# ComplyCube vs Socure RiskOS

> ComplyCube and Socure RiskOS score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63.7 (B) and 63.5 (B). Socure RiskOS leads on schema & documentation, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity. Category scores, facts, verdicts and…

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-socure-riskos
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-socure-riskos.md (~2,350 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-socure-riskos.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-socure-riskos.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-09

ComplyCube and Socure RiskOS score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63.7 (B) and 63.5 (B). Socure RiskOS leads on schema & documentation, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity.

- ComplyCube: grade B, 63.7/100, rank #343 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complycube.json
- Socure RiskOS: grade B, 63.5/100, rank #357 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/socure-riskos.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/socure-riskos.json

## Which one, for what

### ComplyCube (B)

Good for: An agent that creates clients, uploads documents, starts document, identity and AML screening checks and reads results for a regulated business, with low entry cost ($99 a month) and a scripted sandbox.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 84 against 75
- Agent ergonomics, 60 against 46

Watch for: One API key per environment with no scopes. The docs say keys carry many privileges

### Socure RiskOS (B)

Good for: A company in the United States that wants one decision from combined KYC, document, fraud and watchlist checks through a single evaluation call.

Ahead on:
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 78
- Security & auth, 60 against 52
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 27
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 63

Watch for: No service agreement or API terms are published. The only terms pages are website terms of use and end-user terms for document capture


## Score by category

| Category | Weight | ComplyCube | Socure RiskOS | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 84 | 75 | ComplyCube +9 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 78 | 84 | Socure RiskOS +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 60 | 46 | ComplyCube +14 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 52 | 60 | Socure RiskOS +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 27 | 35 | Socure RiskOS +8 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 74 | 75 | Socure RiskOS +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 63 | 68 | Socure RiskOS +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **63.7 · B** | **63.5 · B** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | ComplyCube | Socure RiskOS |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | ComplyCube (Teemo Technology Ltd) | Socure Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.complycube.com` | `https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under ComplyCube's terms of service. The PHP library and the web, iOS and Android SDK repositories are MIT, and `@complycube/api` on npm is MIT | Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the OpenAPI file states its licence as Proprietary |
| Tools exposed | none | 9 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | 6.2k npm/wk, 292 PyPI/wk | 35k npm/wk |

## Verdicts

**ComplyCube.** A sandbox with its own key and scripted outcomes, a public OpenAPI spec, Markdown docs and an audit log API suit an agent running verification checks. Each environment has one unscoped key, no idempotency keys were found, and the only published terms are undated and read as website terms.

**Socure RiskOS.** A public OpenAPI file, llms.txt, 15 documented error codes and dated release notes cover a ten-operation REST API, and Socure Launch publishes prices from $0.80 an evaluation with a free sandbox. API keys carry no scopes, no idempotency header is defined, no service terms are published, and production stays at zero requests until Socure activates it.

## Before you call either

### ComplyCube

1. Send the key bare in the `Authorization` header, with no Bearer prefix. Keys start `test_` or `live_`
2. Create a client first, then documents or live photos for it, then `POST /v1/checks` with the client and upload IDs
3. Stay under 10 requests a second live and 5 in the sandbox. On 429, back off exponentially with jitter, starting at 30 seconds
4. A badly formed filter returns 200 with no results, so check filter names before trusting an empty list
5. Checks are asynchronous. Subscribe to webhooks, verify the `ComplyCube-Signature` HMAC-SHA256 header, and expect duplicate and out-of-order events

### Socure RiskOS

1. Send `Authorization: Bearer <key>` to `https://riskos.sandbox.socure.com/api/evaluation` for tests and `https://riskos.socure.com/api/evaluation` for live checks. The two environments use separate keys.
2. Use dummy data only in the sandbox. It returns predefined results, connects to no live data source and expects the documented test values.
3. Store the `eval_id` from every `POST /api/evaluation` response. No list or search endpoint exists to find it later.
4. On 429 wait the seconds given in `X-Retry-After`. Do not blindly resend a failed `POST /api/evaluation`, because no idempotency header is documented and Launch bills each initiated evaluation.
5. The MCP server at `https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox` reads docs, workflows and webhooks with its own MCP Server Key. It cannot run evaluations or read results.

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, ComplyCube or Socure RiskOS?

ComplyCube and Socure RiskOS score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63.7 (B) and 63.5 (B). Socure RiskOS leads on schema & documentation, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.

### Do ComplyCube and Socure RiskOS need an API key?

Both need an API key.

### Can an agent call ComplyCube and Socure RiskOS without installing anything?

Yes. ComplyCube has a hosted endpoint at https://api.complycube.com and Socure RiskOS at https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-socure-riskos.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-socure-riskos.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "complycube", "b": "socure-riskos"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare complycube socure-riskos`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complycube.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/socure-riskos.json

## Other comparisons with ComplyCube or Socure RiskOS

- [ComplyCube vs Didit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-didit.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Jumio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-jumio.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Middesk](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-middesk.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Persona](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-persona.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Shufti](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-shufti.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Sumsub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-sumsub.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Trulioo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-trulioo.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff.md)
- [Didit vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Jumio vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jumio-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Persona vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/persona-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Shufti vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shufti-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Socure RiskOS vs Sumsub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/socure-riskos-vs-sumsub.md)
- [Socure RiskOS vs Trulioo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/socure-riskos-vs-trulioo.md)
- [Socure RiskOS vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/socure-riskos-vs-veriff.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs ComplyCube](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Middesk vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/middesk-vs-socure-riskos.md)