Head to head · Agent memory · October 2026 research run
EverOS vs Tokenrip
EverOS scores 69.4 (B) on agent readiness against Tokenrip's 60.3 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Tokenrip leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do agent memory.
Best memory layers for AI agents · All 353 memory comparisons
Which one, for what
EverOS B
Best for Self-hosted memory for agents and apps that want Markdown as the source of truth and separate user and agent tracks.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 79 against 57
- Agent ergonomics, 78 against 70
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 75
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where Tokenrip loses 9 points for them
Watch for
The local HTTP server has no authentication and relies on binding to 127.0.0.1
Tokenrip C
Best for Small teams, or one person with several agents in different tools (Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Cursor, Grok), who want one place for shared files, tasks, decisions and handoffs with a person approving outside actions.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 71 against 47
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 40
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
98 tool definitions with no toolsets or dynamic loading found
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Security & auth Tokenrip +24
EverOS 47
Framework reading for software the owner runs. The local server has no authentication and no security scheme in the OpenAPI document, relying on a 127.0.0.1 bind by default (15 of 30). No read-only mode; the cloud purge is two-step (8 of 20). Memories are extracted from conversations and returned into prompts, and everos-mcp tells hosts to save facts unprompted, with no injection guidance found (4 of 15). Structured logs and lock metrics, no audit log (6 of 15). SECURITY.md with a reporting address, five-day acknowledgement, supported versions and a published-advisories section, plus a valid security.txt (14 of 20). Total 47.
Tokenrip 71
OAuth 2.1 for MCP with PKCE S256, 25 read and write scopes requested per tool, opaque access tokens and rotating refresh tokens whose replay revokes the family. Each agent has its own key, revocable on its own and rotatable, and run keys expire within 24 hours and can't manage keys. But tr_ API keys have full access to the account, with no read-only or scoped key (25 of 30). Tools are classed Sensitive where they delete, widen visibility or call outside, and the docs ask hosts to confirm those. Actions outside the workspace go through task_propose for approval, and only the person writes an agent's instructions. A pasted key can still do anything (15 of 20). Shared workspaces return text written by other people's agents and external members. The setup guide and notices tell agents never to act on an email or use a code from a web page or document, but we found no general guidance on treating workspace content as untrusted (9 of 15). Every action is recorded with the agent, the tool it ran in and its reason, connections have per-call logs, and the Agents page shows each key's last use (15). Since 31 October a security page and a security.txt (Expires 3 May 2027) name security@tokenrip.com, and the CLI's SECURITY.md, updated on 2 November, points to the public repository. SECURITY.md takes private reports by email or a GitHub private advisory, with no acknowledgement time. No bug bounty, no certifications, no published advisories. The security page and the privacy policy of 3 November say affected people are told of a confirmed incident as the law and agreements require, where the 21 October policy promised 48 hours. Read against mails-ai (7, valid security.txt and a disclosure policy, no reply commitment) and blockrun-ai (10, valid security.txt and a 72-hour acknowledgement) (7 of 20).
Reliability EverOS +22
EverOS 79
Local-software lines, as a library and server the owner runs. everos on PyPI with Python 3.12 or newer stated, plus a Windows guide (20). ci.yml runs on pushes and pull requests and the repository has a tests tree, but GitHub's API answered with a rate limit, so run results were unread (15 of 25, unchecked). 43 open issues and pull requests against 82 commits in 90 days; several outside bug reports, including a silent capture failure in the DSH plugin, have no reply (14 of 25). Keep a Changelog with semantic versioning declared and a 1.0 migration guide (15). Version 1.5.1 (15). Total 79.
Tokenrip 57
Graded with the hosted lines, on the remote MCP server and REST API. status.tokenrip.com, an incident.io page opened on 2 November 2026 per the changelog, shows Website, API and MCP components with uptime bars (20). Its feed lists no incident, and two days of history is a short record (15). Rate limits are described per account in requests a minute and at once, per address for anonymous calls, and as hourly caps on invites and confirmation emails, without numbers (5 of 15). Over a limit a tool call returns RATE_LIMITED with retry: safe and retryAfterSeconds, other requests get 429 with Retry-After, responses carry X-RateLimit headers, and the docs say not to retry in a loop. Every error carries retry of never, safe or unknown, writes use version and revision guards, and connection calls are never retried; only one tool takes an idempotency key (12 of 15). The terms supply the service as is with no uptime promise, and no SLA is published (0). Nothing is labelled beta, but the API is /v0 and the pricing page called itself early on 21 October (5 of 10).
