Head to head · Memory store · October 2026 research run
Honcho vs Supermemory API + MCP
Honcho has a score of 64.2 (B) against Supermemory API + MCP's 63.6 (B). Both do memory store. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 50 points. Honcho accepts x402. Supermemory API + MCP doesn't.
Which one, for what
Pick Honcho for
- payments & pricing (+50)
- transparency & trust (+20)
Pick Supermemory API + MCP for
- reliability (+15)
- schema & documentation (+6)
- agent ergonomics (+8)
- security & auth (+6)
- maintenance & community (+12)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Honcho | Supermemory API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 65 | Supermemory API + MCP +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 79 | 85 | Supermemory API + MCP +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 65 | 73 | Supermemory API + MCP +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 48 | 54 | Supermemory API + MCP +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 80 | 30 | Honcho +50 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 73 | 85 | Supermemory API + MCP +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 69 | 49 | Honcho +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 64.2 · B | 63.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Honcho | Supermemory API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Plastic Labs | Supermemory |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.honcho.dev/v3 | https://api.supermemory.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | yes, from $0.001/call | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 8 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.plastic-labs/honcho | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-21 |
| Popularity | 7.4k stars, 18k npm/wk | 31k stars, 121k npm/wk, 45k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Honcho
Pay per call over x402 or MPP at agentcash.honcho.dev, with free read endpoints. No published rate limits, 429 guidance or SLA.
Supermemory API + MCP
8-tool hosted MCP with OAuth and per-space read or write permission. No legal entity named in the terms or privacy policy.
Before you call either
Honcho
- Get or create the workspace with POST /v3/workspaces before writing sessions and messages
- Batch up to 100 messages per request, each under 25,000 characters
- Use context retrieval for routine turns and save
chatat high or max for questions that need it, since max costs 500 times minimal - Mint a peer- or session-scoped key with an expiry for any agent that shouldn't see the whole workspace
- Over x402, batch messages rather than sending them singly, as each paid call has a $0.001 floor
Supermemory API + MCP
- Use one stable
containerTagper user and acustomIdper session - Poll the document until
statusisdonebefore searching for what you just added - Treat a 402 on search or profile as out of credit, not as a bug
- Run the prompt-based mass forget with
dryRunfirst - Call who_am_i on the MCP to see which spaces you can write to before adding
Other comparisons with Honcho or Supermemory API + MCP
- Cognee vs Honcho
- Cognee vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Graphiti vs Honcho
- Graphiti vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Hindsight vs Honcho
- Hindsight vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Honcho vs LocalGhost
- Honcho vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Honcho vs Zep
- LocalGhost vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Supermemory API + MCP vs Zep
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/honcho.json·/api/v1/tools/supermemory.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/honcho-vs-supermemory.md