Head to head · Kyc business · October 2026 research run
Middesk vs Socure RiskOS
Socure RiskOS scores 63.5 (B) on agent readiness against Middesk's 59 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Middesk leads on agent ergonomics. Both do kyc business.
Which one, for what
Middesk C
Good for An agent onboarding or re-checking US businesses for a bank, lender or marketplace that already holds a Middesk contract, with registry, TIN, sanctions and lien data in one object.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 56 against 46
Watch for
No public price. Fees are set in an order form, and every docs page ends with a prompt to contact sales
Good for A company in the United States that wants one decision from combined KYC, document, fraud and watchlist checks through a single evaluation call.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 10
- Maintenance & community, 75 against 64
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 61
Watch for
No service agreement or API terms are published. The only terms pages are website terms of use and end-user terms for document capture
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Middesk | Socure RiskOS | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 73 | 75 | Socure RiskOS +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 82 | 84 | Socure RiskOS +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 56 | 46 | Middesk +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 60 | Socure RiskOS +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 35 | Socure RiskOS +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 64 | 75 | Socure RiskOS +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 68 | Socure RiskOS +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 59 · C | 63.5 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Middesk | Socure RiskOS |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Middesk, Inc. | Socure Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.middesk.com/v1 | https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Middesk's Business Verification Terms and Conditions. The Claude Code and Codex plugins on GitHub are MIT | Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the OpenAPI file states its licence as Proprietary |
| Tools exposed | 11 | 9 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 2 stars | 35k npm/wk |
Verdicts
Middesk
A public OpenAPI 3.1 contract for 87 operations, llms.txt, Markdown docs and a dated weekly changelog make the REST API readable to an agent, and OAuth has a read-only scope. Access is sales-led. No price, self-serve signup or official SDK was found, and the hosted MCP server rejects sandbox keys.
Socure RiskOS
A public OpenAPI file, llms.txt, 15 documented error codes and dated release notes cover a ten-operation REST API, and Socure Launch publishes prices from $0.80 an evaluation with a free sandbox. API keys carry no scopes, no idempotency header is defined, no service terms are published, and production stays at zero requests until Socure activates it.
Before you call either
Middesk
- Match the key to the host.
mk_testkeys work only at https://api-sandbox.middesk.com/v1 andmk_livekeys only at https://api.middesk.com/v1 - Name the
ordersonPOST /v1/businesses. Omitting them places a verification order plus every package the account runs automatically, all billed - Send
address_line1andaddress_line2. The API ignoresaddress_line_1without an error - A 201 means the business was created, not verified. Wait for the
business.updatedwebhook or poll untilstatusleavespending - Stay under 20 requests a second per account, and in sandbox wait the seconds in
Retry-Afterafter a 429 on business creation
Socure RiskOS
- Send
Authorization: Bearer <key>tohttps://riskos.sandbox.socure.com/api/evaluationfor tests andhttps://riskos.socure.com/api/evaluationfor live checks. The two environments use separate keys. - Use dummy data only in the sandbox. It returns predefined results, connects to no live data source and expects the documented test values.
- Store the
eval_idfrom everyPOST /api/evaluationresponse. No list or search endpoint exists to find it later. - On 429 wait the seconds given in
X-Retry-After. Do not blindly resend a failedPOST /api/evaluation, because no idempotency header is documented and Launch bills each initiated evaluation. - The MCP server at
https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandboxreads docs, workflows and webhooks with its own MCP Server Key. It cannot run evaluations or read results.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Middesk or Socure RiskOS?
Socure RiskOS scores 63.5 (B) on agent readiness against Middesk's 59 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Middesk leads on agent ergonomics.
Do Middesk and Socure RiskOS need an API key?
Middesk takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Socure RiskOS needs an API key.
Can an agent call Middesk and Socure RiskOS without installing anything?
Yes. Middesk has a hosted endpoint at https://api.middesk.com/v1 and Socure RiskOS at https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox.
Other comparisons with Middesk or Socure RiskOS
- ComplyCube vs Middesk
- ComplyCube vs Socure RiskOS
- Didit vs Middesk
- Didit vs Socure RiskOS
- Jumio vs Middesk
- Jumio vs Socure RiskOS
- Middesk vs Veriff
- Persona vs Socure RiskOS
- Shufti vs Socure RiskOS
- Socure RiskOS vs Sumsub
- Socure RiskOS vs Trulioo
- Socure RiskOS vs Veriff
- ComplyAdvantage vs Middesk
- ComplyAdvantage vs Socure RiskOS
- Middesk vs Persona
- Middesk vs Shufti
- Middesk vs Sumsub
- Middesk vs Trulioo
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/middesk-vs-socure-riskos.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/middesk.json·/api/v1/tools/socure-riskos.json - From a terminal
anchor compare middesk socure-riskos(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "middesk", "b": "socure-riskos"}at/mcp, no key