# Axolotl vs Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning > Axolotl scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning's 47.7 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning leads on transparency & trust. Both do finetune sft. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by… - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.md (~2,450 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-09 Axolotl scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning's 47.7 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning leads on transparency & trust. Both do finetune sft. - Axolotl: grade B, 64.8/100, rank #307 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/axolotl.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/axolotl.json - Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning: grade D, 47.7/100, rank #738 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.json ## Which one, for what ### Axolotl (B) Good for: A team that wants a repeatable, config-driven fine-tune of an open model on its own or rented GPUs, including multi-GPU and multi-node runs. Ahead on: - Reliability, 64 against 45 - Schema & documentation, 80 against 68 - Agent ergonomics, 60 against 51 - Payments & pricing, 60 against 0 - Maintenance & community, 88 against 61 Also in its favour: - No key needed to call it - Open source Watch for: Telemetry to PostHog is on by default and delays training start by 10 seconds until the variable is set either way ### Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning (D) Good for: Teams that want supervised LoRA or full fine-tuning of a wide list of open models, up to Qwen3 Coder 480B and DeepSeek, through OpenAI-style calls, with EU storage and the weights to take away. Ahead on: - Transparency & trust, 79 against 56 Also in its favour: - A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install Watch for: No fine-tuning price found in the docs or the public catalogue JSON. The price page is a script-drawn console page that robots.txt disallows ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Axolotl | Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 64 | 45 | Axolotl +19 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 80 | 68 | Axolotl +12 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 60 | 51 | Axolotl +9 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 52 | 52 | even | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 0 | Axolotl +60 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 88 | 61 | Axolotl +27 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 56 | 79 | Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning +23 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | | | **Total** | | **64.8 · B** | **47.7 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Axolotl | Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | Agent framework | HTTP API | | Vendor | Axolotl AI | Nebius | | Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.tokenfactory.nebius.com/v1` | | Transports | | HTTP | | Auth | None | API key | | Pricing | Free | Pay per use | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary service (cookbook examples MIT) | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | no | yes | | Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-30 | | Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-09-28 | | Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-09-23 | | Customer content may train models | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict benchmarking | | yes | | Terms or service can change without notice | | not found in the text | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | | yes | | Popularity | 13k stars, 2.1k PyPI/wk | none | ## Verdicts **Axolotl.** Axolotl runs a whole fine-tuning job from one YAML file and ships a JSON Schema of its config plus bundled agent docs. It is 0.x software with telemetry on by default, no terms or privacy policy, and the owner supplies the GPU. **Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning.** Supervised fine-tuning on 49 open base models through OpenAI-style `/v1/fine_tuning/jobs` calls, with LoRA or full weights and every checkpoint file downloadable. No fine-tuning price was found outside the script-drawn console, and the docs say tuned models deploy only to dedicated endpoints, with custom weights in beta on request. ## Before you call either ### Axolotl 1. Set `AXOLOTL_DO_NOT_TRACK=1` before any command, or training waits 10 seconds and sends usage events to PostHog 2. Run `axolotl agent-docs` and `axolotl config-schema --field ` before writing a config; both work offline from the installed package 3. Install torch first, then `uv pip install --no-build-isolation axolotl[deepspeed]`, on Python 3.12 or later with PyTorch 2.13 or later 4. Take example configs from the same release tag as the installed version; minor releases remove and rename config keys 5. Resume an interrupted run with `axolotl train config.yml --resume-from-checkpoint `, then `axolotl merge-lora` and `axolotl export` only when shipping ### Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning 1. Use the OpenAI client with `base_url` `https://api.tokenfactory.nebius.com/v1/` and `NEBIUS_API_KEY`. Upload JSONL with `purpose=fine-tune`, then create the job. 2. Set `hyperparameters.lora` to true for an adapter. The default is false, which runs full fine-tuning. 3. Poll `GET /v1/fine_tuning/jobs/{job_id}` no faster than every 15 seconds. There is no idempotency key, so list jobs before recreating one after a timeout. 4. Download every ID in a checkpoint's `result_files` before relying on hosted copies. The terms allow deletion of tuned models at three days' notice. 5. The spec requires `wandb.api_key` although the guide omits it, and it also accepts `mlflow` and `hf` integrations. Check the price in the console before starting a job. ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Axolotl or Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning? Axolotl scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning's 47.7 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning leads on transparency & trust. ### Can an agent call Axolotl and Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning without installing anything? No hosted endpoint is listed for Axolotl. Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning has a hosted endpoint at https://api.tokenfactory.nebius.com/v1. ### Are Axolotl and Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning open source? Axolotl is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "axolotl", "b": "nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare axolotl nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/axolotl.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.json ## Other comparisons with Axolotl or Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning - [Amazon Bedrock model customisation vs Axolotl](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-customization-vs-axolotl.md) - [Amazon Bedrock model customisation vs Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-customization-vs-nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.md) - [Axolotl vs Microsoft Foundry fine-tuning (Azure OpenAI)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-azure-foundry-fine-tuning.md) - [Axolotl vs Fireworks AI Fine-tuning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-fireworks-fine-tuning.md) - [Axolotl vs Tinker](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-tinker.md) - [Axolotl vs Together AI Fine-tuning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-together-fine-tuning.md) - [Axolotl vs Unsloth](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-unsloth.md) - [Axolotl vs Vertex AI Gemini tuning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axolotl-vs-vertex-ai-tuning.md) - [Microsoft Foundry fine-tuning (Azure OpenAI) vs Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-foundry-fine-tuning-vs-nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.md) - [Fireworks AI Fine-tuning vs Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-fine-tuning-vs-nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning.md) - [Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning vs Tinker](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning-vs-tinker.md) - [Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning vs Together AI Fine-tuning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning-vs-together-fine-tuning.md) - [Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning vs Unsloth](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning-vs-unsloth.md) - [Nebius Token Factory fine-tuning vs Vertex AI Gemini tuning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nebius-token-factory-fine-tuning-vs-vertex-ai-tuning.md)