Head to head · Auth oauth · October 2026 research run

Nango vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents

Nango has a score of 67.9 (B) against WorkOS Pipes and Agents's 60 (C). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 32 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Nango for

  • reliability (+8)
  • schema & documentation (+32)
  • agent ergonomics (+5)
  • payments & pricing (+30)
  • maintenance & community (+7)
  • transparency & trust (+14)

Pick WorkOS Pipes and Agents for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runNangoWorkOS Pipes and AgentsEdge
Reliability16%207870Nango +8
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28553Nango +32
Agent ergonomics13%16.27469Nango +5
Security & auth14%17.56769WorkOS Pipes and Agents +2
Payments & pricing10%12.54010Nango +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.89083Nango +7
Transparency & trust7%8.87864Nango +14
Negative events≤15-50
Total67.9 · B60 · C

Facts side by side

FactNangoWorkOS Pipes and Agents
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorNangoWorkOS
Hosted endpointhttps://api.nango.devhttps://api.workos.com
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceElastic License 2.0MIT (SDKs), platform closed
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registrynot listedcom.workos/mcp
Last release2026-09-302026-09-28
Popularity469k npm/wk221 stars, 4M npm/wk, 1.7M PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Nango

1,000+ APIs with OAuth, API key and client-credentials auth handled. Audit trail only on Enterprise, and logs kept 15 days on every plan.

WorkOS Pipes and Agents

Agent identity with per-session revocation and token lifetimes set per blueprint. 21 incidents on the status page since 3 July 2026, several over an hour.

Before you call either

Nango

  1. Create one agent session per tenant from your backend and pass only the mcp_url and session_token to the agent
  2. Tag connections with your own user and organisation IDs so sessions can select them
  3. Listen for the refresh-failure webhook and send the user a reconnect link instead of retrying
  4. Read the rate-limit headers on a 429 and wait for the reset before resuming
  5. Run 0.71.6 or later when self-hosting, and keep the runner port off the network

WorkOS Pipes and Agents

  1. Call POST /data-integrations/{provider}/token with user_id for each use and don't cache the token
  2. Branch on active in the response and send the user to reconnect on needs_reauthorization
  3. Wait for Retry-After on a 429, or back off with jitter when it's missing
  4. Use lower-case provider slugs such as github or slack
  5. Revoke an agent's session through the Agents API when a task ends instead of waiting for expiry

Other comparisons with Nango or WorkOS Pipes and Agents

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.