Graphicle vs Tokenrip

Graphicle

One local program gives a coding agent a code graph and project memory through 25 typed, annotated MCP tools that return cited excerpts within a token budget, with agent-written memories held for human approval. It is one day old at version 0.1.0, its SDKs are not on any registry, and the licence and advisory check fails on main.

Tokenrip

A shared workspace that agents in different tools reach over MCP, REST or a CLI, with scoped OAuth, annotated tools, a public OpenAPI file and an approval step for outside actions. It is young and run by two founders, with 99 tools to load, full-access API keys, and no status page, changelog or SLA found.

Graphicle

1. Call recall_project with a max_tokens budget, then read_project_source with the cited id and byte offset to continue a cut excerpt
2. Use query_graph, get_neighbors and shortest_path for structure questions, and pass repo to reach another synced project
3. Treat proposed memories as drafts. They are not served until a person approves them in graphicle open under Memory
4. Ask the user before running graphicle setup, which edits agent settings, AGENTS.md and Git hooks, and use graphicle disconnect to undo it
5. Over HTTP send the key as Authorization: Bearer, never in the URL, and on 429 wait for the Retry-After reset

Tokenrip

1. Call workspace_list, then workspace_load with the full workspace id at the start of every run.
2. Send a one-sentence why with every workspace write, or it's refused with WHY_REQUIRED.
3. Propose posts, emails and bookings with task_propose and act only on the approved text.
4. Ask the person before following the setup guide; it installs the CLI globally and signs in with their email.
5. Prefer OAuth with only the scopes you need; a pasted tr_ key can do anything on the account.