Head to head · Auth oauth · October 2026 research run
Aembit vs Keycard
Aembit scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Keycard's 56.2 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do auth oauth.
Which one, for what
Aembit BB
Good for A security team that wants one policy and audit point between AI agents or workloads and the services they call, with credentials kept away from the agent.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 35
- Schema & documentation, 85 against 61
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 60
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 44
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
No rate limit figures in the reviewed documentation. The Edge API lists 429 responses without limits or Retry-After guidance
Keycard C
Good for A security-minded team building agents that need their own identities, policy on every delegation and an audit trail per hop, and that is comfortable on an Early Access product.
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Early Access with sign-up by request, and no terms of service page
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Aembit | Keycard | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 35 | Aembit +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 61 | Aembit +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 60 | Aembit +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 84 | 86 | Keycard +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Aembit +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 79 | Aembit +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 44 | Aembit +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 70.5 · BB | 56.2 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Aembit | Keycard |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Aembit, Inc. | Keycard Labs |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.keycard.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Aembit's terms of service. The Edge SDKs on GitHub are Apache-2.0 | MIT (SDKs), Apache-2.0 (keycard-python API client), platform closed, BYOC or on-prem on Enterprise |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-09-22 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-14 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-05 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 27 npm/wk | 1 stars, 52 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Aembit
Agents and workloads get short-lived credentials by attestation, and MCP clients sign in through OAuth 2.1 with policy checked on every request. Both APIs have public OpenAPI files. No rate limit figures or SLA are published, the managed gateway endpoint is requested through an Aembit representative, and no DPA or sub-processor list was found.
Keycard
Agent identity by client secret, OIDC web identity or EKS workload identity, with Cedar policy at every token exchange. Early Access with sign-up by request, and no terms of service page.
Before you call either
Aembit
- Read the API Base URL and token from the tenant's Profile page. Tokens last 1 hour by default, so plan to refresh
- Send
X-Aembit-ResourceSeton Cloud API, Edge API and MCP calls outside the default Resource Set, or the request runs against the default set - Cache the Edge API access token from
/edge/v1/authuntil near expiry before calling/edge/v1/credentials. Both endpoints can answer 429 - Point MCP clients at
https://<gateway-host>/mcp. The/mepath is deprecated - Expect tool names prefixed with the Server Workload name behind the MCP Identity Gateway, and keep
perPageat 100 or less on the Aembit MCP Server
Keycard
- Set audience to the server's registered resource identifier, or the verifier accepts tokens minted for any resource in the zone
- Check
AccessContext.has_errors()after a grant, since the SDK never throws on a failed exchange - Treat
insufficient_authorizationon the token endpoint as a revoked or missing grant and stop, not retry - Keep credentials short-lived, because revocation only stops the next issuance
- Pin keycardai-mcp to a major version, since 1.0.0 and 2.0.0 shipped a day apart
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Aembit or Keycard?
Aembit scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Keycard's 56.2 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Do Aembit and Keycard need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Aembit and Keycard without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Aembit. Keycard has a hosted endpoint at https://api.keycard.ai.
Other comparisons with Aembit or Keycard
- Aembit vs Arcade.dev
- Aembit vs Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault)
- Aembit vs Descope Agentic Identity Hub
- Aembit vs Microsoft Entra Agent ID
- Aembit vs Nango
- Aembit vs Scalekit AgentKit
- Aembit vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Aembit vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents
- Arcade.dev vs Keycard
- Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault) vs Keycard
- Descope Agentic Identity Hub vs Keycard
- Keycard vs Microsoft Entra Agent ID
- Keycard vs Nango
- Keycard vs Scalekit AgentKit
- Keycard vs Stytch Connected Apps
- Keycard vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/aembit-vs-keycard.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/aembit.json·/api/v1/tools/keycard.json - From a terminal
anchor compare aembit keycard(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "aembit", "b": "keycard"}at/mcp, no key