Head to head · Finetune sft · October 2026 research run

Fireworks AI Fine-tuning vs Unsloth

Fireworks AI Fine-tuning has a score of 59.2 (C) against Unsloth's 51.7 (D). Both do finetune sft. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 35 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Fireworks AI Fine-tuning for

  • reliability (+12)
  • schema & documentation (+11)
  • agent ergonomics (+22)
  • security & auth (+30)
  • transparency & trust (+32)

Pick Unsloth for

  • payments & pricing (+35)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFireworks AI Fine-tuningUnslothEdge
Reliability16%205543Fireworks AI Fine-tuning +12
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27766Fireworks AI Fine-tuning +11
Agent ergonomics13%16.27553Fireworks AI Fine-tuning +22
Security & auth14%17.56535Fireworks AI Fine-tuning +30
Payments & pricing10%12.52560Unsloth +35
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88282even
Transparency & trust7%8.86634Fireworks AI Fine-tuning +32
Negative events≤15-40
Total59.2 · C51.7 · D

Facts side by side

FactFireworks AI Fine-tuningUnsloth
KindHTTP APIAgent framework
VendorFireworks AIUnsloth
Hosted endpointhttps://api.fireworks.aino (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingPay per useFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (SDK)Apache-2.0 (core), AGPL-3.0 (Studio UI)
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-10-012026-09-28
Popularity7 stars, 290k PyPI/wk77k stars, 230k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Fireworks AI Fine-tuning

SFT, DPO, ORPO and RFT as managed jobs, plus a serverless Training API that is generally available. Tuned LoRAs only deploy to on-demand GPUs at $8 an hour and up, never to serverless.

Unsloth

The Apache-2.0 core runs on customer hardware and keeps model weights there. Users supply and pay for the GPU.

Before you call either

Fireworks AI Fine-tuning

  1. Add a payment method before the first job; without one the account has 0 training GPUs and 10 requests a minute
  2. Check firectl model get -a fireworks <MODEL-ID> for Tunable: true before uploading a dataset
  3. Pass your own supervisedFineTuningJobId on create, so after a timeout you can GET the job by that name instead of guessing whether it started
  4. Deploy the LoRA to an on-demand deployment with a BF16 shape if several adapters will share it, and delete the deployment when evaluation ends
  5. Download with firectl model download and keep the exact base model; the adapter alone won't run

Unsloth

  1. Install with uv pip install unsloth --torch-backend=auto on a CUDA machine; the desktop app is for people
  2. Start from the notebook for the model family in unslothai/notebooks; it sets LoRA targets and the chat template
  3. Save the LoRA adapter while iterating and merge to 16-bit or GGUF only when you ship
  4. If Studio must be reachable by other agents, pass --disable-tools and keep it on 127.0.0.1 behind a tunnel
  5. Pin the exact unsloth version; releases land several times a week and don't flag breaking changes

Other comparisons with Fireworks AI Fine-tuning or Unsloth

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.