Head to head · Auth oauth · October 2026 research run
Arcade.dev vs Nango
Nango has a score of 67.9 (B) against Arcade.dev's 67 (B). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 16 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Arcade.dev for
- agent ergonomics (+5)
Pick Nango for
- reliability (+15)
- maintenance & community (+16)
- transparency & trust (+6)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Arcade.dev | Nango | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 63 | 78 | Nango +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 82 | 85 | Nango +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 79 | 74 | Arcade.dev +5 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 71 | 67 | Arcade.dev +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 74 | 90 | Nango +16 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 72 | 78 | Nango +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | -5 | |
| Total | 67 · B | 67.9 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Arcade.dev | Nango |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Arcade.dev | Nango |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.arcade.dev | https://api.nango.dev |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (arcade-mcp framework and SDKs), platform closed | Elastic License 2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 1k stars, 125k npm/wk, 70k PyPI/wk | 469k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Arcade.dev
Consent flow, token storage and refresh, and tool execution in one service, so the model never holds a provider token. The terms of 15 July 2025 call the service an early version provided as is, with no uptime commitment below Enterprise.
Nango
1,000+ APIs with OAuth, API key and client-credentials auth handled. Audit trail only on Enterprise, and logs kept 15 days on every plan.
Before you call either
Arcade.dev
- Call
POST /v1/tools/authorizefirst and send the user the returned URL when the status isn't completed - Pass a stable user ID from your own database as user_id, never a shared value
- Read retry_after_ms on an UpstreamRateLimitError and wait that long before calling again
- Register your own OAuth app and a custom user verifier before real users sign in, because the default apps only accept members of your Arcade project
- Revoke a user's access with
DELETE /v1/admin/user_connections/{id}
Nango
- Create one agent session per tenant from your backend and pass only the mcp_url and session_token to the agent
- Tag connections with your own user and organisation IDs so sessions can select them
- Listen for the refresh-failure webhook and send the user a reconnect link instead of retrying
- Read the rate-limit headers on a 429 and wait for the reset before resuming
- Run 0.71.6 or later when self-hosting, and keep the runner port off the network
Other comparisons with Arcade.dev or Nango
- Arcade.dev vs Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault)
- Arcade.dev vs Descope Agentic Identity Hub
- Arcade.dev vs Keycard
- Arcade.dev vs Scalekit AgentKit
- Arcade.dev vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Arcade.dev vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents
- Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault) vs Nango
- Descope Agentic Identity Hub vs Nango
- Keycard vs Nango
- Nango vs Scalekit AgentKit
- Nango vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Nango vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/arcade.json·/api/v1/tools/nango.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/arcade-vs-nango.md