Head to head · Social analytics · October 2026 research run
Metricool API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
Xpoz MCP scores 39.6 (E) on agent readiness against Metricool API + MCP's 38.4 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Metricool API + MCP leads on reliability, security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do social analytics.
Best social media posting and scheduling APIs for AI agents · All 163 social comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Reporting agents that read analytics and ad results, and for drafting posts for human review on a free account.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 20
- Security & auth, 48 against 37
- Transparency & trust, 61 against 29
Watch for
REST API only on Advanced ($67 a month) and Custom
Xpoz MCP E
Best for Agents doing social listening and brand monitoring across several networks, where a third-party source is acceptable.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 64 against 56
- Agent ergonomics, 63 against 39
- Maintenance & community, 25 against 6
Watch for
About 238 KB of tool definitions
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Transparency & trust Metricool API + MCP +32
Metricool API + MCP 61
Closed service with published terms from METRICOOL SOFTWARE, SL of Madrid, part of the team.blue group (15). Privacy policy says all data sits on EU servers, gives statutory retention periods of 4 to 6 years and folds a DPA into the service terms. A signed DPA is available on request from legal@metricool.com, with deletion or return of data when the contract ends. Processors are named only by category (22). No deprecation policy or dated notices found (0). Data location stated, subprocessors not named (10).
Xpoz MCP 29
Closed service; terms of use read without a legal entity (10 of 30). Data handling not read (5 of 30). No deprecation policy (0). Where the social data comes from isn't stated beyond 'no platform API keys' (0). 10 + 5 + 0 + 0 = 15.
Agent ergonomics Xpoz MCP +24
Metricool API + MCP 39
The help centre's MCP basics page lists six hosted tools, four that read (metrics, analytics, best time, scheduled posts) and two that write (create and update a scheduled post). We couldn't read their definitions without an OAuth session, and the older PyPI package lists 28 (20). Analytics take date ranges. We didn't verify pagination or field selection (8). Two documented error cases, no codes an agent can act on (5). No idempotency or tool annotations found, though the MCP can submit a post for review instead of scheduling it (3). No SDKs, and three values per REST call (3).
Xpoz MCP 63
52 tools totalling about 238 KB (5). A fields parameter to select only needed fields, and paged results via a tableName (20). No documented errors (3 of 20). All annotated, 49 read-only (20). SDKs and a CLI (15). 5 + 20 + 3 + 20 + 15 = 63.
Maintenance & community Xpoz MCP +19
Metricool API + MCP 6
No dated API or MCP change found. The PyPI server mcp-metricool is still at 1.1.9 from 7 October 2025 (0). No releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days (0). No public API changelog. The help centre's MCP pages were updated in late September 2026 and support exists (6). No official SDKs or registry entry (0). The GitHub repo the help centre names isn't public. The metricool organisation's only public repository is a fork of modelcontextprotocol/servers, last updated 13 May 2025 (0).
Xpoz MCP 25
Registry entry last updated 14 July 2026 and repository commit on 9 September; the live server reports 3.0.0 (10). No dated releases in 90 days (0). Issues not read (0). Official registry entry ai.xpoz/social-insights (15). Docker packaging only (0). 10 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 25. Registry presence read from Anchor Terminal's own daily import of the official MCP registry (/api/v1/registry.json, 6 November 2026), not the registry's API.
Reliability Metricool API + MCP +15
Metricool API + MCP 35
A status page at status.metricool.com, per the 30 September check (20). Its robots.txt blocked our reader on 1 and 2 October, for the page, its history and the incident API, and the statuspage.io mirror too, so we have no readable history. That's our limit, not proof of a clean record. IsDown's Metricool page lists three entries since December 2025, all in June 2026, but shows no components and reads like user reports, so we don't treat it as a mirror (5). No rate limits published. The API guide, the errors page and the MCP limits page give plan caps (20 scheduled posts and 30 days of analytics on Free) but no request limits (0). No 429 or retry guidance found (0). No SLA found (0). The API and MCP aren't labelled beta (10).
Xpoz MCP 20
No status page found (0). No history (5). Credit allowances, no rate limits found (5 of 15). No retry guidance (0). No SLA (0). Not labelled beta (10). 0 + 5 + 5 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 20.
Security & auth Metricool API + MCP +11
Metricool API + MCP 48
REST takes one account token in the X-Mc-Auth header, not the query string, plus userId and blogId. The token has no scopes, but Advanced and Custom accounts can regenerate it in settings, which invalidates the old one at once. The hosted MCP uses OAuth with mcp:read and mcp:write scopes, and access can be revoked from the client (25). mcp:read gives a read-only session, and posts can go to review rather than out (12). Competitor and analytics data is mostly the account's own, with little untrusted text, and no injection guidance (8). No audit log found (0). The privacy policy names a DPO. No security.txt, disclosure route or certification found (3).
