Head to head · Finetune sft · October 2026 research run
Together AI Fine-tuning vs Unsloth
Together AI Fine-tuning has a score of 54.9 (C) against Unsloth's 51.7 (D). Both do finetune sft. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 40 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Together AI Fine-tuning for
- reliability (+12)
- schema & documentation (+12)
- security & auth (+15)
- transparency & trust (+36)
Pick Unsloth for
- agent ergonomics (+11)
- payments & pricing (+40)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Together AI Fine-tuning | Unsloth | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 43 | Together AI Fine-tuning +12 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 66 | Together AI Fine-tuning +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 42 | 53 | Unsloth +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 35 | Together AI Fine-tuning +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 60 | Unsloth +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 82 | Unsloth +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 70 | 34 | Together AI Fine-tuning +36 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 54.9 · C | 51.7 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Together AI Fine-tuning | Unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Agent framework |
| Vendor | Together AI | Unsloth |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.together.ai/v1 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (SDKs) | Apache-2.0 (core), AGPL-3.0 (Studio UI) |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-28 |
| Popularity | 10 stars, 118k npm/wk, 369k PyPI/wk | 77k stars, 230k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Together AI Fine-tuning
31 tunable base models, 11 or 12 of them with full fine-tuning as well as LoRA. Fine-tuned models don't run serverless; dedicated endpoints start at $5.49 an hour.
Unsloth
The Apache-2.0 core runs on customer hardware and keeps model weights there. Users supply and pay for the GPU.
Before you call either
Together AI Fine-tuning
- Call POST /v1/fine-tunes/estimate-price with the same body before creating the job, and check the model's minimum charge
- Read
lora_training.max_rankfrom the model limits response before settinglora_r; most models went to 128 on 2026-09-29 - Don't retry a create call blindly after a timeout; there's no idempotency key, so list jobs and check first
- Download with checkpoint=adapter if you'll merge locally; merged weights for a 70B model are a large stream
- Tear down the dedicated endpoint once evaluation ends, since it bills while idle
Unsloth
- Install with
uv pip install unsloth --torch-backend=autoon a CUDA machine; the desktop app is for people - Start from the notebook for the model family in unslothai/notebooks; it sets LoRA targets and the chat template
- Save the LoRA adapter while iterating and merge to 16-bit or GGUF only when you ship
- If Studio must be reachable by other agents, pass --disable-tools and keep it on 127.0.0.1 behind a tunnel
- Pin the exact unsloth version; releases land several times a week and don't flag breaking changes
Other comparisons with Together AI Fine-tuning or Unsloth
- Microsoft Foundry fine-tuning (Azure OpenAI) vs Together AI Fine-tuning
- Microsoft Foundry fine-tuning (Azure OpenAI) vs Unsloth
- Fireworks AI Fine-tuning vs Together AI Fine-tuning
- Fireworks AI Fine-tuning vs Unsloth
- Tinker vs Together AI Fine-tuning
- Tinker vs Unsloth
- Together AI Fine-tuning vs Vertex AI Gemini tuning
- Unsloth vs Vertex AI Gemini tuning