Head to head · Memory store · October 2026 research run
Cognee vs Supermemory API + MCP
Supermemory API + MCP has a score of 63.6 (B) against Cognee's 54.6 (C). Both do memory store. The largest gap is transparency & trust, 18 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cognee for
- payments & pricing (+5)
- transparency & trust (+18)
Pick Supermemory API + MCP for
- reliability (+15)
- agent ergonomics (+14)
- security & auth (+15)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cognee | Supermemory API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 65 | Supermemory API + MCP +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 59 | 73 | Supermemory API + MCP +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 39 | 54 | Supermemory API + MCP +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 30 | Cognee +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 85 | Supermemory API + MCP +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 49 | Cognee +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 54.6 · C | 63.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cognee | Supermemory API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Cognee | Supermemory |
| Hosted endpoint | https://<tenant>.aws.cognee.ai/api/v1 | https://api.supermemory.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 7 | 8 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-09-21 |
| Popularity | 31k stars, 21k PyPI/wk | 31k stars, 121k npm/wk, 45k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cognee
Apache-2.0 library, REST server and MCP server, all self-hostable, with local models and no LLM key since 1.6.0. No status page, rate limits, SLA or SOC 2 for Cloud, and Cloud runs in AWS us-east-1 with no EU region.
Supermemory API + MCP
8-tool hosted MCP with OAuth and per-space read or write permission. No legal entity named in the terms or privacy policy.
Before you call either
Cognee
- Use remember, recall and forget. The older cognify, search and delete MCP tools are gone
- Always include /api/v1 in REST paths
- Check cognify_status before querying data you added with background=true
- Never pass everything=true to forget unless you mean to wipe all of the user's memory
- Set a client timeout on Cloud calls and treat HTTP 402 as an empty balance, since an empty balance has also shown up as hangs
Supermemory API + MCP
- Use one stable
containerTagper user and acustomIdper session - Poll the document until
statusisdonebefore searching for what you just added - Treat a 402 on search or profile as out of credit, not as a bug
- Run the prompt-based mass forget with
dryRunfirst - Call who_am_i on the MCP to see which spaces you can write to before adding
Other comparisons with Cognee or Supermemory API + MCP
- Cognee vs Graphiti
- Cognee vs Hindsight
- Cognee vs Honcho
- Cognee vs LocalGhost
- Cognee vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Cognee vs Zep
- Graphiti vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Hindsight vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Honcho vs Supermemory API + MCP
- LocalGhost vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Supermemory API + MCP vs Zep
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/cognee.json·/api/v1/tools/supermemory.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/cognee-vs-supermemory.md