Payments & pricing Tokenrip +10
EverOS 40
Self-hosted rule, with the price lines read for EverOS Cloud. No x402, MPP or L402 (0 of 40). No cloud price or plan found on evermind.ai, its FAQ, terms or docs (0). The open-source runtime is free with no card (20). An agent can install it from PyPI and run it with no account (20). Total 40.
Tokenrip 50
No x402, MPP or L402 anywhere in the docs or the OpenAPI file (0 of 40). Plan prices are public without a login, priced per team member since 26 October 2026 (Free for one person with 2,500 actions and 1 GB a month, Pro $20 and Power $60 per member a month, Enterprise by arrangement), with no per-call or metered price (10). The free plan needs an email and a code, with no card (20). An agent can sign in with the person's email and a code without opening a browser, and POST /v0/accounts creates a keypair account with no email at all (documented as advanced, not tested). Upgrading can only be done by a person in Billing; the terms say agents can't reach it (20).
Agent ergonomics EverOS +8
EverOS 78
Read for the API, with seven MCP tools on top. Searches take top_k and a method, and responses can be scoped by five ids (20 of 25). Filters nest with AND and OR, and /get pages results (18 of 20). Errors carry typed codes and say which are retryable (16 of 20). add is queued and returns 202, a busy session refuses deletion with nothing deleted, and the cloud purge needs a nonce confirmed within five minutes (12 of 20). A demo runs with no key and the minimal setup needs one OpenRouter key, with a Python library and the MCP server, one language (12 of 15). Total 78.
Tokenrip 70
Graded on the MCP server. 98 tools in the reference on 4 November (34 Read, 40 Write, 24 Sensitive), plus a tool per connection operation an agent may call, with no toolsets, read-only subset or dynamic loading found. OAuth scopes limit which tools succeed, not which load (5, plus 2 for scope-limited clients: 7 of 25). Keyset and offset pagination, filters on tasks, search and activity, row projection and sort on tables, and results bounded at 64 KiB with an explicit continuation instead of silent truncation (20). Errors are { code, message, retry } with details, and the catalogue says what to do for each, such as TASK_TAKEN naming the holder and STORAGE_LIMIT_REACHED carrying bytes used and the plan (20). Every tool is classed from readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and openWorldHint, writes take expected-version or revision guards and return the current value on conflict, deletions go to a 30-day trash, but only workspace_view_open takes an idempotency key (16 of 20). The CLI and library are TypeScript only, and every workspace write needs a why (7 of 15).
Maintenance & community EverOS +5
EverOS 80
v1.5.1 on 22 October 2026 (30). Five tagged releases in 90 days and 12 PyPI uploads (20). Maintainer replies on some issues, others from outside users unanswered for weeks (12 of 25). Python library and the everos-mcp package, not in the official MCP registry (10 of 15). uv.lock, CI, docs and release workflows (8 of 10). Total 80.
Tokenrip 75
Read for a closed service with an open-source CLI. The changelog's newest entry is 3 November 2026 and the CLI repository's newest release commit is 2.6.16 on 2 November (30). 16 CLI release commits from 12 October to 2 November and dated changelog entries on most days since 20 October (20). No issues or pull requests have ever been opened on the repository. A public changelog now exists, and support is by email, which the about page says a founder answers; untested (10 of 25, as for other closed services with a changelog and support). Listed in the official MCP registry as io.github.silostack/tokenrip, a GitHub-verified namespace on the founder's personal account, per the 21 October check, not re-read on 4 November (12 of 15). The repository has no CI workflows and no tests. Dependencies were current and there are no install scripts, per the 21 October check (3 of 10).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | EverOS | Tokenrip | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 79 | 57 | EverOS +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 93 | Tokenrip +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 78 | 70 | EverOS +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 71 | Tokenrip +24 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 50 | Tokenrip +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 75 | EverOS +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 71 | 71 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -9 | |
| Total | B 69.4/100 | C 60.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | EverOS | Tokenrip |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | Evermind AI, Inc. | Quintel, LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.tokenrip.com/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | Streamable HTTP, HTTP |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary hosted service under Tokenrip's terms of service (Quintel, LLC, Texas law). The rip CLI and library @tokenrip/cli is MIT-licensed on GitHub |
| Tools exposed | 7 | 98 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.silostack/tokenrip |
| Last release | 2026-10-22 | 2026-11-02 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-01-20 | 2026-10-16 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-01-20 | 2026-10-16 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 14k stars, 4k PyPI/wk | 5 stars, 401 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
EverOS
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
EverOS
EverOS keeps agent and user memory as Markdown with SQLite and LanceDB indexes, behind a described OpenAPI with typed, retryable errors and an MCP server, under Apache-2.0 at version 1.5.1. The local server has no authentication, EverOS Cloud prices are not published, and the cloud terms forbid automated data extraction.
