Head to head · Memory store · October 2026 research run
Hindsight vs Supermemory API + MCP
Supermemory API + MCP has a score of 63.6 (B) against Hindsight's 50.4 (D). Both do memory store. The largest gap is reliability, 40 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Hindsight for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick Supermemory API + MCP for
- reliability (+40)
- schema & documentation (+17)
- agent ergonomics (+16)
- maintenance & community (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hindsight | Supermemory API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 25 | 65 | Supermemory API + MCP +40 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 68 | 85 | Supermemory API + MCP +17 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 57 | 73 | Supermemory API + MCP +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 58 | 54 | Hindsight +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 85 | Supermemory API + MCP +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 48 | 49 | Supermemory API + MCP +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 50.4 · D | 63.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hindsight | Supermemory API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Vectorize | Supermemory |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.hindsight.vectorize.io | https://api.supermemory.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 27 | 8 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-09-21 |
| Popularity | 43k stars, 44k npm/wk, 227k PyPI/wk | 31k stars, 121k npm/wk, 45k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Hindsight
API keys support bank-level restrictions, expiry and child-key revocation. Retain ingestion costs $10 per million tokens.
Supermemory API + MCP
8-tool hosted MCP with OAuth and per-space read or write permission. No legal entity named in the terms or privacy policy.
Before you call either
Hindsight
- Scope the MCP URL to one bank (/mcp/{bank}/) so every call lands in the right memory and three bank-admin tools drop out
- Use recall for lookups and keep reflect ($0.05 a call) for questions that need reasoning
- Pass
async: trueon large retains so the call returns before extraction finishes - Treat HTTP 402 as out of credit and 403 as a key that can't reach that bank
Supermemory API + MCP
- Use one stable
containerTagper user and acustomIdper session - Poll the document until
statusisdonebefore searching for what you just added - Treat a 402 on search or profile as out of credit, not as a bug
- Run the prompt-based mass forget with
dryRunfirst - Call who_am_i on the MCP to see which spaces you can write to before adding
Other comparisons with Hindsight or Supermemory API + MCP
- Cognee vs Hindsight
- Cognee vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Graphiti vs Hindsight
- Graphiti vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Hindsight vs Honcho
- Hindsight vs LocalGhost
- Hindsight vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Hindsight vs Zep
- Honcho vs Supermemory API + MCP
- LocalGhost vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Supermemory API + MCP vs Zep
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/hindsight.json·/api/v1/tools/supermemory.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/hindsight-vs-supermemory.md