Head to head · Finetune sft · October 2026 research run
Axolotl vs Together AI Fine-tuning
Axolotl scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against Together AI Fine-tuning's 54.7 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Together AI Fine-tuning leads on transparency & trust. Both do finetune sft.
Which one, for what
Axolotl B
Good for A team that wants a repeatable, config-driven fine-tune of an open model on its own or rented GPUs, including multi-GPU and multi-node runs.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 64 against 55
- Agent ergonomics, 60 against 42
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 80
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
Telemetry to PostHog is on by default and delays training start by 10 seconds until the variable is set either way
Good for Teams that want to tune a large open model, possibly with full fine-tuning, and take the weights away.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 56
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Fine-tuned models don't run serverless; dedicated endpoints start at $5.49 an hour
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Axolotl | Together AI Fine-tuning | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 64 | 55 | Axolotl +9 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 80 | 78 | Axolotl +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 60 | 42 | Axolotl +18 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 50 | Axolotl +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 20 | Axolotl +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 88 | 80 | Axolotl +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 68 | Together AI Fine-tuning +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 64.8 · B | 54.7 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Axolotl | Together AI Fine-tuning |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent framework | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Axolotl AI | Together AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.together.ai/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| Price for finetune sft | free | $0.34 per 1M tokens |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (SDKs) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 13k stars, 2.1k PyPI/wk | 10 stars, 118k npm/wk, 369k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Axolotl
Axolotl runs a whole fine-tuning job from one YAML file and ships a JSON Schema of its config plus bundled agent docs. It is 0.x software with telemetry on by default, no terms or privacy policy, and the owner supplies the GPU.
Together AI Fine-tuning
31 tunable base models, 11 or 12 of them with full fine-tuning as well as LoRA. Fine-tuned models don't run serverless; dedicated endpoints start at $5.49 an hour.
Before you call either
Axolotl
- Set
AXOLOTL_DO_NOT_TRACK=1before any command, or training waits 10 seconds and sends usage events to PostHog - Run
axolotl agent-docsandaxolotl config-schema --field <name>before writing a config; both work offline from the installed package - Install torch first, then
uv pip install --no-build-isolation axolotl[deepspeed], on Python 3.12 or later with PyTorch 2.13 or later - Take example configs from the same release tag as the installed version; minor releases remove and rename config keys
- Resume an interrupted run with
axolotl train config.yml --resume-from-checkpoint <path>, thenaxolotl merge-loraandaxolotl exportonly when shipping
Together AI Fine-tuning
- Call POST /v1/fine-tunes/estimate-price with the same body before creating the job, and check the model's minimum charge
- Read
lora_training.max_rankfrom the model limits response before settinglora_r; most models went to 128 on 2026-09-29 - Don't retry a create call blindly after a timeout; there's no idempotency key, so list jobs and check first
- Download with checkpoint=adapter if you'll merge locally; merged weights for a 70B model are a large stream
- Tear down the dedicated endpoint once evaluation ends, since it bills while idle
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Axolotl or Together AI Fine-tuning?
Axolotl scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against Together AI Fine-tuning's 54.7 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Together AI Fine-tuning leads on transparency & trust.
Which is cheaper for finetune sft, Axolotl or Together AI Fine-tuning?
Axolotl, at free against $0.34 per 1M tokens for Together AI Fine-tuning. These are the vendors' published prices for the job.
Can an agent call Axolotl and Together AI Fine-tuning without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Axolotl. Together AI Fine-tuning has a hosted endpoint at https://api.together.ai/v1.
Are Axolotl and Together AI Fine-tuning open source?
Axolotl is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Together AI Fine-tuning.
Other comparisons with Axolotl or Together AI Fine-tuning
- Amazon Bedrock model customisation vs Axolotl
- Amazon Bedrock model customisation vs Together AI Fine-tuning
- Axolotl vs Microsoft Foundry fine-tuning (Azure OpenAI)
- Axolotl vs Fireworks AI Fine-tuning
- Axolotl vs Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning
- Axolotl vs Tinker
- Axolotl vs Unsloth
- Axolotl vs Vertex AI Gemini tuning
- Microsoft Foundry fine-tuning (Azure OpenAI) vs Together AI Fine-tuning
- Fireworks AI Fine-tuning vs Together AI Fine-tuning
- Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning vs Together AI Fine-tuning
- Tinker vs Together AI Fine-tuning
- Together AI Fine-tuning vs Unsloth
- Together AI Fine-tuning vs Vertex AI Gemini tuning
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/axolotl-vs-together-fine-tuning.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/axolotl.json·/api/v1/tools/together-fine-tuning.json - From a terminal
anchor compare axolotl together-fine-tuning(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "axolotl", "b": "together-fine-tuning"}at/mcp, no key