# Didit vs Socure RiskOS (slim)

> Didit scores 75 (BB) on agent readiness against Socure RiskOS's 63.5 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Socure RiskOS leads on transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-socure-riskos.md (~2,400 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-socure-riskos.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-socure-riskos
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Didit scores 75 (BB) on agent readiness against Socure RiskOS's 63.5 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Socure RiskOS leads on transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity.

- Didit: BB 75, rank #60 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/didit.min.md
- Socure RiskOS: B 63.5, rank #357 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/socure-riskos.min.md
- Didit, good for A team that wants document, liveness, screening and business registry checks from one API with public prices and no sales step, and an agent that has to set itself up. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 75; Agent ergonomics, 69 against 46; Security & auth, 76 against 60; Payments & pricing, 60 against 35; Maintenance & community, 82 against 75. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Runs on your own machine; Free to start without a card.
- Socure RiskOS, good for A company in the United States that wants one decision from combined KYC, document, fraud and watchlist checks through a single evaluation call. Ahead on Transparency & trust, 68 against 63.

| Category | Didit | Socure RiskOS |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 80 | 75 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 84 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 69 | 46 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 76 | 60 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 75 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Didit | Socure RiskOS |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Didit Identity Spain, S.L. | Socure Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://verification.didit.me` | `https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Didit's Business Terms and Conditions. The MCP server in didit-protocol/mcp is MIT | Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the OpenAPI file states its licence as Proprietary |
| Tools exposed | 156 | 9 |
| MCP registry | `me.didit/mcp` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-23 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-07 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | 0 stars, 27k npm/wk | 35k npm/wk |