Head to head · Memory search · October 2026 research run
Graphicle vs Khoj
Graphicle scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against Khoj's 38.5 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do memory search.
Best memory layers for AI agents · All 65 memory comparisons
Best local AI models and assistants · All 204 local ai comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A developer who wants one local tool that gives Claude Code, Codex or Cursor both code structure and project memory with citations.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 83 against 34
- Agent ergonomics, 86 against 46
- Security & auth, 69 against 29
- Maintenance & community, 48 against 19
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 60
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 1.0 out of 5
- No incidents deducted, where Khoj loses 7 points for them
Watch for
One release, v0.1.0 on 14 October 2026, from a repository created that day
Khoj E
Best for One person who wants a self-hosted assistant over their own notes and documents, reached from Obsidian or Emacs, with a local or hosted model, and who will read the source to script it.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No tagged release since 2.0.0-beta.28 on 26 March 2026 and no commit since 2 August
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Graphicle | Khoj | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 63 | 65 | Khoj +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 83 | 34 | Graphicle +49 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 86 | 46 | Graphicle +40 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 69 | 29 | Graphicle +40 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 48 | 19 | Graphicle +29 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 68 | 60 | Graphicle +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -7 | |
| Total | B 69.8/100 | E 38.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Graphicle | Khoj |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | Platform |
| Vendor | KarLex AI, Inc. | Khoj Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
| Tools exposed | 25 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-03-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-03-14 | 2024-06-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-03-14 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 144 stars | 38k stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (4) | 1/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Graphicle
One local program gives a coding agent a code graph and project memory through 25 typed, annotated MCP tools that return cited excerpts within a token budget, with agent-written memories held for human approval. It is one day old at version 0.1.0, its SDKs are not on any registry, and the licence and advisory check fails on main.
Khoj
AGPL-3.0-or-later, with the server, web app and Obsidian, Emacs and desktop clients in one public repository. No tagged release since 2.0.0-beta.28 on 26 March 2026 and no commit since 2 August.
Before you call either
Graphicle
- Call
recall_projectwith amax_tokensbudget, thenread_project_sourcewith the cited id and byte offset to continue a cut excerpt - Use
query_graph,get_neighborsandshortest_pathfor structure questions, and passrepoto reach another synced project - Treat proposed memories as drafts. They are not served until a person approves them in
graphicle openunder Memory - Ask the user before running
graphicle setup, which edits agent settings, AGENTS.md and Git hooks, and usegraphicle disconnectto undo it - Over HTTP send the key as
Authorization: Bearer, never in the URL, and on 429 wait for the Retry-After reset
Khoj
- Install with
pip install --pre khojor a 2.0.0-beta image tag. Plainpip install khojandlatestgive 1.42.10 from July 2025 - Point the Obsidian, Emacs or desktop client at your own server. They default to app.khoj.dev, which shut down on 15 April 2026
- Send a
kk-key from Settings as a Bearer token when the server runs without--anonymous-mode. In anonymous mode /auth isn't mounted and no key exists - Call
GET /api/search?q=...&n=5for passages and putfile:"notes.md"ordt>="2026-01-01"insideqto filter. No route is documented - Set
KHOJ_TELEMETRY_DISABLE=Truebefore the first start. Tagged releases send the caller's IP with telemetry
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Graphicle or Khoj?
Graphicle scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against Khoj's 38.5 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Can an agent call Graphicle and Khoj without installing anything?
Graphicle runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Khoj.
Are Graphicle and Khoj open source?
Yes. Graphicle is open source (Apache-2.0). Khoj is open source (AGPL-3.0-or-later).
Other comparisons with Graphicle or Khoj
- AnythingLLM vs Khoj
- BitRun vs Khoj
- Docker Model Runner vs Khoj
- Foundry Local vs Khoj
- Core vs Khoj
- GPT4All vs Khoj
- Jan vs Khoj
- Khoj vs KoboldCpp
- Khoj vs Lemonade
- Khoj vs llama.cpp
- Khoj vs LM Studio
- Khoj vs LocalAI
- Khoj vs MLX LM
- Khoj vs Ollama
- Khoj vs Open WebUI
- Khoj vs TextGen
- Khoj vs vLLM
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Memory vs Graphicle
- Cognee vs Graphicle
- Graphicle vs Graphiti
- Graphicle vs Hindsight
- Graphicle vs Honcho
- Graphicle vs LangMem
- Graphicle vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Graphicle vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Graphicle vs Zep
- Khoj vs LocalGhost
- Khoj vs screenpipe
Disclosure
Khoj competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds, and LocalGhost's own about page names it as a competitor. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/graphicle-vs-khoj.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/graphicle.json·/api/v1/tools/khoj.json - From a terminal
anchor compare graphicle khoj(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "graphicle", "b": "khoj"}at/mcp, no key