Head to head · Memory store · October 2026 research run
Graphiti vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
Mem0 Platform + MCP has a score of 56.6 (C) against Graphiti's 53.3 (D). Both do memory store. The largest gap is security & auth, 22 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Graphiti for
- reliability (+20)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- transparency & trust (+5)
Pick Mem0 Platform + MCP for
- schema & documentation (+9)
- agent ergonomics (+12)
- security & auth (+22)
- maintenance & community (+20)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Graphiti | Mem0 Platform + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 30 | Graphiti +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 71 | 80 | Mem0 Platform + MCP +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 51 | 63 | Mem0 Platform + MCP +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 23 | 45 | Mem0 Platform + MCP +22 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 50 | Graphiti +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 85 | Mem0 Platform + MCP +20 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 71 | 66 | Graphiti +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 53.3 · D | 56.6 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Graphiti | Mem0 Platform + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent framework | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Zep | Mem0 |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.mem0.ai |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 13 | 11 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.mem0ai/mem0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-25 |
| Popularity | 29k stars, 151k PyPI/wk | 66k stars, 168k npm/wk, 502k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Graphiti
Apache-2.0, with FalkorDB, Neo4j or Amazon Neptune as the store. Every add runs LLM extraction, so ingestion costs tokens and time.
Mem0 Platform + MCP
An agent can create its own Free account with mem0 init --agent, no email and no card. Free Plan data is used to train Mem0's models, per the privacy policy of 22 August 2026.
Before you call either
Graphiti
- Set OPENAI_API_KEY (or another provider's key) and MODEL_NAME before starting the MCP server
- Use search_memory_facts for facts and search_nodes for entities instead of reading whole episodes
- Never call clear_graph to fix one fact. Use delete_episode or delete_entity_edge
- Pass group_ids on every search and add so one user's graph doesn't leak into another's
- Call get_status to check the database connection before a long ingest
Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Send the REST key as
Authorization: Token <key>, and the MCP key as Bearer - Don't search for a memory straight after adding it. Adds are queued, so poll get_event_status with the returned event ID
- Scope every add and search with
user_id(or agent and run IDs) so memories don't mix between users - Pass a filter on every bulk delete, since delete_all_memories wipes whatever the scope matches
- On Hobby and Starter, count retrievals rather than adds. The retrieval quota is a tenth the size
Other comparisons with Graphiti or Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Cognee vs Graphiti
- Cognee vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Graphiti vs Hindsight
- Graphiti vs Honcho
- Graphiti vs LocalGhost
- Graphiti vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Graphiti vs Zep
- Hindsight vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Honcho vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- LocalGhost vs Mem0 Platform + MCP
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Zep
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/graphiti.json·/api/v1/tools/mem0.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/graphiti-vs-mem0.md