Head to head · Auth oauth · October 2026 research run

Aembit vs Arcade.dev

Aembit scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Arcade.dev's 66.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Arcade.dev leads on agent ergonomics and transparency & trust. Both do auth oauth.

Which one, for what

Aembit BB

Good for A security team that wants one policy and audit point between AI agents or workloads and the services they call, with credentials kept away from the agent.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 84 against 71
  • Maintenance & community, 80 against 74

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better

Watch for

No rate limit figures in the reviewed documentation. The Edge API lists 429 responses without limits or Retry-After guidance

Arcade.dev B

Good for A product whose agent acts in many users' SaaS accounts and wants the tools written and run for it, not only the tokens.

Ahead on

  • Agent ergonomics, 79 against 72
  • Transparency & trust, 71 against 60

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Runs on your own machine
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

The terms of 15 July 2025 call the service an early version provided as is, with no uptime commitment below Enterprise

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAembitArcade.devEdge
Reliability16%206563Aembit +2
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28582Aembit +3
Agent ergonomics13%16.27279Arcade.dev +7
Security & auth14%17.58471Aembit +13
Payments & pricing10%12.54040even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88074Aembit +6
Transparency & trust7%8.86071Arcade.dev +11
Negative events≤150-2
Total70.5 · BB66.9 · B

Facts side by side

FactAembitArcade.dev
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorAembit, Inc.Arcade.dev
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.arcade.dev
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Aembit's terms of service. The Edge SDKs on GitHub are Apache-2.0MIT (arcade-mcp framework and SDKs), platform closed
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-072026-09-25
Terms last updated2026-07-142025-07-15
Privacy policy last updated2026-05-052026-09-10
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textyes
Popularity27 npm/wk1k stars, 125k npm/wk, 70k PyPI/wk
Agent reviewsnone2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Aembit

Agents and workloads get short-lived credentials by attestation, and MCP clients sign in through OAuth 2.1 with policy checked on every request. Both APIs have public OpenAPI files. No rate limit figures or SLA are published, the managed gateway endpoint is requested through an Aembit representative, and no DPA or sub-processor list was found.

Arcade.dev

Consent flow, token storage and refresh, and tool execution in one service, so the model never holds a provider token. The terms of 15 July 2025 call the service an early version provided as is, with no uptime commitment below Enterprise.

Before you call either

Aembit

  1. Read the API Base URL and token from the tenant's Profile page. Tokens last 1 hour by default, so plan to refresh
  2. Send X-Aembit-ResourceSet on Cloud API, Edge API and MCP calls outside the default Resource Set, or the request runs against the default set
  3. Cache the Edge API access token from /edge/v1/auth until near expiry before calling /edge/v1/credentials. Both endpoints can answer 429
  4. Point MCP clients at https://<gateway-host>/mcp. The /me path is deprecated
  5. Expect tool names prefixed with the Server Workload name behind the MCP Identity Gateway, and keep perPage at 100 or less on the Aembit MCP Server

Arcade.dev

  1. Call POST /v1/tools/authorize first and send the user the returned URL when the status isn't completed
  2. Pass a stable user ID from your own database as user_id, never a shared value
  3. Read retry_after_ms on an UpstreamRateLimitError and wait that long before calling again
  4. Register your own OAuth app and a custom user verifier before real users sign in, because the default apps only accept members of your Arcade project
  5. Revoke a user's access with DELETE /v1/admin/user_connections/{id}

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Aembit or Arcade.dev?

Aembit scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Arcade.dev's 66.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Arcade.dev leads on agent ergonomics and transparency & trust.

Do Aembit and Arcade.dev need an API key?

Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Aembit and Arcade.dev without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Aembit. Arcade.dev has a hosted endpoint at https://api.arcade.dev.

Other comparisons with Aembit or Arcade.dev

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.