# Graphiti vs Mem0 Platform + MCP > Mem0 Platform + MCP has a score of 56.6 (C) against Graphiti's 53.3 (D). Both do memory store. The largest gap is security & auth, 22 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-mem0 - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-mem0.md (~1,450 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-mem0.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-mem0.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Mem0 Platform + MCP has a score of 56.6 (C) against Graphiti's 53.3 (D). Both do memory store. The largest gap is security & auth, 22 points. - Graphiti: grade D, 53.3/100, rank #333 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/graphiti.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/graphiti.json - Mem0 Platform + MCP: grade C, 56.6/100, rank #301 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mem0.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mem0.json ## Which one, for what Pick Graphiti for reliability (+20), payments & pricing (+10), transparency & trust (+5). Pick Mem0 Platform + MCP for schema & documentation (+9), agent ergonomics (+12), security & auth (+22), maintenance & community (+20). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Graphiti | Mem0 Platform + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 50 | 30 | Graphiti +20 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 71 | 80 | Mem0 Platform + MCP +9 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 51 | 63 | Mem0 Platform + MCP +12 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 23 | 45 | Mem0 Platform + MCP +22 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 50 | Graphiti +10 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 65 | 85 | Mem0 Platform + MCP +20 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 71 | 66 | Graphiti +5 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **53.3 · D** | **56.6 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Graphiti | Mem0 Platform + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | Agent framework | HTTP API | | Vendor | Zep | Mem0 | | Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.mem0.ai` | | Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | None | API key | | Pricing | Free | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 | | Tools exposed | 13 | 11 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.mem0ai/mem0` | | Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-25 | | Popularity | 29k stars, 151k PyPI/wk | 66k stars, 168k npm/wk, 502k PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Graphiti.** Apache-2.0, with FalkorDB, Neo4j or Amazon Neptune as the store. Every add runs LLM extraction, so ingestion costs tokens and time. **Mem0 Platform + MCP.** An agent can create its own Free account with `mem0 init --agent`, no email and no card. Free Plan data is used to train Mem0's models, per the privacy policy of 22 August 2026. ## Before you call either ### Graphiti 1. Set OPENAI_API_KEY (or another provider's key) and MODEL_NAME before starting the MCP server 2. Use search_memory_facts for facts and search_nodes for entities instead of reading whole episodes 3. Never call clear_graph to fix one fact. Use delete_episode or delete_entity_edge 4. Pass group_ids on every search and add so one user's graph doesn't leak into another's 5. Call get_status to check the database connection before a long ingest ### Mem0 Platform + MCP 1. Send the REST key as `Authorization: Token `, and the MCP key as Bearer 2. Don't search for a memory straight after adding it. Adds are queued, so poll get_event_status with the returned event ID 3. Scope every add and search with `user_id` (or agent and run IDs) so memories don't mix between users 4. Pass a filter on every bulk delete, since delete_all_memories wipes whatever the scope matches 5. On Hobby and Starter, count retrievals rather than adds. The retrieval quota is a tenth the size ## Other comparisons with Graphiti or Mem0 Platform + MCP - [Cognee vs Graphiti](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cognee-vs-graphiti.md) - [Cognee vs Mem0 Platform + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cognee-vs-mem0.md) - [Graphiti vs Hindsight](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-hindsight.md) - [Graphiti vs Honcho](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-honcho.md) - [Graphiti vs LocalGhost](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-localghost.md) - [Graphiti vs Supermemory API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-supermemory.md) - [Graphiti vs Zep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-zep.md) - [Hindsight vs Mem0 Platform + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hindsight-vs-mem0.md) - [Honcho vs Mem0 Platform + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/honcho-vs-mem0.md) - [LocalGhost vs Mem0 Platform + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/localghost-vs-mem0.md) - [Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Supermemory API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mem0-vs-supermemory.md) - [Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Zep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mem0-vs-zep.md)