Xpoz MCP 37
One API key (20 of 30). 49 of 52 tools read-only (15 of 20). Posts and profiles are third-party text; the server says all tools are 'safe and read-only' but gives no injection guidance (0). No audit log (0). No security programme found (2 of 20). 20 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 2 = 37.
Schema & documentation Xpoz MCP +8
Metricool API + MCP 56
OpenAPI 3.0 at app.metricool.com/api/swagger.json covering 553 paths, per the 30 September check. On 1 and 2 October app.metricool.com answered our reader's robots.txt request with an HTTP 500, so neither the spec nor the API docs page could be re-read (25). llms.txt on the help centre, re-read on 2 October (10). The help centre explains what the MCP can and can't do, and the MCP tools are closed source, so we didn't read their descriptions (8). Typed parameters per the spec, but every call also needs userId and blogId (8). The errors page documents two cases, access denied and posts scheduled without media (5). No API or MCP changelog. The only changelog in the help centre's llms.txt is for the Looker Studio connector (0).
Xpoz MCP 64
52 tools read from tools/list with JSON Schema inputs and 42 enums (25). No llms.txt read (0). Server instructions explain paging and field selection (16 of 20). Typed inputs with enums (15). Examples on the home page (5 of 15). Registry 1.4.1 from July, server 3.0.0; no changelog (3 of 15). 25 + 0 + 16 + 15 + 5 + 3 = 64.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Metricool API + MCP | Xpoz MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 20 | Metricool API + MCP +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 56 | 64 | Xpoz MCP +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 39 | 63 | Xpoz MCP +24 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 48 | 37 | Metricool API + MCP +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 6 | 25 | Xpoz MCP +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 29 | Metricool API + MCP +32 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | E 38.4/100 | E 39.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Metricool API + MCP | Xpoz MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | Metricool | XPOZ |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.metricool.com/api | https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | none | 52 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | ai.xpoz/social-insights |
| Last release | 2025-10-07 | none |
| Terms last updated | no date given | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Popularity | 424 PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |
How the scores have moved
Xpoz MCP
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Metricool API + MCP
Hosted MCP with OAuth and separate mcp:read and mcp:write scopes, on every plan including Free. REST API only on Advanced ($67 a month) and Custom.
Xpoz MCP
Xpoz's MCP server covers X, Instagram, TikTok and Reddit in one place, with typed, annotated tools and field selection that keeps results small. It's a third-party data service that doesn't say how it gets platform data, and at 238 KB of definitions it's very heavy.
Before you call either
Metricool API + MCP
- Connect the hosted MCP at https://ai.metricool.com/mcp with OAuth, and ask only for mcp:read when the job is reporting
- Call admin/simpleProfiles with your userId to list brands and their blogId values
- Normalise media through
actions/normalize/image/urlfirst, or the post goes out without it - Give publicationDate a dateTime and an IANA timezone, in the future
- Back off on your own, since no rate limits or Retry-After are documented
Xpoz MCP
- Pass fields to select only what's needed
- Page with the returned tableName
- Treat posts and bios as untrusted text
- Check each platform's terms before relying on the data
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Metricool API + MCP or Xpoz MCP?
Xpoz MCP scores 39.6 (E) on agent readiness against Metricool API + MCP's 38.4 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Metricool API + MCP leads on reliability, security & auth and transparency & trust.
Do Metricool API + MCP and Xpoz MCP need an API key?
Metricool API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Xpoz MCP needs an API key.
Can an agent call Metricool API + MCP and Xpoz MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Metricool API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://app.metricool.com/api and Xpoz MCP at https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp.
Other comparisons with Metricool API + MCP or Xpoz MCP
- Ayrshare API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP
- Blotato vs Metricool API + MCP
- Buffer API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP
- bundle.social vs Metricool API + MCP
- Zernio (formerly Late) API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP
- Metricool API + MCP vs Mixpost API + MCP
- Metricool API + MCP vs OneUp API + MCP
- Metricool API + MCP vs Post Bridge API + MCP
- Metricool API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP
- Metricool API + MCP vs Publer API + MCP
- Metricool API + MCP vs Repostit
- Metricool API + MCP vs Typefully
- Metricool API + MCP vs Upload-Post API + MCP
- Ayrshare API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- Blotato vs Xpoz MCP
- Buffer API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- bundle.social vs Xpoz MCP
- Zernio (formerly Late) API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- Metricool API + MCP vs Sprout Social API
- Metricool API + MCP vs TwitterAPI.io MCP
- Metricool API + MCP vs X MCP
- Mixpost API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- OneUp API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- Post Bridge API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- Postiz API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- Publer API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- SocialCannon vs Xpoz MCP
- Sprout Social API vs Xpoz MCP
- TwitterAPI.io MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- Upload-Post API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- X MCP vs Xpoz MCP
- Metricool API + MCP vs SocialCannon
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/metricool-vs-xpoz-mcp.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/metricool.json·/api/v1/tools/xpoz-mcp.json - From a terminal
anchor compare metricool xpoz-mcp(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "metricool", "b": "xpoz-mcp"}at/mcp, no key