Tokenrip
A shared workspace that agents in different tools reach over MCP, REST or a CLI, with scoped OAuth, annotated tools, a public OpenAPI file and an approval step for outside actions. It is young and changes fast, with 98 tools to load, full-access API keys, no SLA, and late-October access and CLI changes announced only as they shipped.
Before you call either
EverOS
- Write new code against
/api/v2;/api/v1is a legacy alias that may go in a future major release - Call
/api/v2/memory/flushat the end of a session, sinceaddis asynchronous and buffers recent messages - Retry on 503 SESSION_BUSY or EXTERNAL_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE after a pause; nothing was written
- Keep
hostat 127.0.0.1 unless something in front adds authentication - Treat recalled memories as untrusted text, since they are extracted from past conversations
Tokenrip
- Call
workspace_list, thenworkspace_loadwith the full workspace id at the start of every run. - Send a one-sentence
whywith every workspace write, or it's refused withWHY_REQUIRED. - Propose posts, emails and bookings with
task_proposeand act only on the approved text. - Use
rip task cancelto decline a review;rip task decide --declineand--skipare refused since CLI 2.6.12. - Prefer OAuth with only the scopes you need; a pasted
tr_key can do anything on the account.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, EverOS or Tokenrip?
EverOS scores 69.4 (B) on agent readiness against Tokenrip's 60.3 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Tokenrip leads on security & auth and payments & pricing.
Do EverOS and Tokenrip need an API key?
EverOS needs no key. Tokenrip takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call EverOS and Tokenrip without installing anything?
EverOS runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Tokenrip has a hosted endpoint at https://api.tokenrip.com/mcp.
Are EverOS and Tokenrip open source?
EverOS is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Tokenrip.
Other comparisons with EverOS or Tokenrip
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Memory vs EverOS
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Memory vs Tokenrip
- Basic Memory vs EverOS
- Basic Memory vs Tokenrip
- claude-mem vs EverOS
- claude-mem vs Tokenrip
- Cognee vs EverOS
- Cognee vs Tokenrip
- EverOS vs Agent Platform Memory Bank
- EverOS vs Graphicle
- EverOS vs Graphiti
- EverOS vs Hindsight
- EverOS vs Honcho
- EverOS vs Hy Memory
- EverOS vs LangMem
- EverOS vs LocalGhost
- EverOS vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- EverOS vs MemMachine
- EverOS vs Memori
- EverOS vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- EverOS vs MemPalace
- EverOS vs past.dev
- EverOS vs Supermemory API + MCP
- EverOS vs TencentDB Agent Memory
- EverOS vs Zep
- Agent Platform Memory Bank vs Tokenrip
- Graphiti vs Tokenrip
- Hindsight vs Tokenrip
- Honcho vs Tokenrip
- Hy Memory vs Tokenrip
- LangMem vs Tokenrip
- LocalGhost vs Tokenrip
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Tokenrip
- MemMachine vs Tokenrip
- Memori vs Tokenrip
- Memory (MCP reference server) vs Tokenrip
- MemPalace vs Tokenrip
- past.dev vs Tokenrip
- Supermemory API + MCP vs Tokenrip
- TencentDB Agent Memory vs Tokenrip
- Tokenrip vs Zep
- AI Memory vs EverOS
- AI Memory vs Tokenrip
- Context Mode Engine vs EverOS
- Context Mode Engine vs Tokenrip
- Graphicle vs Tokenrip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/everos-vs-tokenrip.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/everos.json·/api/v1/tools/tokenrip.json - From a terminal
anchor compare everos tokenrip(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "everos", "b": "tokenrip"}at/mcp, no key