Head to head · Auth oauth · October 2026 research run
Nango vs Scalekit AgentKit
Scalekit AgentKit has a score of 72.1 (BB) against Nango's 67.9 (B). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 10 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Nango for
- maintenance & community (+10)
- transparency & trust (+10)
Pick Scalekit AgentKit for
- agent ergonomics (+9)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nango | Scalekit AgentKit | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 78 | 75 | Nango +3 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 87 | Scalekit AgentKit +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 83 | Scalekit AgentKit +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 66 | Nango +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 80 | Nango +10 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 78 | 68 | Nango +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | 67.9 · B | 72.1 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nango | Scalekit AgentKit |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Nango | Scalekit |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.nango.dev | https://{env}.scalekit.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Elastic License 2.0 | MIT (SDKs), platform closed, self-hosted on Enterprise |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-29 |
| Popularity | 469k npm/wk | 6 stars, 11k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Nango
1,000+ APIs with OAuth, API key and client-credentials auth handled. Audit trail only on Enterprise, and logs kept 15 days on every plan.
Scalekit AgentKit
500+ connectors, including remote MCP servers over OAuth 2.1 with DCR. No rate limits or idempotency documented for Scalekit's own API.
Before you call either
Nango
- Create one agent session per tenant from your backend and pass only the mcp_url and session_token to the agent
- Tag connections with your own user and organisation IDs so sessions can select them
- Listen for the refresh-failure webhook and send the user a reconnect link instead of retrying
- Read the rate-limit headers on a 429 and wait for the reset before resuming
- Run 0.71.6 or later when self-hosting, and keep the runner port off the network
Scalekit AgentKit
- Use the exact dashboard Connection Name, not the connector slug, in every call
- Call
POST /api/v1/tools:searchwith top_k instead of listing every tool - When a connected account isn't ACTIVE, send the user the magic link and stop until they finish
- On ScalekitToolRateLimitException, back off before retrying, and log the executionId
- Mint a fresh virtual MCP session token per user per run and let it expire
Other comparisons with Nango or Scalekit AgentKit
- Arcade.dev vs Nango
- Arcade.dev vs Scalekit AgentKit
- Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault) vs Nango
- Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault) vs Scalekit AgentKit
- Descope Agentic Identity Hub vs Nango
- Descope Agentic Identity Hub vs Scalekit AgentKit
- Keycard vs Nango
- Keycard vs Scalekit AgentKit
- Nango vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Nango vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents
- Scalekit AgentKit vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Scalekit AgentKit vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/nango.json·/api/v1/tools/scalekit-agentkit.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/nango-vs-scalekit-agentkit.md