# Nango vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents > Nango has a score of 67.9 (B) against WorkOS Pipes and Agents's 60 (C). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 32 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nango-vs-workos-pipes - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nango-vs-workos-pipes.md (~1,500 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nango-vs-workos-pipes.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nango-vs-workos-pipes.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Nango has a score of 67.9 (B) against WorkOS Pipes and Agents's 60 (C). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 32 points. - Nango: grade B, 67.9/100, rank #135 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nango.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/nango.json - WorkOS Pipes and Agents: grade C, 60/100, rank #256 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/workos-pipes.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/workos-pipes.json ## Which one, for what Pick Nango for reliability (+8), schema & documentation (+32), agent ergonomics (+5), payments & pricing (+30), maintenance & community (+7), transparency & trust (+14). Pick WorkOS Pipes and Agents for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Nango | WorkOS Pipes and Agents | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 78 | 70 | Nango +8 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 85 | 53 | Nango +32 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 74 | 69 | Nango +5 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 67 | 69 | WorkOS Pipes and Agents +2 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 10 | Nango +30 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 90 | 83 | Nango +7 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 78 | 64 | Nango +14 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **67.9 · B** | **60 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Nango | WorkOS Pipes and Agents | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Nango | WorkOS | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.nango.dev` | `https://api.workos.com` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Elastic License 2.0 | MIT (SDKs), platform closed | | Tools exposed | none | none | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | no | | MCP registry | not listed | `com.workos/mcp` | | Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-28 | | Popularity | 469k npm/wk | 221 stars, 4M npm/wk, 1.7M PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Nango.** 1,000+ APIs with OAuth, API key and client-credentials auth handled. Audit trail only on Enterprise, and logs kept 15 days on every plan. **WorkOS Pipes and Agents.** Agent identity with per-session revocation and token lifetimes set per blueprint. 21 incidents on the status page since 3 July 2026, several over an hour. ## Before you call either ### Nango 1. Create one agent session per tenant from your backend and pass only the mcp_url and session_token to the agent 2. Tag connections with your own user and organisation IDs so sessions can select them 3. Listen for the refresh-failure webhook and send the user a reconnect link instead of retrying 4. Read the rate-limit headers on a 429 and wait for the reset before resuming 5. Run 0.71.6 or later when self-hosting, and keep the runner port off the network ### WorkOS Pipes and Agents 1. Call POST /data-integrations/{provider}/token with user_id for each use and don't cache the token 2. Branch on `active` in the response and send the user to reconnect on `needs_reauthorization` 3. Wait for Retry-After on a 429, or back off with jitter when it's missing 4. Use lower-case provider slugs such as github or slack 5. Revoke an agent's session through the Agents API when a task ends instead of waiting for expiry ## Other comparisons with Nango or WorkOS Pipes and Agents - [Arcade.dev vs Nango](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcade-vs-nango.md) - [Arcade.dev vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arcade-vs-workos-pipes.md) - [Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault) vs Nango](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auth0-ai-agents-vs-nango.md) - [Auth0 for AI Agents (Token Vault) vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auth0-ai-agents-vs-workos-pipes.md) - [Descope Agentic Identity Hub vs Nango](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/descope-agentic-identity-vs-nango.md) - [Descope Agentic Identity Hub vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/descope-agentic-identity-vs-workos-pipes.md) - [Keycard vs Nango](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keycard-vs-nango.md) - [Keycard vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keycard-vs-workos-pipes.md) - [Nango vs Scalekit AgentKit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nango-vs-scalekit-agentkit.md) - [Nango vs Stytch Connected Apps](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nango-vs-stytch-connected-apps.md) - [Scalekit AgentKit vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scalekit-agentkit-vs-workos-pipes.md) - [Stytch Connected Apps vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/stytch-connected-apps-vs-workos-pipes.md)