Head to head · Finetune sft · October 2026 research run

Fireworks AI Fine-tuning vs Together AI Fine-tuning

Fireworks AI Fine-tuning has a score of 59.2 (C) against Together AI Fine-tuning's 54.9 (C). Both do finetune sft. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 33 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Fireworks AI Fine-tuning for

  • agent ergonomics (+33)
  • security & auth (+15)
  • payments & pricing (+5)

Pick Together AI Fine-tuning for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFireworks AI Fine-tuningTogether AI Fine-tuningEdge
Reliability16%205555even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27778Together AI Fine-tuning +1
Agent ergonomics13%16.27542Fireworks AI Fine-tuning +33
Security & auth14%17.56550Fireworks AI Fine-tuning +15
Payments & pricing10%12.52520Fireworks AI Fine-tuning +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88280Fireworks AI Fine-tuning +2
Transparency & trust7%8.86670Together AI Fine-tuning +4
Negative events≤15-40
Total59.2 · C54.9 · C

Facts side by side

FactFireworks AI Fine-tuningTogether AI Fine-tuning
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorFireworks AITogether AI
Hosted endpointhttps://api.fireworks.aihttps://api.together.ai/v1
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPay per usePay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (SDK)Apache-2.0 (SDKs)
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-10-012026-09-30
Popularity7 stars, 290k PyPI/wk10 stars, 118k npm/wk, 369k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Fireworks AI Fine-tuning

SFT, DPO, ORPO and RFT as managed jobs, plus a serverless Training API that is generally available. Tuned LoRAs only deploy to on-demand GPUs at $8 an hour and up, never to serverless.

Together AI Fine-tuning

31 tunable base models, 11 or 12 of them with full fine-tuning as well as LoRA. Fine-tuned models don't run serverless; dedicated endpoints start at $5.49 an hour.

Before you call either

Fireworks AI Fine-tuning

  1. Add a payment method before the first job; without one the account has 0 training GPUs and 10 requests a minute
  2. Check firectl model get -a fireworks <MODEL-ID> for Tunable: true before uploading a dataset
  3. Pass your own supervisedFineTuningJobId on create, so after a timeout you can GET the job by that name instead of guessing whether it started
  4. Deploy the LoRA to an on-demand deployment with a BF16 shape if several adapters will share it, and delete the deployment when evaluation ends
  5. Download with firectl model download and keep the exact base model; the adapter alone won't run

Together AI Fine-tuning

  1. Call POST /v1/fine-tunes/estimate-price with the same body before creating the job, and check the model's minimum charge
  2. Read lora_training.max_rank from the model limits response before setting lora_r; most models went to 128 on 2026-09-29
  3. Don't retry a create call blindly after a timeout; there's no idempotency key, so list jobs and check first
  4. Download with checkpoint=adapter if you'll merge locally; merged weights for a 70B model are a large stream
  5. Tear down the dedicated endpoint once evaluation ends, since it bills while idle

Other comparisons with Fireworks AI Fine-tuning or Together AI Fine-tuning

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.