Tinker vs Together AI Fine-tuning

Tinker

Full control of the training loop with the GPUs abstracted away, plus recipes for SFT, DPO, RL and distillation. LoRA only; no full-parameter training.

Together AI Fine-tuning

31 tunable base models, 11 or 12 of them with full fine-tuning as well as LoRA. Fine-tuned models don't run serverless; dedicated endpoints start at $5.49 an hour.

Tinker

1. Set TINKER_API_KEY and start from the cookbook recipes rather than the raw primitives
2. Read the 'Avoid Client-Side Timeouts and Retries' guide before wrapping sampling calls in your own retries; the SDK already retries sampling with stable request IDs
3. Save intermediate checkpoints with a TTL between 1 hour and 10 years; storage bills at $0.10 a GB-month until they expire
4. Read models.json for current prices before a run; sampling tokens cost more than training tokens on the open models
5. Check the model deprecations page before pinning a base model; 18 were retired on 2026-06-12

Together AI Fine-tuning

1. Call POST /v1/fine-tunes/estimate-price with the same body before creating the job, and check the model's minimum charge
2. Read lora_training.max_rank from the model limits response before setting lora_r; most models went to 128 on 2026-09-29
3. Don't retry a create call blindly after a timeout; there's no idempotency key, so list jobs and check first
4. Download with checkpoint=adapter if you'll merge locally; merged weights for a 70B model are a large stream
5. Tear down the dedicated endpoint once evaluation ends, since it bills while idle