 against 70
- Transparency & trust, 62 against 56
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
delete() leaves the source conversation, the deleted text in history.db and extraction prompts in cache.db, and can reactivate a superseded fact
Tokenrip C
Best for Small teams, or one person with several agents in different tools (Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Cursor, Grok), who want one place for shared files, tasks, decisions and handoffs with a person approving outside actions.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 83 against 55
- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 60
- Security & auth, 69 against 37
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
99 tool definitions with no toolsets or dynamic loading found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hy Memory | Tokenrip | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 27 | Hy Memory +38 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 55 | 83 | Tokenrip +28 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 60 | 70 | Tokenrip +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 37 | 69 | Tokenrip +32 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 50 | Hy Memory +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 76 | 70 | Hy Memory +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 62 | 56 | Hy Memory +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.7/100 | C 59.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hy Memory | Tokenrip |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | SDK + MCP | MCP server |
| Vendor | Tencent Hunyuan | Quintel, LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.tokenrip.com/mcp |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, HTTP | |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (PyPI metadata for the 1.x releases and 2.0.1 says MIT; 2.0.2 carries Apache-2.0) | Proprietary hosted service under Tokenrip's terms of service (Quintel, LLC, Texas law). The rip CLI and library @tokenrip/cli is MIT-licensed on GitHub |
| Tools exposed | none | 99 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.silostack/tokenrip |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 27 stars, 147 PyPI/wk | 5 stars, 401 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 3.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Hy Memory
An Apache-2.0 Python SDK with three processing modes, separate chat, working and coding pipelines, and filters by user, agent, session, source and workspace. Deletion does not stick everywhere. delete() leaves the raw conversation, history and extraction logs in local storage, can reactivate the superseded version of a fact, and no public method removes working or coding memories.
Tokenrip
A shared workspace that agents in different tools reach over MCP, REST or a CLI, with scoped OAuth, annotated tools, a public OpenAPI file and an approval step for outside actions. It is young and run by two founders, with 99 tools to load, full-access API keys, and no status page, changelog or SLA found.
Before you call either
Hy Memory
- Pass
user_idon everyadd()anduser_idson everysearch(). Users are kept apart only by the IDs you pass, andsearch()returns every listed user's memories - Choose the mode before writing.
litemakes no LLM calls and stores raw text.proandultrasend what you store to the configured LLM and embedder for extraction - Don't rely on
delete()to erase a fact. The raw conversation,history.dbandcache.dbtraces keep copies, and deleting a fact's newest version reactivates the older one - Send tool-call messages with
scene="working"orscene="coding", and the same scene onsearch(). Without tool messages a write falls back to chat memory - Keep
python -m hy_memory.serveron 127.0.0.1. It has no authentication and allows any web origin
Tokenrip
- Call
workspace_list, thenworkspace_loadwith the full workspace id at the start of every run. - Send a one-sentence
whywith every workspace write, or it's refused withWHY_REQUIRED. - Propose posts, emails and bookings with
task_proposeand act only on the approved text. - Ask the person before following the setup guide; it installs the CLI globally and signs in with their email.
- Prefer OAuth with only the scopes you need; a pasted
tr_key can do anything on the account.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Hy Memory or Tokenrip?
Tokenrip scores 59.6 (C) on agent readiness against Hy Memory's 57.7 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Hy Memory leads on reliability, payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Can an agent call Hy Memory and Tokenrip without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Hy Memory. Tokenrip has a hosted endpoint at https://api.tokenrip.com/mcp.
Are Hy Memory and Tokenrip open source?
Hy Memory is open source (Apache-2.0 (PyPI metadata for the 1.x releases and 2.0.1 says MIT; 2.0.2 carries Apache-2.0)). No open-source release is listed for Tokenrip.
Other comparisons with Hy Memory or Tokenrip
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Memory vs Hy Memory
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Memory vs Tokenrip
- Cognee vs Hy Memory
- Cognee vs Tokenrip
- Graphiti vs Hy Memory
- Graphiti vs Tokenrip
- Hindsight vs Hy Memory
- Hindsight vs Tokenrip
- Honcho vs Hy Memory
- Honcho vs Tokenrip
- Hy Memory vs LangMem
- Hy Memory vs LocalGhost
- Hy Memory vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Hy Memory vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- Hy Memory vs past.dev
- Hy Memory vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Hy Memory vs Zep
- LangMem vs Tokenrip
- LocalGhost vs Tokenrip
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Tokenrip
- Memory (MCP reference server) vs Tokenrip
- past.dev vs Tokenrip
- Supermemory API + MCP vs Tokenrip
- Tokenrip vs Zep
- AI Memory vs Hy Memory
- AI Memory vs Tokenrip
- Context Mode Engine vs Hy Memory
- Context Mode Engine vs Tokenrip
- Graphicle vs Hy Memory
- Graphicle vs Tokenrip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hy-memory-vs-tokenrip.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hy-memory.json·/api/v1/tools/tokenrip.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hy-memory tokenrip(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hy-memory", "b": "tokenrip"}at/mcp, no key