Head to head · Memory store · October 2026 research run
Cognee vs Graphiti
Cognee has a score of 54.6 (C) against Graphiti's 53.3 (D). Both do memory store. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 25 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cognee for
- schema & documentation (+14)
- agent ergonomics (+8)
- security & auth (+16)
- maintenance & community (+17)
Pick Graphiti for
- payments & pricing (+25)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cognee | Graphiti | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 50 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 71 | Cognee +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 59 | 51 | Cognee +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 39 | 23 | Cognee +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 60 | Graphiti +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 65 | Cognee +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 71 | Graphiti +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 54.6 · C | 53.3 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cognee | Graphiti |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | Agent framework |
| Vendor | Cognee | Zep |
| Hosted endpoint | https://<tenant>.aws.cognee.ai/api/v1 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio, SSE (legacy) | Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 7 | 13 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-09-08 |
| Popularity | 31k stars, 21k PyPI/wk | 29k stars, 151k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cognee
Apache-2.0 library, REST server and MCP server, all self-hostable, with local models and no LLM key since 1.6.0. No status page, rate limits, SLA or SOC 2 for Cloud, and Cloud runs in AWS us-east-1 with no EU region.
Graphiti
Apache-2.0, with FalkorDB, Neo4j or Amazon Neptune as the store. Every add runs LLM extraction, so ingestion costs tokens and time.
Before you call either
Cognee
- Use remember, recall and forget. The older cognify, search and delete MCP tools are gone
- Always include /api/v1 in REST paths
- Check cognify_status before querying data you added with background=true
- Never pass everything=true to forget unless you mean to wipe all of the user's memory
- Set a client timeout on Cloud calls and treat HTTP 402 as an empty balance, since an empty balance has also shown up as hangs
Graphiti
- Set OPENAI_API_KEY (or another provider's key) and MODEL_NAME before starting the MCP server
- Use search_memory_facts for facts and search_nodes for entities instead of reading whole episodes
- Never call clear_graph to fix one fact. Use delete_episode or delete_entity_edge
- Pass group_ids on every search and add so one user's graph doesn't leak into another's
- Call get_status to check the database connection before a long ingest
Other comparisons with Cognee or Graphiti
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/cognee.json·/api/v1/tools/graphiti.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/cognee-vs-graphiti.md