Head to head · Kyc identity · October 2026 research run
Didit vs Socure RiskOS
Didit scores 75 (BB) on agent readiness against Socure RiskOS's 63.5 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Socure RiskOS leads on transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity.
Which one, for what
Didit BB
Good for A team that wants document, liveness, screening and business registry checks from one API with public prices and no sales step, and an agent that has to set itself up.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 80 against 75
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 46
- Security & auth, 76 against 60
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 75
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Three incidents marked major on status.didit.me from 22 July to 4 September 2026, each a partial outage of the core APIs traced to the primary database
Good for A company in the United States that wants one decision from combined KYC, document, fraud and watchlist checks through a single evaluation call.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 63
Watch for
No service agreement or API terms are published. The only terms pages are website terms of use and end-user terms for document capture
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Didit | Socure RiskOS | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 75 | Didit +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 84 | Didit +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 46 | Didit +23 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 76 | 60 | Didit +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 35 | Didit +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 75 | Didit +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 68 | Socure RiskOS +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 75 · BB | 63.5 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Didit | Socure RiskOS |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Didit Identity Spain, S.L. | Socure Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://verification.didit.me | https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Didit's Business Terms and Conditions. The MCP server in didit-protocol/mcp is MIT | Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the OpenAPI file states its licence as Proprietary |
| Tools exposed | 156 | 9 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | me.didit/mcp | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-23 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-07 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 0 stars, 27k npm/wk | 35k npm/wk |
Verdicts
Didit
A self-serve verification API with public per-check prices, key registration by API, scoped keys and a 365-day audit log. The status page shows three incidents marked major between 22 July and 4 September 2026, each a partial outage of the core APIs, and the sub-processor list isn't public.
Socure RiskOS
A public OpenAPI file, llms.txt, 15 documented error codes and dated release notes cover a ten-operation REST API, and Socure Launch publishes prices from $0.80 an evaluation with a free sandbox. API keys carry no scopes, no idempotency header is defined, no service terms are published, and production stays at zero requests until Socure activates it.
Before you call either
Didit
- Register with
POST https://apx.didit.me/auth/v2/programmatic/register/, thenverify-emailwith the emailed 6-character code. Use a real inbox, because reserved test domains return 500. - Send the key as
x-api-keytohttps://verification.didit.me/v3/. The JWT from registration works only onapx.didit.me. - Create a workflow before
POST /v3/session/.workflow_idis the only required field, and an unfinished session with the samevendor_datais returned again. - Read results from webhooks and use
GET /v3/session/{sessionId}/decision/for back-fill. Every per-feature result is a plural array. - The MCP server at
https://mcp.didit.me/mcptakes OAuth sign-in only, never an API key. Approvedidit:verificationalone when the task doesn't change workflows or keys.
Socure RiskOS
- Send
Authorization: Bearer <key>tohttps://riskos.sandbox.socure.com/api/evaluationfor tests andhttps://riskos.socure.com/api/evaluationfor live checks. The two environments use separate keys. - Use dummy data only in the sandbox. It returns predefined results, connects to no live data source and expects the documented test values.
- Store the
eval_idfrom everyPOST /api/evaluationresponse. No list or search endpoint exists to find it later. - On 429 wait the seconds given in
X-Retry-After. Do not blindly resend a failedPOST /api/evaluation, because no idempotency header is documented and Launch bills each initiated evaluation. - The MCP server at
https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandboxreads docs, workflows and webhooks with its own MCP Server Key. It cannot run evaluations or read results.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Didit or Socure RiskOS?
Didit scores 75 (BB) on agent readiness against Socure RiskOS's 63.5 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Socure RiskOS leads on transparency & trust.
Do Didit and Socure RiskOS need an API key?
Didit takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Socure RiskOS needs an API key.
Can an agent call Didit and Socure RiskOS without installing anything?
Yes. Didit has a hosted endpoint at https://verification.didit.me and Socure RiskOS at https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox.
Other comparisons with Didit or Socure RiskOS
- ComplyCube vs Didit
- ComplyCube vs Socure RiskOS
- Didit vs Jumio
- Didit vs Middesk
- Didit vs Persona
- Didit vs Shufti
- Didit vs Sumsub
- Didit vs Trulioo
- Didit vs Veriff
- Jumio vs Socure RiskOS
- Persona vs Socure RiskOS
- Shufti vs Socure RiskOS
- Socure RiskOS vs Sumsub
- Socure RiskOS vs Trulioo
- Socure RiskOS vs Veriff
- ComplyAdvantage vs Didit
- ComplyAdvantage vs Socure RiskOS
- Middesk vs Socure RiskOS
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/didit-vs-socure-riskos.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/didit.json·/api/v1/tools/socure-riskos.json - From a terminal
anchor compare didit socure-riskos(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "didit", "b": "socure-riskos"}at/mcp, no key