Head to head · Auth oauth · October 2026 research run
Nango vs Stytch Connected Apps
Nango has a score of 67.9 (B) against Stytch Connected Apps's 60.8 (C). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 28 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Nango for
- reliability (+5)
- schema & documentation (+21)
- agent ergonomics (+9)
- payments & pricing (+20)
- maintenance & community (+28)
- transparency & trust (+12)
Pick Stytch Connected Apps for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nango | Stytch Connected Apps | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 78 | 73 | Nango +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 64 | Nango +21 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 65 | Nango +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 66 | Nango +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 20 | Nango +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 62 | Nango +28 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 78 | 66 | Nango +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | 67.9 · B | 60.8 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nango | Stytch Connected Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Nango | Stytch (Twilio) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.nango.dev | https://api.stytch.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Elastic License 2.0 | MIT (SDKs), platform closed |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-08-14 |
| Popularity | 469k npm/wk | 116 stars, 349k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Nango
1,000+ APIs with OAuth, API key and client-credentials auth handled. Audit trail only on Enterprise, and logs kept 15 days on every plan.
Stytch Connected Apps
OAuth 2.1 authorisation server with DCR, CIMD and PKCE out of the box. No outbound token vault, so it can't hold your users' third-party tokens.
Before you call either
Nango
- Create one agent session per tenant from your backend and pass only the mcp_url and session_token to the agent
- Tag connections with your own user and organisation IDs so sessions can select them
- Listen for the refresh-failure webhook and send the user a reconnect link instead of retrying
- Read the rate-limit headers on a 429 and wait for the reset before resuming
- Run 0.71.6 or later when self-hosting, and keep the runner port off the network
Stytch Connected Apps
- Fetch
{project-domain}/.well-known/oauth-authorization-serverfirst and use the endpoints it returns, not hard-coded paths - Register with
token_endpoint_auth_methodnone and PKCE S256 when the agent can't keep a secret - Expect a 401 with protected resource metadata from the MCP server, then register and authorise
- Ask only for scopes the user's roles can grant, or the consent page will refuse them
- Back off exponentially on a 429, since no Retry-After header is documented
Other comparisons with Nango or Stytch Connected Apps
- Arcade.dev vs Nango
- Arcade.dev vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault) vs Nango
- Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault) vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Descope Agentic Identity Hub vs Nango
- Descope Agentic Identity Hub vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Keycard vs Nango
- Keycard vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Nango vs Scalekit AgentKit
- Nango vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents
- Scalekit AgentKit vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Stytch Connected Apps vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents