Head to head · Finetune sft · October 2026 research run

Axolotl vs Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning

Axolotl scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning's 47.7 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning leads on transparency & trust. Both do finetune sft.

Which one, for what

Axolotl B

Good for A team that wants a repeatable, config-driven fine-tune of an open model on its own or rented GPUs, including multi-GPU and multi-node runs.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 64 against 45
  • Schema & documentation, 80 against 68
  • Agent ergonomics, 60 against 51
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 0
  • Maintenance & community, 88 against 61

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

Telemetry to PostHog is on by default and delays training start by 10 seconds until the variable is set either way

Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning D

Good for Teams that want supervised LoRA or full fine-tuning of a wide list of open models, up to Qwen3 Coder 480B and DeepSeek, through OpenAI-style calls, with EU storage and the weights to take away.

Ahead on

  • Transparency & trust, 79 against 56

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

No fine-tuning price found in the docs or the public catalogue JSON. The price page is a script-drawn console page that robots.txt disallows

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAxolotlNebius Token Factory fine-tuningEdge
Reliability16%206445Axolotl +19
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28068Axolotl +12
Agent ergonomics13%16.26051Axolotl +9
Security & auth14%17.55252even
Payments & pricing10%12.5600Axolotl +60
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88861Axolotl +27
Transparency & trust7%8.85679Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning +23
Negative events≤150-2
Total64.8 · B47.7 · D

Facts side by side

FactAxolotlNebius Token Factory fine-tuning
KindAgent frameworkHTTP API
VendorAxolotl AINebius
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.tokenfactory.nebius.com/v1
TransportsHTTP
AuthNoneAPI key
PricingFreePay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Proprietary service (cookbook examples MIT)
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-09-302026-09-30
Terms last updatedno document linked2026-09-28
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2026-09-23
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity13k stars, 2.1k PyPI/wknone

Verdicts

Axolotl

Axolotl runs a whole fine-tuning job from one YAML file and ships a JSON Schema of its config plus bundled agent docs. It is 0.x software with telemetry on by default, no terms or privacy policy, and the owner supplies the GPU.

Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning

Supervised fine-tuning on 49 open base models through OpenAI-style /v1/fine_tuning/jobs calls, with LoRA or full weights and every checkpoint file downloadable. No fine-tuning price was found outside the script-drawn console, and the docs say tuned models deploy only to dedicated endpoints, with custom weights in beta on request.

Before you call either

Axolotl

  1. Set AXOLOTL_DO_NOT_TRACK=1 before any command, or training waits 10 seconds and sends usage events to PostHog
  2. Run axolotl agent-docs and axolotl config-schema --field <name> before writing a config; both work offline from the installed package
  3. Install torch first, then uv pip install --no-build-isolation axolotl[deepspeed], on Python 3.12 or later with PyTorch 2.13 or later
  4. Take example configs from the same release tag as the installed version; minor releases remove and rename config keys
  5. Resume an interrupted run with axolotl train config.yml --resume-from-checkpoint <path>, then axolotl merge-lora and axolotl export only when shipping

Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning

  1. Use the OpenAI client with base_url https://api.tokenfactory.nebius.com/v1/ and NEBIUS_API_KEY. Upload JSONL with purpose=fine-tune, then create the job.
  2. Set hyperparameters.lora to true for an adapter. The default is false, which runs full fine-tuning.
  3. Poll GET /v1/fine_tuning/jobs/{job_id} no faster than every 15 seconds. There is no idempotency key, so list jobs before recreating one after a timeout.
  4. Download every ID in a checkpoint's result_files before relying on hosted copies. The terms allow deletion of tuned models at three days' notice.
  5. The spec requires wandb.api_key although the guide omits it, and it also accepts mlflow and hf integrations. Check the price in the console before starting a job.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Axolotl or Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning?

Axolotl scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning's 47.7 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning leads on transparency & trust.

Can an agent call Axolotl and Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Axolotl. Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning has a hosted endpoint at https://api.tokenfactory.nebius.com/v1.

Are Axolotl and Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning open source?

Axolotl is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning.

Other comparisons with Axolotl or Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.