Head to head · Kyc identity · October 2026 research run

ComplyCube vs Socure RiskOS

ComplyCube and Socure RiskOS score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63.7 (B) and 63.5 (B). Socure RiskOS leads on schema & documentation, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity.

Which one, for what

ComplyCube B

Good for An agent that creates clients, uploads documents, starts document, identity and AML screening checks and reads results for a regulated business, with low entry cost ($99 a month) and a scripted sandbox.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 84 against 75
  • Agent ergonomics, 60 against 46

Watch for

One API key per environment with no scopes. The docs say keys carry many privileges

Socure RiskOS B

Good for A company in the United States that wants one decision from combined KYC, document, fraud and watchlist checks through a single evaluation call.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 78
  • Security & auth, 60 against 52
  • Payments & pricing, 35 against 27
  • Transparency & trust, 68 against 63

Watch for

No service agreement or API terms are published. The only terms pages are website terms of use and end-user terms for document capture

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runComplyCubeSocure RiskOSEdge
Reliability16%208475ComplyCube +9
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27884Socure RiskOS +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.26046ComplyCube +14
Security & auth14%17.55260Socure RiskOS +8
Payments & pricing10%12.52735Socure RiskOS +8
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87475Socure RiskOS +1
Transparency & trust7%8.86368Socure RiskOS +5
Negative events≤1500
Total63.7 · B63.5 · B

Facts side by side

FactComplyCubeSocure RiskOS
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorComplyCube (Teemo Technology Ltd)Socure Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://api.complycube.comhttps://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPay per usePay per use
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under ComplyCube's terms of service. The PHP library and the web, iOS and Android SDK repositories are MIT, and @complycube/api on npm is MITProprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the OpenAPI file states its licence as Proprietary
Tools exposednone9
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-062026-10-06
Terms last updatedno date givenno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno date givenno date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularity6.2k npm/wk, 292 PyPI/wk35k npm/wk

Verdicts

ComplyCube

A sandbox with its own key and scripted outcomes, a public OpenAPI spec, Markdown docs and an audit log API suit an agent running verification checks. Each environment has one unscoped key, no idempotency keys were found, and the only published terms are undated and read as website terms.

Socure RiskOS

A public OpenAPI file, llms.txt, 15 documented error codes and dated release notes cover a ten-operation REST API, and Socure Launch publishes prices from $0.80 an evaluation with a free sandbox. API keys carry no scopes, no idempotency header is defined, no service terms are published, and production stays at zero requests until Socure activates it.

Before you call either

ComplyCube

  1. Send the key bare in the Authorization header, with no Bearer prefix. Keys start test_ or live_
  2. Create a client first, then documents or live photos for it, then POST /v1/checks with the client and upload IDs
  3. Stay under 10 requests a second live and 5 in the sandbox. On 429, back off exponentially with jitter, starting at 30 seconds
  4. A badly formed filter returns 200 with no results, so check filter names before trusting an empty list
  5. Checks are asynchronous. Subscribe to webhooks, verify the ComplyCube-Signature HMAC-SHA256 header, and expect duplicate and out-of-order events

Socure RiskOS

  1. Send Authorization: Bearer <key> to https://riskos.sandbox.socure.com/api/evaluation for tests and https://riskos.socure.com/api/evaluation for live checks. The two environments use separate keys.
  2. Use dummy data only in the sandbox. It returns predefined results, connects to no live data source and expects the documented test values.
  3. Store the eval_id from every POST /api/evaluation response. No list or search endpoint exists to find it later.
  4. On 429 wait the seconds given in X-Retry-After. Do not blindly resend a failed POST /api/evaluation, because no idempotency header is documented and Launch bills each initiated evaluation.
  5. The MCP server at https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox reads docs, workflows and webhooks with its own MCP Server Key. It cannot run evaluations or read results.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, ComplyCube or Socure RiskOS?

ComplyCube and Socure RiskOS score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63.7 (B) and 63.5 (B). Socure RiskOS leads on schema & documentation, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.

Do ComplyCube and Socure RiskOS need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call ComplyCube and Socure RiskOS without installing anything?

Yes. ComplyCube has a hosted endpoint at https://api.complycube.com and Socure RiskOS at https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox.

Other comparisons with ComplyCube or Socure RiskOS

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.